Undamning图密善?重新评估最后的弗拉维亚原则:引言

A. Augoustakis, Emma Buckley, C. Stocks
{"title":"Undamning图密善?重新评估最后的弗拉维亚原则:引言","authors":"A. Augoustakis, Emma Buckley, C. Stocks","doi":"10.5406/illiclasstud.44.2.0233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This introductory chapter contextualizes the contributions of the various articles and their interdiscursive approach in combining material culture and literary evidence. It offers an overview of the difficulties of parsing a hostile historiographical tradition on the emperor Domitian, and the ideological as well as chronological fault-lines created by authors who very often straddled the Flavian and post-Flavian periods, turning from enthusiastic support of the emperor to damning critique; the particular challenges to the material evidence posed by Domitian's damnatio, and the physical as well as literary forms of oblivion that \"erased\" the last Flavian emperor; the gaps, absences, revisions, and overwritings that complicate accurate understanding of Domitian's character, achievements, and historical record.","PeriodicalId":81501,"journal":{"name":"Illinois classical studies","volume":"44 1","pages":"233 - 241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Undamning Domitian? Reassessing the Last Flavian princeps: Introduction\",\"authors\":\"A. Augoustakis, Emma Buckley, C. Stocks\",\"doi\":\"10.5406/illiclasstud.44.2.0233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This introductory chapter contextualizes the contributions of the various articles and their interdiscursive approach in combining material culture and literary evidence. It offers an overview of the difficulties of parsing a hostile historiographical tradition on the emperor Domitian, and the ideological as well as chronological fault-lines created by authors who very often straddled the Flavian and post-Flavian periods, turning from enthusiastic support of the emperor to damning critique; the particular challenges to the material evidence posed by Domitian's damnatio, and the physical as well as literary forms of oblivion that \\\"erased\\\" the last Flavian emperor; the gaps, absences, revisions, and overwritings that complicate accurate understanding of Domitian's character, achievements, and historical record.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Illinois classical studies\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"233 - 241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Illinois classical studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5406/illiclasstud.44.2.0233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Illinois classical studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/illiclasstud.44.2.0233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本导论章将各种文章的贡献及其在结合物质文化和文学证据方面的话语间方法置于语境中。它概述了分析对多米提安皇帝充满敌意的史学传统的困难,以及经常跨越弗拉维安和后弗拉维安时期的作者所创造的意识形态和时间断层线,从对皇帝的热情支持转向对皇帝的谴责;多米提安的诅咒对物证构成了特别的挑战,以及“抹去”最后一位弗拉维皇帝的物质和文学形式的遗忘;这些空白、缺失、修订和覆盖使得对多米提安的性格、成就和历史记录的准确理解变得复杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Undamning Domitian? Reassessing the Last Flavian princeps: Introduction
Abstract:This introductory chapter contextualizes the contributions of the various articles and their interdiscursive approach in combining material culture and literary evidence. It offers an overview of the difficulties of parsing a hostile historiographical tradition on the emperor Domitian, and the ideological as well as chronological fault-lines created by authors who very often straddled the Flavian and post-Flavian periods, turning from enthusiastic support of the emperor to damning critique; the particular challenges to the material evidence posed by Domitian's damnatio, and the physical as well as literary forms of oblivion that "erased" the last Flavian emperor; the gaps, absences, revisions, and overwritings that complicate accurate understanding of Domitian's character, achievements, and historical record.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信