Ubuntu与非殖民化评估的Afrofemism

Fatimata Kane, T. Archibald
{"title":"Ubuntu与非殖民化评估的Afrofemism","authors":"Fatimata Kane, T. Archibald","doi":"10.56645/jmde.v19i44.793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: African evaluation has been at the forefront of innovating the praxis of decolonizing evaluation, especially through ‘Made in Africa Evaluation’ (MAE) and related efforts. Still, there is a wealth of additional African epistemologies and philosophical paradigms which either have not been adequately discussed in the literature, or have not yet made their way into the discourse and practice of MAE. \nPurpose: The purpose of this conceptual paper is to propose a theoretical framework that can be used to further inform indigenous and decolonizing evaluation approaches in African contexts and beyond. Specifically, we address the often-cited notion of ubuntu, informed by African philosophical literature beyond the field of evaluation, and we propose Sylvia Tamale’s decolonizing and Afro-feminist lens as a complementary philosophical framing with great potential applications in indigenous and decolonizing evaluation in African contexts and beyond. \nSetting: Not applicable. \nIntervention: Not applicable. \nResearch Design: This conceptual study draws on philosophical literature from African philosophy and political science to weave together notions of ubuntu with decolonizing Afro-Feminism. \nData Collection and Analysis: Not applicable. \nFindings: We propose that a decolonizing, indigenous evaluation approach rooted in Ubuntu and Afro-Feminism would: question categorial, dichotomous, hierarchical logics (e.g., methodological hierarchical hegemonies); recognize masculinist, imperialist, modernist ideals inscribed in institutions (e.g., via government rationality, therefore also via evaluation); foreground intersectionality; and make room for “the moral economy” and other deeply communitarian framings.","PeriodicalId":91909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ubuntu and Afrofeminism for Decolonizing Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Fatimata Kane, T. Archibald\",\"doi\":\"10.56645/jmde.v19i44.793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: African evaluation has been at the forefront of innovating the praxis of decolonizing evaluation, especially through ‘Made in Africa Evaluation’ (MAE) and related efforts. Still, there is a wealth of additional African epistemologies and philosophical paradigms which either have not been adequately discussed in the literature, or have not yet made their way into the discourse and practice of MAE. \\nPurpose: The purpose of this conceptual paper is to propose a theoretical framework that can be used to further inform indigenous and decolonizing evaluation approaches in African contexts and beyond. Specifically, we address the often-cited notion of ubuntu, informed by African philosophical literature beyond the field of evaluation, and we propose Sylvia Tamale’s decolonizing and Afro-feminist lens as a complementary philosophical framing with great potential applications in indigenous and decolonizing evaluation in African contexts and beyond. \\nSetting: Not applicable. \\nIntervention: Not applicable. \\nResearch Design: This conceptual study draws on philosophical literature from African philosophy and political science to weave together notions of ubuntu with decolonizing Afro-Feminism. \\nData Collection and Analysis: Not applicable. \\nFindings: We propose that a decolonizing, indigenous evaluation approach rooted in Ubuntu and Afro-Feminism would: question categorial, dichotomous, hierarchical logics (e.g., methodological hierarchical hegemonies); recognize masculinist, imperialist, modernist ideals inscribed in institutions (e.g., via government rationality, therefore also via evaluation); foreground intersectionality; and make room for “the moral economy” and other deeply communitarian framings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v19i44.793\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v19i44.793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:非洲评估一直处于创新非殖民化评估实践的前沿,特别是通过“非洲制造评估”和相关努力。尽管如此,还有大量额外的非洲认识论和哲学范式,它们要么没有在文献中得到充分讨论,要么还没有进入MAE的话语和实践。目的:本概念文件的目的是提出一个理论框架,可用于进一步为非洲内外的土著和非殖民化评价方法提供信息。具体而言,我们讨论了经常被引用的ubuntu概念,这一概念是由评估领域之外的非洲哲学文献提供的,我们提出Sylvia Tamale的非殖民化和非洲女权主义视角作为一种互补的哲学框架,在非洲背景下及其他地区的土著和非殖民化评估中具有巨大的潜在应用。设置:不适用。干预:不适用。研究设计:这项概念研究借鉴了非洲哲学和政治学的哲学文献,将乌班图的概念与非殖民化的非洲女权主义交织在一起。数据收集和分析:不适用。研究结果:我们提出,植根于Ubuntu和非洲女权主义的非殖民化、本土评估方法将:质疑分类、二分、等级逻辑(例如,方法论的等级霸权);承认制度中的男性主义、帝国主义和现代主义理想(例如,通过政府理性,因此也通过评估);前景交叉性;并为“道德经济”和其他深刻的社群主义框架腾出空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ubuntu and Afrofeminism for Decolonizing Evaluation
Background: African evaluation has been at the forefront of innovating the praxis of decolonizing evaluation, especially through ‘Made in Africa Evaluation’ (MAE) and related efforts. Still, there is a wealth of additional African epistemologies and philosophical paradigms which either have not been adequately discussed in the literature, or have not yet made their way into the discourse and practice of MAE. Purpose: The purpose of this conceptual paper is to propose a theoretical framework that can be used to further inform indigenous and decolonizing evaluation approaches in African contexts and beyond. Specifically, we address the often-cited notion of ubuntu, informed by African philosophical literature beyond the field of evaluation, and we propose Sylvia Tamale’s decolonizing and Afro-feminist lens as a complementary philosophical framing with great potential applications in indigenous and decolonizing evaluation in African contexts and beyond. Setting: Not applicable. Intervention: Not applicable. Research Design: This conceptual study draws on philosophical literature from African philosophy and political science to weave together notions of ubuntu with decolonizing Afro-Feminism. Data Collection and Analysis: Not applicable. Findings: We propose that a decolonizing, indigenous evaluation approach rooted in Ubuntu and Afro-Feminism would: question categorial, dichotomous, hierarchical logics (e.g., methodological hierarchical hegemonies); recognize masculinist, imperialist, modernist ideals inscribed in institutions (e.g., via government rationality, therefore also via evaluation); foreground intersectionality; and make room for “the moral economy” and other deeply communitarian framings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信