网上关于“同性恋”和宗教的讨论

IF 1.6 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Jarmo Jantunen, Samu Kytölä
{"title":"网上关于“同性恋”和宗教的讨论","authors":"Jarmo Jantunen, Samu Kytölä","doi":"10.1075/jls.20011.jan","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article examines Finnish online forum discussions where religion and discourses of ‘homosexuality’ are\n connected in various ways. Previous research (e.g. Jantunen 2018a) shows that in\n Finnish online discussions where sexual minorities are the topic, religion stands out as a significant feature – particularly in\n discourses on ‘homosexuality’. Via corpus-assisted discourse analysis (CADS), the present study adds to previous knowledge on this\n subject by qualitatively analyzing the occurrences of certain keywords in the Finnish societal context – one in which immigration\n and the visibility of both Islam and sexual minorities are perceived to have increased. The analysis found four interrelated key\n discourses in these online discussions: (1) Islamization as an alleged threat to gay people (in the data: ‘homosexuals’); (2) the\n alleged indifference/ignorance of people to Islam’s stance against sexual minorities; (3) relativist discourse(s) claiming all\n fundamentalists to be similar; and (4) othering – including for instance, the verbal stylization of Muslims as being particularly\n hypersexual.","PeriodicalId":36680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Sexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online discourses of ‘homosexuality’ and religion\",\"authors\":\"Jarmo Jantunen, Samu Kytölä\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jls.20011.jan\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article examines Finnish online forum discussions where religion and discourses of ‘homosexuality’ are\\n connected in various ways. Previous research (e.g. Jantunen 2018a) shows that in\\n Finnish online discussions where sexual minorities are the topic, religion stands out as a significant feature – particularly in\\n discourses on ‘homosexuality’. Via corpus-assisted discourse analysis (CADS), the present study adds to previous knowledge on this\\n subject by qualitatively analyzing the occurrences of certain keywords in the Finnish societal context – one in which immigration\\n and the visibility of both Islam and sexual minorities are perceived to have increased. The analysis found four interrelated key\\n discourses in these online discussions: (1) Islamization as an alleged threat to gay people (in the data: ‘homosexuals’); (2) the\\n alleged indifference/ignorance of people to Islam’s stance against sexual minorities; (3) relativist discourse(s) claiming all\\n fundamentalists to be similar; and (4) othering – including for instance, the verbal stylization of Muslims as being particularly\\n hypersexual.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Language and Sexuality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Language and Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.20011.jan\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language and Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.20011.jan","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章考察了芬兰在线论坛的讨论,宗教和“同性恋”话语以各种方式联系在一起。先前的研究(例如Jantunen 2018a)表明,在以性少数群体为主题的芬兰在线讨论中,宗教是一个重要特征,尤其是在关于“同性恋”的讨论中。通过语料库辅助话语分析(CADS),本研究通过对芬兰社会背景下某些关键词的出现进行定性分析,增加了以往对这一主题的了解——在芬兰社会背景中,移民和伊斯兰教和性少数群体的知名度都有所提高。分析发现,在这些在线讨论中有四个相互关联的关键话语:(1)伊斯兰化是对同性恋者的所谓威胁(数据中:“同性恋者”);(2) 据称人们对伊斯兰教反对性少数群体的立场漠不关心/无知;(3) 相对主义话语声称所有原教旨主义者都是相似的;以及(4)其他——例如,包括将穆斯林语言风格化为特别性欲亢进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Online discourses of ‘homosexuality’ and religion
This article examines Finnish online forum discussions where religion and discourses of ‘homosexuality’ are connected in various ways. Previous research (e.g. Jantunen 2018a) shows that in Finnish online discussions where sexual minorities are the topic, religion stands out as a significant feature – particularly in discourses on ‘homosexuality’. Via corpus-assisted discourse analysis (CADS), the present study adds to previous knowledge on this subject by qualitatively analyzing the occurrences of certain keywords in the Finnish societal context – one in which immigration and the visibility of both Islam and sexual minorities are perceived to have increased. The analysis found four interrelated key discourses in these online discussions: (1) Islamization as an alleged threat to gay people (in the data: ‘homosexuals’); (2) the alleged indifference/ignorance of people to Islam’s stance against sexual minorities; (3) relativist discourse(s) claiming all fundamentalists to be similar; and (4) othering – including for instance, the verbal stylization of Muslims as being particularly hypersexual.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Language and Sexuality
Journal of Language and Sexuality Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信