过程思想与罗马天主教:挑战与承诺Marc A. Pugliese, John Becker主编

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
R. Nicastro
{"title":"过程思想与罗马天主教:挑战与承诺Marc A. Pugliese, John Becker主编","authors":"R. Nicastro","doi":"10.1353/ecu.2023.a902010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Catholic intellectual tradition is a rich and multidimensional history of ideas. At the heart of the tradition is the ongoing challenge to show the integral and irreducible relationship between faith and reason. With the explicit intention to reconcile religion with that of contemporary scientific discoveries, Alfred North Whitehead constructed a metaphysical system in which he grounded the deeper implications of Einstein’s relativity theory, quantum indeterminacy, and biological evolution. Utilizing the salient features of Whitehead’s framework, many of the authors in this erudite collection of essays discuss how process philosophy can shed new light on theological concepts unique to Roman Catholicism. Twentiethcentury theologian Karl Rahner remarked that the principal task of theology is to present the Christian message coherently. Rather than simply reiterating what persons have thought the Christian message to be in the past, the theologian seeks to provide an interpretation of the Christian message that is relevant and meaningful to each new time, place, and circumstance. The greatest strength of this volume, therefore, lies in its constructive chapters, as they effectively “liberate Catholics from the fear that accepting the ideas of a recent thinker like Whitehead requires rejection of essential Catholic teaching by making it clear that profound Catholic thinkers who have paid attention to their Catholic experiences have come to similar conclusions” (p. xi). Ilia Delio, for instance, offers an incisive analysis of Duns Scotus’s philosophy of univocity and compares it to Whitehead’s idea of creativity as an ultimate principle. In a subtle way, she argues that Dun Scotus’s work prepared the way for Whitehead’s. As Catholic theology has generally been receptive to assimilating ideas from philosophy and science, as MariaTeresa Teixeria’s chapter reminds us, then the nonsubstantial character of Whitehead’s corpus should not be an obstacle to thoughtful interaction (p. 75). Teixeria urges Catholics instead to pay attention to his ideas and to reconsider them in ways that are faithful to the distinctiveness of the tradition. Concerned with the dimension of community as a Catholic priest and theologian, Joseph Bracken’s chapter proposes a shift in process metaphysics to focus more on systems thinking. As one’s relations to others are constitutive of oneself, Bracken calls our attention “to the kinds of entities (systems) that are generated and their role in shaping us who are members as well as the larger society” (p. xiii). In an effort to display agreement between Whitehead’s and Thomas","PeriodicalId":43047,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ECUMENICAL STUDIES","volume":"58 1","pages":"294 - 295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Process Thought and Roman Catholicism: Challenges and Promises ed. by Marc A. Pugliese and John Becker (review)\",\"authors\":\"R. Nicastro\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ecu.2023.a902010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Catholic intellectual tradition is a rich and multidimensional history of ideas. At the heart of the tradition is the ongoing challenge to show the integral and irreducible relationship between faith and reason. With the explicit intention to reconcile religion with that of contemporary scientific discoveries, Alfred North Whitehead constructed a metaphysical system in which he grounded the deeper implications of Einstein’s relativity theory, quantum indeterminacy, and biological evolution. Utilizing the salient features of Whitehead’s framework, many of the authors in this erudite collection of essays discuss how process philosophy can shed new light on theological concepts unique to Roman Catholicism. Twentiethcentury theologian Karl Rahner remarked that the principal task of theology is to present the Christian message coherently. Rather than simply reiterating what persons have thought the Christian message to be in the past, the theologian seeks to provide an interpretation of the Christian message that is relevant and meaningful to each new time, place, and circumstance. The greatest strength of this volume, therefore, lies in its constructive chapters, as they effectively “liberate Catholics from the fear that accepting the ideas of a recent thinker like Whitehead requires rejection of essential Catholic teaching by making it clear that profound Catholic thinkers who have paid attention to their Catholic experiences have come to similar conclusions” (p. xi). Ilia Delio, for instance, offers an incisive analysis of Duns Scotus’s philosophy of univocity and compares it to Whitehead’s idea of creativity as an ultimate principle. In a subtle way, she argues that Dun Scotus’s work prepared the way for Whitehead’s. As Catholic theology has generally been receptive to assimilating ideas from philosophy and science, as MariaTeresa Teixeria’s chapter reminds us, then the nonsubstantial character of Whitehead’s corpus should not be an obstacle to thoughtful interaction (p. 75). Teixeria urges Catholics instead to pay attention to his ideas and to reconsider them in ways that are faithful to the distinctiveness of the tradition. Concerned with the dimension of community as a Catholic priest and theologian, Joseph Bracken’s chapter proposes a shift in process metaphysics to focus more on systems thinking. As one’s relations to others are constitutive of oneself, Bracken calls our attention “to the kinds of entities (systems) that are generated and their role in shaping us who are members as well as the larger society” (p. xiii). In an effort to display agreement between Whitehead’s and Thomas\",\"PeriodicalId\":43047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF ECUMENICAL STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"294 - 295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF ECUMENICAL STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecu.2023.a902010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ECUMENICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecu.2023.a902010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

天主教的思想传统是一部丰富而多元的思想史。传统的核心是不断挑战,以显示信仰与理性之间的整体和不可简化的关系。怀著调和宗教与当代科学发现的明确意图,阿尔弗雷德·诺斯·怀特海构建了一个形而上学的体系,在这个体系中,他奠定了爱因斯坦相对论、量子不确定性和生物进化的更深含义。利用怀特黑德框架的显著特征,许多作者在这本博学多才的文集中讨论了过程哲学如何为罗马天主教特有的神学概念提供新的启示。二十世纪的神学家卡尔·拉纳说,神学的主要任务是连贯地呈现基督教的信息。神学家不是简单地重申过去人们对基督教信息的看法,而是寻求对基督教信息提供一种解释,这种解释与每个新的时间、地点和环境相关且有意义。因此,这本书的最大力量在于其建设性的章节,因为它们有效地“将天主教徒从恐惧中解放出来,即接受像怀特黑德这样的近代思想家的思想需要拒绝基本的天主教教义,通过清楚地表明,深刻的天主教思想家已经注意到他们的天主教经历得出了类似的结论”(第xi页)。例如,伊利亚·德里奥,对邓斯·斯科特的单一性哲学进行了深刻的分析,并将其与怀特黑德的创造力作为终极原则的观点进行了比较。她以一种微妙的方式认为,邓·司各脱的作品为怀特黑德的作品铺平了道路。正如玛丽亚·特雷莎·特谢利亚的章节所提醒我们的那样,天主教神学普遍接受从哲学和科学中吸收思想,那么怀特黑德语料库的非实质性特征不应成为深思熟虑的互动的障碍(第75页)。特谢里亚敦促天主教徒转而关注他的想法,并以忠于传统独特性的方式重新考虑这些想法。作为一名天主教牧师和神学家,约瑟夫·布雷肯(Joseph Bracken)关注社区的维度,他的章节提出了过程形而上学的转变,更多地关注系统思维。由于一个人与他人的关系构成了他自己,Bracken呼吁我们注意“产生的实体(系统)的种类,以及它们在塑造我们作为成员以及更大的社会中的作用”(第13页)。为了展示怀特黑德和托马斯之间的共识
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Process Thought and Roman Catholicism: Challenges and Promises ed. by Marc A. Pugliese and John Becker (review)
The Catholic intellectual tradition is a rich and multidimensional history of ideas. At the heart of the tradition is the ongoing challenge to show the integral and irreducible relationship between faith and reason. With the explicit intention to reconcile religion with that of contemporary scientific discoveries, Alfred North Whitehead constructed a metaphysical system in which he grounded the deeper implications of Einstein’s relativity theory, quantum indeterminacy, and biological evolution. Utilizing the salient features of Whitehead’s framework, many of the authors in this erudite collection of essays discuss how process philosophy can shed new light on theological concepts unique to Roman Catholicism. Twentiethcentury theologian Karl Rahner remarked that the principal task of theology is to present the Christian message coherently. Rather than simply reiterating what persons have thought the Christian message to be in the past, the theologian seeks to provide an interpretation of the Christian message that is relevant and meaningful to each new time, place, and circumstance. The greatest strength of this volume, therefore, lies in its constructive chapters, as they effectively “liberate Catholics from the fear that accepting the ideas of a recent thinker like Whitehead requires rejection of essential Catholic teaching by making it clear that profound Catholic thinkers who have paid attention to their Catholic experiences have come to similar conclusions” (p. xi). Ilia Delio, for instance, offers an incisive analysis of Duns Scotus’s philosophy of univocity and compares it to Whitehead’s idea of creativity as an ultimate principle. In a subtle way, she argues that Dun Scotus’s work prepared the way for Whitehead’s. As Catholic theology has generally been receptive to assimilating ideas from philosophy and science, as MariaTeresa Teixeria’s chapter reminds us, then the nonsubstantial character of Whitehead’s corpus should not be an obstacle to thoughtful interaction (p. 75). Teixeria urges Catholics instead to pay attention to his ideas and to reconsider them in ways that are faithful to the distinctiveness of the tradition. Concerned with the dimension of community as a Catholic priest and theologian, Joseph Bracken’s chapter proposes a shift in process metaphysics to focus more on systems thinking. As one’s relations to others are constitutive of oneself, Bracken calls our attention “to the kinds of entities (systems) that are generated and their role in shaping us who are members as well as the larger society” (p. xiii). In an effort to display agreement between Whitehead’s and Thomas
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信