阿拉伯国家的职业治疗文献:当前内容、方法、挑战和未来方向

IF 1.6 Q2 Health Professions
Mustafa Ahmad Alqaisi, H. Sarsak
{"title":"阿拉伯国家的职业治疗文献:当前内容、方法、挑战和未来方向","authors":"Mustafa Ahmad Alqaisi, H. Sarsak","doi":"10.1080/14473828.2022.2035531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to describe clinical documentation of occupational therapy in Arab countries. An online survey was completed by 372 occupational therapists, 79.8% were bachelor’s degree holders and 39.5% had 1–5 years of experience. As reported, 40.3% had limitations restrict their ability to document OT services, 72.6% documented through manual forms, and 73.4% adhered to confidentiality requirements. Most participants required extra time (72.6%) and extra efforts (63.7%) for documentation, 45.2% believed that legal issues may arise if they do not document and all agreed documentation is essential. Comprehensive accurate documentation can be challenging with limited time, high caseload, inconsistency in formatting and terminology, and lack of experience and support. Documentation skills, knowledge, and content may vary based on ways of documentation, country of practice, age, experience, and education. This study represents an important first step in mapping knowledge and standardising documentation among Arab occupational therapists.","PeriodicalId":53208,"journal":{"name":"World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin","volume":"78 1","pages":"90 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupational therapy documentation in Arab countries: Current content, methods, challenges, and future directions\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Ahmad Alqaisi, H. Sarsak\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14473828.2022.2035531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to describe clinical documentation of occupational therapy in Arab countries. An online survey was completed by 372 occupational therapists, 79.8% were bachelor’s degree holders and 39.5% had 1–5 years of experience. As reported, 40.3% had limitations restrict their ability to document OT services, 72.6% documented through manual forms, and 73.4% adhered to confidentiality requirements. Most participants required extra time (72.6%) and extra efforts (63.7%) for documentation, 45.2% believed that legal issues may arise if they do not document and all agreed documentation is essential. Comprehensive accurate documentation can be challenging with limited time, high caseload, inconsistency in formatting and terminology, and lack of experience and support. Documentation skills, knowledge, and content may vary based on ways of documentation, country of practice, age, experience, and education. This study represents an important first step in mapping knowledge and standardising documentation among Arab occupational therapists.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"90 - 98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14473828.2022.2035531\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14473828.2022.2035531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究的目的是描述阿拉伯国家职业治疗的临床文献。372名职业治疗师完成了一项在线调查,79.8%的人拥有学士学位,39.5%的人有1-5年的工作经验。据报道,40.3%的人有限制,无法记录OT服务,72.6%的人通过手动表格记录,73.4%的人遵守保密要求。大多数参与者需要额外的时间(72.6%)和额外的努力(63.7%)来记录文件,45.2%的参与者认为,如果他们不记录文件,可能会出现法律问题,而所有商定的文件都是必不可少的。由于时间有限、工作量大、格式和术语不一致以及缺乏经验和支持,全面准确的文档编制可能具有挑战性。记录技能、知识和内容可能因记录方式、执业国家、年龄、经验和教育程度而异。这项研究为阿拉伯职业治疗师绘制知识图谱和标准化文件迈出了重要的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Occupational therapy documentation in Arab countries: Current content, methods, challenges, and future directions
ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to describe clinical documentation of occupational therapy in Arab countries. An online survey was completed by 372 occupational therapists, 79.8% were bachelor’s degree holders and 39.5% had 1–5 years of experience. As reported, 40.3% had limitations restrict their ability to document OT services, 72.6% documented through manual forms, and 73.4% adhered to confidentiality requirements. Most participants required extra time (72.6%) and extra efforts (63.7%) for documentation, 45.2% believed that legal issues may arise if they do not document and all agreed documentation is essential. Comprehensive accurate documentation can be challenging with limited time, high caseload, inconsistency in formatting and terminology, and lack of experience and support. Documentation skills, knowledge, and content may vary based on ways of documentation, country of practice, age, experience, and education. This study represents an important first step in mapping knowledge and standardising documentation among Arab occupational therapists.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信