“艰难的政治工作”:碳密集型企业应对气候风险的战略对策

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Accounting Pub Date : 2021-06-16 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3868564
M. Metzner, A. Mikes
{"title":"“艰难的政治工作”:碳密集型企业应对气候风险的战略对策","authors":"M. Metzner, A. Mikes","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3868564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Governments, investors, and consumers have stepped up pressure on publicly listed companies to face up to climate risks and to reduce carbon emissions. At the same time, the pressure to deliver financial results remains strong. Based on research on 19 European carbon-intensive corporations in the chemical, steel, and utility industries, we explore how companies frame and reconcile their climate-risk-related objectives with their financial commitments, and enact a variety of response strategies. Overall, we find that corporations in heavy industries deploy four generic climate-response strategies: (1) Purposeful Green Strategies, (2) Engagement Strategies, (3) Green Differentiation, and (4) Defensive Strategies. We show that the organizational enactment of these strategic responses is conditioned by (1) corporations’ framing of climate risk as a threat or opportunity, (2) the perceived compatibility of decarbonization demands with existing commitments, and (3) their internal representations of feasible decarbonization-goals and responses. Our study highlights the importance of accounting and control tools and processes in mediating and bringing about institutional work, some of which may drive transformative innovation and impactful decarbonization strategies. Our evidence points at the rising importance of institutional work as an organizational capability in corporate responses to the climate change problem.","PeriodicalId":7317,"journal":{"name":"Accounting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Difficult Political Work': Strategic Responses to Climate Risk by Carbon-intensive Corporations\",\"authors\":\"M. Metzner, A. Mikes\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3868564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Governments, investors, and consumers have stepped up pressure on publicly listed companies to face up to climate risks and to reduce carbon emissions. At the same time, the pressure to deliver financial results remains strong. Based on research on 19 European carbon-intensive corporations in the chemical, steel, and utility industries, we explore how companies frame and reconcile their climate-risk-related objectives with their financial commitments, and enact a variety of response strategies. Overall, we find that corporations in heavy industries deploy four generic climate-response strategies: (1) Purposeful Green Strategies, (2) Engagement Strategies, (3) Green Differentiation, and (4) Defensive Strategies. We show that the organizational enactment of these strategic responses is conditioned by (1) corporations’ framing of climate risk as a threat or opportunity, (2) the perceived compatibility of decarbonization demands with existing commitments, and (3) their internal representations of feasible decarbonization-goals and responses. Our study highlights the importance of accounting and control tools and processes in mediating and bringing about institutional work, some of which may drive transformative innovation and impactful decarbonization strategies. Our evidence points at the rising importance of institutional work as an organizational capability in corporate responses to the climate change problem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3868564\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3868564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

政府、投资者和消费者加大了对上市公司的压力,要求它们正视气候风险并减少碳排放。与此同时,实现财务业绩的压力依然很大。基于对化工、钢铁和公用事业行业19家欧洲碳密集型企业的研究,我们探讨了企业如何制定和协调其气候风险相关目标与财务承诺,并制定了各种应对策略。总体而言,我们发现重工业企业部署了四种通用的气候应对策略:(1)有目的的绿色战略,(2)参与战略,(3)绿色差异化,和(4)防御战略。我们表明,这些战略应对措施的组织制定受到以下条件的制约:(1)企业将气候风险视为威胁或机遇,(2)脱碳需求与现有承诺的兼容性,以及(3)企业对可行脱碳目标和应对措施的内部表示。我们的研究强调了会计和控制工具和流程在调解和实现机构工作方面的重要性,其中一些工具和流程可能会推动变革性创新和有影响力的脱碳战略。我们的证据表明,机构工作作为企业应对气候变化问题的组织能力,其重要性正在上升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'Difficult Political Work': Strategic Responses to Climate Risk by Carbon-intensive Corporations
Governments, investors, and consumers have stepped up pressure on publicly listed companies to face up to climate risks and to reduce carbon emissions. At the same time, the pressure to deliver financial results remains strong. Based on research on 19 European carbon-intensive corporations in the chemical, steel, and utility industries, we explore how companies frame and reconcile their climate-risk-related objectives with their financial commitments, and enact a variety of response strategies. Overall, we find that corporations in heavy industries deploy four generic climate-response strategies: (1) Purposeful Green Strategies, (2) Engagement Strategies, (3) Green Differentiation, and (4) Defensive Strategies. We show that the organizational enactment of these strategic responses is conditioned by (1) corporations’ framing of climate risk as a threat or opportunity, (2) the perceived compatibility of decarbonization demands with existing commitments, and (3) their internal representations of feasible decarbonization-goals and responses. Our study highlights the importance of accounting and control tools and processes in mediating and bringing about institutional work, some of which may drive transformative innovation and impactful decarbonization strategies. Our evidence points at the rising importance of institutional work as an organizational capability in corporate responses to the climate change problem.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting
Accounting Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信