使用NASA-TLX和SURG-TLX在高保真模拟器中开发腹腔镜手术工作量的主观仪器

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jiahui Ma, B. Lowndes, K. Chrouser, S. Hallbeck, B. McCrory
{"title":"使用NASA-TLX和SURG-TLX在高保真模拟器中开发腹腔镜手术工作量的主观仪器","authors":"Jiahui Ma, B. Lowndes, K. Chrouser, S. Hallbeck, B. McCrory","doi":"10.1080/24725579.2020.1854395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Surgery Task Load Index (SURG-TLX) and National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) are subjective workload assessment instruments. These instruments have three coinciding workload dimensions, but each has three unique dimensions. Each dimension is explained by a unique descriptor. It was hypothesized that the SURG-TLX and NASA-TLX workload ratings would differ when assessing the same surgical methods and tasks. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to assess the SURG- and NASA-TLX dimensions toward the creation of a novel workload instrument to better predict simulated laparoscopic surgical workload. Twenty-five (25) participants were selected at a large, midwestern teaching hospital to conduct two simulated surgical tasks using four different laparoscopic methods. Each participant completed a total of eight trials and after each trial workload was assessed using both the NASA-TLX and SURG-TLX. The overall NASA-TLX dimensions were rated significantly higher (greater workload) compared to the overall SURG-TLX dimensions (F = 12.04, p = 0.001). Principle component analysis of workload dimensions suggests that a new surgical subjective workload measurement instrument should include the dimensions of Mental Demand, Physical Demand, Temporal Demand, Performance, Frustration and Situational Stress. However, validation of this novel tool is needed.","PeriodicalId":37744,"journal":{"name":"IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering","volume":"11 1","pages":"161 - 169"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24725579.2020.1854395","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a subjective instrument for laparoscopic surgical workload in a high fidelity simulator using the NASA-TLX and SURG-TLX\",\"authors\":\"Jiahui Ma, B. Lowndes, K. Chrouser, S. Hallbeck, B. McCrory\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24725579.2020.1854395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The Surgery Task Load Index (SURG-TLX) and National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) are subjective workload assessment instruments. These instruments have three coinciding workload dimensions, but each has three unique dimensions. Each dimension is explained by a unique descriptor. It was hypothesized that the SURG-TLX and NASA-TLX workload ratings would differ when assessing the same surgical methods and tasks. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to assess the SURG- and NASA-TLX dimensions toward the creation of a novel workload instrument to better predict simulated laparoscopic surgical workload. Twenty-five (25) participants were selected at a large, midwestern teaching hospital to conduct two simulated surgical tasks using four different laparoscopic methods. Each participant completed a total of eight trials and after each trial workload was assessed using both the NASA-TLX and SURG-TLX. The overall NASA-TLX dimensions were rated significantly higher (greater workload) compared to the overall SURG-TLX dimensions (F = 12.04, p = 0.001). Principle component analysis of workload dimensions suggests that a new surgical subjective workload measurement instrument should include the dimensions of Mental Demand, Physical Demand, Temporal Demand, Performance, Frustration and Situational Stress. However, validation of this novel tool is needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"161 - 169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24725579.2020.1854395\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725579.2020.1854395\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725579.2020.1854395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要外科手术任务负荷指数(SURG-TLX)和美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数(NASA-TLX)是主观负荷评估工具。这些工具有三个一致的工作负载维度,但每个都有三个独特的维度。每个维度都由一个唯一的描述符解释。假设在评估相同的手术方法和任务时,SURG-TLX和NASA-TLX的工作量评分会有所不同。因此,本研究的目的是评估SURG-和NASA-TLX维度,以创建一种新的工作量仪器,以更好地预测模拟腹腔镜手术工作量。二十五(25)名参与者在中西部的一家大型教学医院被选中,使用四种不同的腹腔镜方法进行两项模拟手术任务。每位参与者总共完成了8次试验,每次试验后使用NASA-TLX和SURG-TLX评估工作量。与SURG-TLX总体维度相比,NASA-TLX总体维度的评分明显更高(更大的工作量)(F = 12.04, p = 0.001)。工作负荷维度的主成分分析表明,新的外科主观工作负荷测量工具应包括心理需求、生理需求、时间需求、表现、挫折和情境压力等维度。然而,需要对这种新工具进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing a subjective instrument for laparoscopic surgical workload in a high fidelity simulator using the NASA-TLX and SURG-TLX
Abstract The Surgery Task Load Index (SURG-TLX) and National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) are subjective workload assessment instruments. These instruments have three coinciding workload dimensions, but each has three unique dimensions. Each dimension is explained by a unique descriptor. It was hypothesized that the SURG-TLX and NASA-TLX workload ratings would differ when assessing the same surgical methods and tasks. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to assess the SURG- and NASA-TLX dimensions toward the creation of a novel workload instrument to better predict simulated laparoscopic surgical workload. Twenty-five (25) participants were selected at a large, midwestern teaching hospital to conduct two simulated surgical tasks using four different laparoscopic methods. Each participant completed a total of eight trials and after each trial workload was assessed using both the NASA-TLX and SURG-TLX. The overall NASA-TLX dimensions were rated significantly higher (greater workload) compared to the overall SURG-TLX dimensions (F = 12.04, p = 0.001). Principle component analysis of workload dimensions suggests that a new surgical subjective workload measurement instrument should include the dimensions of Mental Demand, Physical Demand, Temporal Demand, Performance, Frustration and Situational Stress. However, validation of this novel tool is needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering
IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering aims to foster the healthcare systems community by publishing high quality papers that have a strong methodological focus and direct applicability to healthcare systems. Published quarterly, the journal supports research that explores: · Healthcare Operations Management · Medical Decision Making · Socio-Technical Systems Analysis related to healthcare · Quality Engineering · Healthcare Informatics · Healthcare Policy We are looking forward to accepting submissions that document the development and use of industrial and systems engineering tools and techniques including: · Healthcare operations research · Healthcare statistics · Healthcare information systems · Healthcare work measurement · Human factors/ergonomics applied to healthcare systems Research that explores the integration of these tools and techniques with those from other engineering and medical disciplines are also featured. We encourage the submission of clinical notes, or practice notes, to show the impact of contributions that will be published. We also encourage authors to collect an impact statement from their clinical partners to show the impact of research in the clinical practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信