{"title":"闽南语从斜格到核心格","authors":"Hilary Chappell","doi":"10.1075/jhl.21038.cha","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study sets out to discuss the evolution from oblique to core case as a manifestation of overtly-marked\n nominative-accusative alignment in Sinitic languages. This is due to the emergence of a type of ‘optional’ marking on preverbal\n direct objects in a construction type that has become widespread in Sinitic (Chappell &\n Verstraete 2019). In particular, I examine spoken discourse data from Taiwanese Southern Min whose comitative\n preposition, ka7\n , has grammaticalized into an optional object marker. It is argued that this marker is\n undergoing morphologization into a direct object index (doi) on the main verb in the predicate, subsequent to the\n omission of the resumptive pronoun it governs. The new index takes over this function of cross-referencing the lexical direct\n object, typically located in the immediately preceding discourse, if not in clause-initial position.\n In an epilogue, I also briefly treat the evolution of local cases such as the allative and the perlative to\n optional object markers in the Southern Min languages of Shantou and Jieyang, situated in Guangdong Province, China. Both of these\n are extremely rare sources in the Sinitic family, yet common in Tibeto-Burman and Romance languages. The approach adopted is in\n harmony with recent diachronic studies which target source morphosyntax in order to explain the emergence of a variety of\n synchronic patterns, all bearing similar discourse and grammatical functions (Cristofaro &\n Zúñiga 2018).","PeriodicalId":42165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From oblique to core case in the Southern Min languages\",\"authors\":\"Hilary Chappell\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jhl.21038.cha\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study sets out to discuss the evolution from oblique to core case as a manifestation of overtly-marked\\n nominative-accusative alignment in Sinitic languages. This is due to the emergence of a type of ‘optional’ marking on preverbal\\n direct objects in a construction type that has become widespread in Sinitic (Chappell &\\n Verstraete 2019). In particular, I examine spoken discourse data from Taiwanese Southern Min whose comitative\\n preposition, ka7\\n , has grammaticalized into an optional object marker. It is argued that this marker is\\n undergoing morphologization into a direct object index (doi) on the main verb in the predicate, subsequent to the\\n omission of the resumptive pronoun it governs. The new index takes over this function of cross-referencing the lexical direct\\n object, typically located in the immediately preceding discourse, if not in clause-initial position.\\n In an epilogue, I also briefly treat the evolution of local cases such as the allative and the perlative to\\n optional object markers in the Southern Min languages of Shantou and Jieyang, situated in Guangdong Province, China. Both of these\\n are extremely rare sources in the Sinitic family, yet common in Tibeto-Burman and Romance languages. The approach adopted is in\\n harmony with recent diachronic studies which target source morphosyntax in order to explain the emergence of a variety of\\n synchronic patterns, all bearing similar discourse and grammatical functions (Cristofaro &\\n Zúñiga 2018).\",\"PeriodicalId\":42165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historical Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historical Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.21038.cha\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.21038.cha","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
From oblique to core case in the Southern Min languages
This study sets out to discuss the evolution from oblique to core case as a manifestation of overtly-marked
nominative-accusative alignment in Sinitic languages. This is due to the emergence of a type of ‘optional’ marking on preverbal
direct objects in a construction type that has become widespread in Sinitic (Chappell &
Verstraete 2019). In particular, I examine spoken discourse data from Taiwanese Southern Min whose comitative
preposition, ka7
, has grammaticalized into an optional object marker. It is argued that this marker is
undergoing morphologization into a direct object index (doi) on the main verb in the predicate, subsequent to the
omission of the resumptive pronoun it governs. The new index takes over this function of cross-referencing the lexical direct
object, typically located in the immediately preceding discourse, if not in clause-initial position.
In an epilogue, I also briefly treat the evolution of local cases such as the allative and the perlative to
optional object markers in the Southern Min languages of Shantou and Jieyang, situated in Guangdong Province, China. Both of these
are extremely rare sources in the Sinitic family, yet common in Tibeto-Burman and Romance languages. The approach adopted is in
harmony with recent diachronic studies which target source morphosyntax in order to explain the emergence of a variety of
synchronic patterns, all bearing similar discourse and grammatical functions (Cristofaro &
Zúñiga 2018).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Historical Linguistics aims to publish, after peer-review, papers that make a significant contribution to the theory and/or methodology of historical linguistics. Papers dealing with any language or language family are welcome. Papers should have a diachronic orientation and should offer new perspectives, refine existing methodologies, or challenge received wisdom, on the basis of careful analysis of extant historical data. We are especially keen to publish work which links historical linguistics to corpus-based research, linguistic typology, language variation, language contact, or the study of language and cognition, all of which constitute a major source of methodological renewal for the discipline and shed light on aspects of language change. Contributions in areas such as diachronic corpus linguistics or diachronic typology are therefore particularly welcome.