图书馆与新冠肺炎:创新的机遇

IF 1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
M. Dobreva, H. Anghelescu
{"title":"图书馆与新冠肺炎:创新的机遇","authors":"M. Dobreva, H. Anghelescu","doi":"10.1177/03400352221077748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The initial measures to curb the spread of the virus resulted in far-reaching institutional closures. Multiple libraries across the globe closed, but this did not mean that they stopped serving their patrons – in reality, it meant that they had to redefine what services could be delivered online in addition to those that were already there. The library sector had experience from previous disasters, when people flocked in large numbers to libraries for shelter and support. Now, the challenge was to deal with the opposite – supporting patrons who were nowhere near the physical space of the library. At a time when libraries were expanding the variety of activities that help to define them as third places, suddenly the physical dimension of library use vanished. At this stage, a huge impact on libraries was that they started redefining the services they provided. For those institutions already on the path of digital transformation, the pandemic brought an additional set of considerations. For many libraries not yet working on digital transformation strategies, the pandemic was what pushed them onto that path (Garcia-Febo, 2021). The results of this process remain to be seen and understood. If we want to look into the evidence of what topics dominated professional thinking at this time, a helpful set of documents is the initial recommendations of the major library associations across the globe. Kosciejew (2020) offers an informative initial analysis of these plans and Figure 1 illustrates the timeline of their appearance.","PeriodicalId":45334,"journal":{"name":"IFLA JOURNAL-INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Libraries and COVID-19: Opportunities for innovation\",\"authors\":\"M. Dobreva, H. Anghelescu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03400352221077748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The initial measures to curb the spread of the virus resulted in far-reaching institutional closures. Multiple libraries across the globe closed, but this did not mean that they stopped serving their patrons – in reality, it meant that they had to redefine what services could be delivered online in addition to those that were already there. The library sector had experience from previous disasters, when people flocked in large numbers to libraries for shelter and support. Now, the challenge was to deal with the opposite – supporting patrons who were nowhere near the physical space of the library. At a time when libraries were expanding the variety of activities that help to define them as third places, suddenly the physical dimension of library use vanished. At this stage, a huge impact on libraries was that they started redefining the services they provided. For those institutions already on the path of digital transformation, the pandemic brought an additional set of considerations. For many libraries not yet working on digital transformation strategies, the pandemic was what pushed them onto that path (Garcia-Febo, 2021). The results of this process remain to be seen and understood. If we want to look into the evidence of what topics dominated professional thinking at this time, a helpful set of documents is the initial recommendations of the major library associations across the globe. Kosciejew (2020) offers an informative initial analysis of these plans and Figure 1 illustrates the timeline of their appearance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IFLA JOURNAL-INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IFLA JOURNAL-INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352221077748\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IFLA JOURNAL-INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352221077748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

遏制病毒传播的最初措施导致了影响深远的机构关闭。全球多家图书馆关闭,但这并不意味着他们停止为读者提供服务——事实上,这意味着他们必须重新定义除了现有服务之外,还可以在网上提供哪些服务。图书馆部门有以前灾难的经验,当时人们大量涌向图书馆寻求庇护和支持。现在,挑战在于应对相反的情况——支持那些远离图书馆物理空间的顾客。当图书馆扩大了有助于将其定义为第三场所的各种活动时,图书馆使用的物理维度突然消失了。在这个阶段,对图书馆的巨大影响是他们开始重新定义他们提供的服务。对于那些已经走上数字化转型道路的机构来说,疫情带来了一系列额外的考虑。对于许多尚未制定数字化转型战略的图书馆来说,疫情正是将他们推向这条道路的原因(Garcia Febo,2021)。这一过程的结果还有待观察和理解。如果我们想研究当时哪些主题主导了专业思维的证据,一组有用的文件是全球主要图书馆协会的初步建议。Kosciejew(2020)对这些计划进行了信息丰富的初步分析,图1说明了它们出现的时间线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Libraries and COVID-19: Opportunities for innovation
The initial measures to curb the spread of the virus resulted in far-reaching institutional closures. Multiple libraries across the globe closed, but this did not mean that they stopped serving their patrons – in reality, it meant that they had to redefine what services could be delivered online in addition to those that were already there. The library sector had experience from previous disasters, when people flocked in large numbers to libraries for shelter and support. Now, the challenge was to deal with the opposite – supporting patrons who were nowhere near the physical space of the library. At a time when libraries were expanding the variety of activities that help to define them as third places, suddenly the physical dimension of library use vanished. At this stage, a huge impact on libraries was that they started redefining the services they provided. For those institutions already on the path of digital transformation, the pandemic brought an additional set of considerations. For many libraries not yet working on digital transformation strategies, the pandemic was what pushed them onto that path (Garcia-Febo, 2021). The results of this process remain to be seen and understood. If we want to look into the evidence of what topics dominated professional thinking at this time, a helpful set of documents is the initial recommendations of the major library associations across the globe. Kosciejew (2020) offers an informative initial analysis of these plans and Figure 1 illustrates the timeline of their appearance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IFLA JOURNAL-INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONS
IFLA JOURNAL-INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONS INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: IFLA Journal is an international journal which publishes original peer reviewed articles, a selection of peer reviewed IFLA conference papers, and news of current IFLA activities. Content is selected to reflect the variety of the international information profession, ranging from freedom of access to information, knowledge management, services to the visually impaired and intellectual property. The IFLA Journal aims to promote and support the aims and core values of IFLA as the global voice of the library and information profession by providing authoritative coverage and analysis of the activities of IFLA and its various constituent bodies and members, and those of other bodies with similar aims and interests.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信