不再有伊拉克:分析奥巴马政府时期的武力使用决策

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Kelly A. McHugh
{"title":"不再有伊拉克:分析奥巴马政府时期的武力使用决策","authors":"Kelly A. McHugh","doi":"10.1080/14781158.2021.1867526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this article, I focus on a subset of Obama’s foreign policy views, namely his beliefs about the appropriate circumstances under which the United States should engage in armed conflict. I argue that the Iraq war served as a formative event in the development of Obama’s worldview. He derived distinct lessons from this policy failure, leading him to articulate a restrictive set of conditions that should be met before the United States considered intervening in the internal politics of another nation, absent a direct threat to national security. I undertake a detailed examination of two case studies – the administration’s debates leading to the 2011 intervention in Libya and the decision not to intervene in Syria in 2013 – and demonstrate how the lessons of Iraq shaped Obama’s policy choices at critical junctures in the deliberations.","PeriodicalId":44867,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Peace & Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14781158.2021.1867526","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No more Iraqs: analysing use of force decisions during the Obama administration\",\"authors\":\"Kelly A. McHugh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14781158.2021.1867526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this article, I focus on a subset of Obama’s foreign policy views, namely his beliefs about the appropriate circumstances under which the United States should engage in armed conflict. I argue that the Iraq war served as a formative event in the development of Obama’s worldview. He derived distinct lessons from this policy failure, leading him to articulate a restrictive set of conditions that should be met before the United States considered intervening in the internal politics of another nation, absent a direct threat to national security. I undertake a detailed examination of two case studies – the administration’s debates leading to the 2011 intervention in Libya and the decision not to intervene in Syria in 2013 – and demonstrate how the lessons of Iraq shaped Obama’s policy choices at critical junctures in the deliberations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Peace & Security\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14781158.2021.1867526\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Peace & Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2021.1867526\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Peace & Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2021.1867526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我将重点讨论奥巴马外交政策观点的一个子集,即他对美国应该在什么情况下参与武装冲突的看法。我认为,伊拉克战争是奥巴马世界观形成的一个重要事件。他从这次政策失败中得到了独特的教训,这使他明确提出了一套限制性条件,在美国考虑干预另一个国家的内部政治之前,必须满足这些条件,除非对国家安全构成直接威胁。我对两个案例进行了详细的分析——2011年政府对利比亚的干预和2013年不干预叙利亚的决定——并展示了伊拉克的教训是如何在审议的关键时刻影响奥巴马的政策选择的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No more Iraqs: analysing use of force decisions during the Obama administration
ABSTRACT In this article, I focus on a subset of Obama’s foreign policy views, namely his beliefs about the appropriate circumstances under which the United States should engage in armed conflict. I argue that the Iraq war served as a formative event in the development of Obama’s worldview. He derived distinct lessons from this policy failure, leading him to articulate a restrictive set of conditions that should be met before the United States considered intervening in the internal politics of another nation, absent a direct threat to national security. I undertake a detailed examination of two case studies – the administration’s debates leading to the 2011 intervention in Libya and the decision not to intervene in Syria in 2013 – and demonstrate how the lessons of Iraq shaped Obama’s policy choices at critical junctures in the deliberations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Peace & Security
Global Change Peace & Security POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信