18F-FDG PET/CT作为评估脊柱结核患者持续升高的感染标志物的一种方式

Q4 Medicine
J. Davis, M. Burger, G. Pienaar, R. Lamberts
{"title":"18F-FDG PET/CT作为评估脊柱结核患者持续升高的感染标志物的一种方式","authors":"J. Davis, M. Burger, G. Pienaar, R. Lamberts","doi":"10.17159/2309-8309/2020/v19n1a3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: The aim of the study was to investigate the differences in participant characteristics between positive and negative, positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose integrated with computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) activity at the spinal tuberculosis (TB) site following 12 months of the appropriate chemotherapy therapy for spinal TB. A secondary aim of the study was to determine whether erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels could be used as a reliable marker of TB activity and/or treatment success of spinal TB, especially in a high HIV-positive population. \nPatients and methods: All patients who were treated for spinal TB and underwent an 18F-FDG PET/CT scan were considered for inclusion. PET/CT positive patients underwent a spinal biopsy which was sent for microscopy, Gram staining, Gene Xpert (GXP) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and histology. Patients in the PET/CT positive group underwent a repeat MRI scan and biopsy at the completion of treatment to investigate the potential presence of resistance or ongoing active spinal TB. \nResults: A total of 18 patients were included in the study: five patients were allocated to the PET/CT positive group and 13 to the PET/CT negative group. The PET/CT negative group was significantly older (p=0.016) and had significantly fewer TB-infected vertebrae (p=0.010) than the PET/CT positive group. Two patients, one in each group, were found to have drug-resistant spinal TB. At the 12-month follow-up visit, two patients (40%) in the PET/CT positive group and three patients (30%) in the PET/CT negative group were still complaining of back pain. All smear microscopy results of the PET/CT positive patients who underwent a repeat biopsy were negative after the conclusion of treatment; culture results (n=4/4) were also negative. GXP PCR results were positive in four and negative in one case. Only one of four samples showed classic TB signs on histology. \nConclusion: This study is the first to report on biopsies done from a PET/CT positive site, after 12 months of anti-tubercular treatment. It is not unlikely that PET/CT is over-sensitive and can show metabolic activity in areas of sterile inflammation, and future studies are necessary to evaluate this. \nLevel of evidence: Level 3","PeriodicalId":32220,"journal":{"name":"SA Orthopaedic Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"23-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"18F-FDG PET/CT as a modality for the evaluation of persisting raised infective markers in patients with spinal tuberculosis\",\"authors\":\"J. Davis, M. Burger, G. Pienaar, R. Lamberts\",\"doi\":\"10.17159/2309-8309/2020/v19n1a3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims: The aim of the study was to investigate the differences in participant characteristics between positive and negative, positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose integrated with computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) activity at the spinal tuberculosis (TB) site following 12 months of the appropriate chemotherapy therapy for spinal TB. A secondary aim of the study was to determine whether erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels could be used as a reliable marker of TB activity and/or treatment success of spinal TB, especially in a high HIV-positive population. \\nPatients and methods: All patients who were treated for spinal TB and underwent an 18F-FDG PET/CT scan were considered for inclusion. PET/CT positive patients underwent a spinal biopsy which was sent for microscopy, Gram staining, Gene Xpert (GXP) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and histology. Patients in the PET/CT positive group underwent a repeat MRI scan and biopsy at the completion of treatment to investigate the potential presence of resistance or ongoing active spinal TB. \\nResults: A total of 18 patients were included in the study: five patients were allocated to the PET/CT positive group and 13 to the PET/CT negative group. The PET/CT negative group was significantly older (p=0.016) and had significantly fewer TB-infected vertebrae (p=0.010) than the PET/CT positive group. Two patients, one in each group, were found to have drug-resistant spinal TB. At the 12-month follow-up visit, two patients (40%) in the PET/CT positive group and three patients (30%) in the PET/CT negative group were still complaining of back pain. All smear microscopy results of the PET/CT positive patients who underwent a repeat biopsy were negative after the conclusion of treatment; culture results (n=4/4) were also negative. GXP PCR results were positive in four and negative in one case. Only one of four samples showed classic TB signs on histology. \\nConclusion: This study is the first to report on biopsies done from a PET/CT positive site, after 12 months of anti-tubercular treatment. It is not unlikely that PET/CT is over-sensitive and can show metabolic activity in areas of sterile inflammation, and future studies are necessary to evaluate this. \\nLevel of evidence: Level 3\",\"PeriodicalId\":32220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SA Orthopaedic Journal\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"23-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SA Orthopaedic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-8309/2020/v19n1a3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Orthopaedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-8309/2020/v19n1a3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是研究在对脊柱结核进行适当化疗12个月后,阳性和阴性参与者特征的差异,正电子发射断层扫描与2-脱氧-2-[氟-18]氟-d -葡萄糖结合计算机断层扫描(18F-FDG PET/CT)在脊柱结核(TB)部位的活性。该研究的第二个目的是确定红细胞沉降率(ESR)水平是否可以作为结核病活动和/或脊柱结核治疗成功的可靠标志,特别是在艾滋病毒高阳性人群中。患者和方法:所有接受脊柱结核治疗并接受18F-FDG PET/CT扫描的患者均被纳入研究。PET/CT阳性患者接受脊柱活检,并进行显微镜检查、革兰氏染色、基因Xpert (GXP)聚合酶链反应(PCR)和组织学检查。PET/CT阳性组的患者在治疗结束时进行了重复MRI扫描和活检,以调查是否存在耐药性或正在进行的活动性脊柱结核。结果:共纳入18例患者,其中PET/CT阳性组5例,PET/CT阴性组13例。与PET/CT阳性组相比,PET/CT阴性组年龄明显增加(p=0.016),结核感染椎体数量明显减少(p=0.010)。两名患者,每组一名,被发现患有耐药脊柱结核。随访12个月时,PET/CT阳性组2例(40%)患者和PET/CT阴性组3例(30%)患者仍主诉背部疼痛。治疗结束后,PET/CT阳性患者重复活检的涂片镜检结果均为阴性;培养结果(n=4/4)也为阴性。GXP PCR结果4例阳性,1例阴性。四个样本中只有一个在组织学上显示出典型的结核病征象。结论:这项研究首次报道了在接受12个月的抗结核治疗后,从PET/CT阳性部位进行的活检。PET/CT可能过于敏感,可能显示无菌炎症区域的代谢活动,未来的研究需要对此进行评估。证据等级:三级
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
18F-FDG PET/CT as a modality for the evaluation of persisting raised infective markers in patients with spinal tuberculosis
Aims: The aim of the study was to investigate the differences in participant characteristics between positive and negative, positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose integrated with computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) activity at the spinal tuberculosis (TB) site following 12 months of the appropriate chemotherapy therapy for spinal TB. A secondary aim of the study was to determine whether erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels could be used as a reliable marker of TB activity and/or treatment success of spinal TB, especially in a high HIV-positive population. Patients and methods: All patients who were treated for spinal TB and underwent an 18F-FDG PET/CT scan were considered for inclusion. PET/CT positive patients underwent a spinal biopsy which was sent for microscopy, Gram staining, Gene Xpert (GXP) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and histology. Patients in the PET/CT positive group underwent a repeat MRI scan and biopsy at the completion of treatment to investigate the potential presence of resistance or ongoing active spinal TB. Results: A total of 18 patients were included in the study: five patients were allocated to the PET/CT positive group and 13 to the PET/CT negative group. The PET/CT negative group was significantly older (p=0.016) and had significantly fewer TB-infected vertebrae (p=0.010) than the PET/CT positive group. Two patients, one in each group, were found to have drug-resistant spinal TB. At the 12-month follow-up visit, two patients (40%) in the PET/CT positive group and three patients (30%) in the PET/CT negative group were still complaining of back pain. All smear microscopy results of the PET/CT positive patients who underwent a repeat biopsy were negative after the conclusion of treatment; culture results (n=4/4) were also negative. GXP PCR results were positive in four and negative in one case. Only one of four samples showed classic TB signs on histology. Conclusion: This study is the first to report on biopsies done from a PET/CT positive site, after 12 months of anti-tubercular treatment. It is not unlikely that PET/CT is over-sensitive and can show metabolic activity in areas of sterile inflammation, and future studies are necessary to evaluate this. Level of evidence: Level 3
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SA Orthopaedic Journal
SA Orthopaedic Journal Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信