双重清算信贷的估计损失(PECLD):新账户监管对巴西循环消费行业公司的影响

Jéssica dos Santos Santana, Lúcio de Souza Machado, M. Machado, Emerson Santana de Souza
{"title":"双重清算信贷的估计损失(PECLD):新账户监管对巴西循环消费行业公司的影响","authors":"Jéssica dos Santos Santana, Lúcio de Souza Machado, M. Machado, Emerson Santana de Souza","doi":"10.51320/RMC.V22I1.1191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The general objective of the study was to assess whether there was a relevant impact on the estimated loss on doubtful debts (PECLD) with the new accounting regulation, CPC 48, which changed the calculation system, from a model based on losses incurred to another on losses expected, in publicly-held companies classified in the Cyclic Consumer sector of B3. For this, statistical tests were carried out with quarterly data from the year before the standard, 2017, with the corresponding quarters of the initial year of the standard, 2018. Also, the PECLD of audited and unaudited companies by Big was analyzed, with the same premises. Four and from companies classified under differentiated levels of corporate governance at B3 and not classified. The statistical tests carried out show that the PECLD for the 2018 quarters were statistically different from the values determined by the previous system, showing that the change seems to have contributed to reflect a better scenario. The same was found when considering the companies audited by the Big Four and which were classified in different levels of governance. The study contributes to the regulatory entities and users of accounting information, by showing that, in the sample studied, a change in practice was necessary, as there was a relevant change in the numbers of the PECLD compared to the previous scenario. Also, the study opens the way for new investigations that include this accounting item, such as, for example, those in earnings management, which use it as a proxy in some of its models.","PeriodicalId":30991,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mineira de Contabilidade","volume":"22 1","pages":"56-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PERDA ESTIMADA COM CRÉDITOS DE LIQUIDAÇÃO DUVIDOSA (PECLD): IMPACTO DA NOVA REGULAÇÃO CONTÁBIL NAS COMPANHIAS BRASILEIRAS DO SETOR DE CONSUMO CÍCLICO\",\"authors\":\"Jéssica dos Santos Santana, Lúcio de Souza Machado, M. Machado, Emerson Santana de Souza\",\"doi\":\"10.51320/RMC.V22I1.1191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The general objective of the study was to assess whether there was a relevant impact on the estimated loss on doubtful debts (PECLD) with the new accounting regulation, CPC 48, which changed the calculation system, from a model based on losses incurred to another on losses expected, in publicly-held companies classified in the Cyclic Consumer sector of B3. For this, statistical tests were carried out with quarterly data from the year before the standard, 2017, with the corresponding quarters of the initial year of the standard, 2018. Also, the PECLD of audited and unaudited companies by Big was analyzed, with the same premises. Four and from companies classified under differentiated levels of corporate governance at B3 and not classified. The statistical tests carried out show that the PECLD for the 2018 quarters were statistically different from the values determined by the previous system, showing that the change seems to have contributed to reflect a better scenario. The same was found when considering the companies audited by the Big Four and which were classified in different levels of governance. The study contributes to the regulatory entities and users of accounting information, by showing that, in the sample studied, a change in practice was necessary, as there was a relevant change in the numbers of the PECLD compared to the previous scenario. Also, the study opens the way for new investigations that include this accounting item, such as, for example, those in earnings management, which use it as a proxy in some of its models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Mineira de Contabilidade\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"56-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Mineira de Contabilidade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51320/RMC.V22I1.1191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Mineira de Contabilidade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51320/RMC.V22I1.1191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究的总体目标是评估新会计法规CPC 48是否对可疑债务的估计损失产生了相关影响,该法规将B3周期性消费者部门的上市公司的计算系统从基于已发生损失的模型改为基于预期损失的模型。为此,对标准前一年(2017年)的季度数据和标准初始年(2018年)的相应季度进行了统计测试。此外,在相同的前提下,对Big的经审计和未经审计公司的PECLD进行了分析。四家和来自B3级公司治理差异化级别下未分类的公司。进行的统计测试显示,2018季度的PECLD与之前系统确定的值在统计上有所不同,这表明这一变化似乎有助于反映更好的情况。在考虑四大公司审计的公司时也发现了同样的情况,这些公司被划分为不同的治理级别。该研究表明,在所研究的样本中,由于PECLD的数量与之前的情况相比发生了相关变化,因此有必要改变实践,从而有助于监管实体和会计信息用户。此外,这项研究为包括这一会计项目的新调查开辟了道路,例如,盈余管理领域的调查,在其一些模型中使用它作为代理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PERDA ESTIMADA COM CRÉDITOS DE LIQUIDAÇÃO DUVIDOSA (PECLD): IMPACTO DA NOVA REGULAÇÃO CONTÁBIL NAS COMPANHIAS BRASILEIRAS DO SETOR DE CONSUMO CÍCLICO
The general objective of the study was to assess whether there was a relevant impact on the estimated loss on doubtful debts (PECLD) with the new accounting regulation, CPC 48, which changed the calculation system, from a model based on losses incurred to another on losses expected, in publicly-held companies classified in the Cyclic Consumer sector of B3. For this, statistical tests were carried out with quarterly data from the year before the standard, 2017, with the corresponding quarters of the initial year of the standard, 2018. Also, the PECLD of audited and unaudited companies by Big was analyzed, with the same premises. Four and from companies classified under differentiated levels of corporate governance at B3 and not classified. The statistical tests carried out show that the PECLD for the 2018 quarters were statistically different from the values determined by the previous system, showing that the change seems to have contributed to reflect a better scenario. The same was found when considering the companies audited by the Big Four and which were classified in different levels of governance. The study contributes to the regulatory entities and users of accounting information, by showing that, in the sample studied, a change in practice was necessary, as there was a relevant change in the numbers of the PECLD compared to the previous scenario. Also, the study opens the way for new investigations that include this accounting item, such as, for example, those in earnings management, which use it as a proxy in some of its models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信