论阿利乌斯·阿里斯蒂德“论萨拉皮斯”的同一性与差异性

Q1 Arts and Humanities

Advances in the History of Rhetoric Pub Date : 2019-05-01 DOI:10.1080/15362426.2019.1618056

Janet M. Atwill, Josie Portz

{"title":"论阿利乌斯·阿里斯蒂德“论萨拉皮斯”的同一性与差异性","authors":"Janet M. Atwill, Josie Portz","doi":"10.1080/15362426.2019.1618056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article posits that bringing diversity to histories of rhetoric may require not only revising canons but also “unwriting” the narratives of Western civilization in which canonical figures have been cast. Two conventions of these narratives are of special significance: fixed identities and narrative coherence. Focusing on the cultural contexts of Aelius Aristides’ “Regarding Sarapis,” we suggest that these conventions obscure the cultural differences that were always there.","PeriodicalId":38049,"journal":{"name":"Advances in the History of Rhetoric","volume":"22 1","pages":"179 - 193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15362426.2019.1618056","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identity and Difference in Aelius Aristides’ “Regarding Sarapis”\",\"authors\":\"Janet M. Atwill, Josie Portz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15362426.2019.1618056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article posits that bringing diversity to histories of rhetoric may require not only revising canons but also “unwriting” the narratives of Western civilization in which canonical figures have been cast. Two conventions of these narratives are of special significance: fixed identities and narrative coherence. Focusing on the cultural contexts of Aelius Aristides’ “Regarding Sarapis,” we suggest that these conventions obscure the cultural differences that were always there.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in the History of Rhetoric\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"179 - 193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15362426.2019.1618056\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in the History of Rhetoric\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15362426.2019.1618056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in the History of Rhetoric","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15362426.2019.1618056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文认为，为修辞学史带来多样性，不仅需要修改经典，还需要“改写”西方文明中塑造经典人物的叙事。这些叙事的两个惯例具有特殊意义：固定身份和叙事连贯性。着眼于阿留斯·阿里斯蒂德的《关于萨拉皮斯》的文化背景，我们认为这些习俗掩盖了一直存在的文化差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Identity and Difference in Aelius Aristides’ “Regarding Sarapis”

ABSTRACT This article posits that bringing diversity to histories of rhetoric may require not only revising canons but also “unwriting” the narratives of Western civilization in which canonical figures have been cast. Two conventions of these narratives are of special significance: fixed identities and narrative coherence. Focusing on the cultural contexts of Aelius Aristides’ “Regarding Sarapis,” we suggest that these conventions obscure the cultural differences that were always there.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Advances in the History of Rhetoric Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量