“英格兰的悲伤从哪里开始”:对1642年波威克桥战役的重新评估

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
J. Spiller
{"title":"“英格兰的悲伤从哪里开始”:对1642年波威克桥战役的重新评估","authors":"J. Spiller","doi":"10.1080/0047729X.2021.2024659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article seeks to provide a comprehensive reassessment of the battle of Powick Bridge by focusing on all surviving eye-witness testimonies, unlike previous accounts, and by examining the engagement in its own right, rather than simply as a prelude or sideshow to the events at Edgehill a month later. Particular attention is given to the theory that some sort of false message was sent by the Royalist leader Prince Rupert to the Parliamentarian troops to lure them into a trap, which has been generally overlooked or dismissed by many writers, while the problems with the Earl of Clarendon’s narrative of events and his legacy regarding source interpretation, are also considered carefully. The article concludes that the action at Powick Bridge was far from being the chance-encounter of minor significance which secondary accounts have broadly maintained it was, and that the battle therefore merits more attention than it has previously been given.","PeriodicalId":41013,"journal":{"name":"Midland History","volume":"47 1","pages":"21 - 37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Where England’s Sorrows Began’: A Reassessment of the Battle of Powick Bridge, 1642\",\"authors\":\"J. Spiller\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0047729X.2021.2024659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article seeks to provide a comprehensive reassessment of the battle of Powick Bridge by focusing on all surviving eye-witness testimonies, unlike previous accounts, and by examining the engagement in its own right, rather than simply as a prelude or sideshow to the events at Edgehill a month later. Particular attention is given to the theory that some sort of false message was sent by the Royalist leader Prince Rupert to the Parliamentarian troops to lure them into a trap, which has been generally overlooked or dismissed by many writers, while the problems with the Earl of Clarendon’s narrative of events and his legacy regarding source interpretation, are also considered carefully. The article concludes that the action at Powick Bridge was far from being the chance-encounter of minor significance which secondary accounts have broadly maintained it was, and that the battle therefore merits more attention than it has previously been given.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Midland History\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"21 - 37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Midland History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0047729X.2021.2024659\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midland History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0047729X.2021.2024659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文旨在对波威克大桥战役进行全面的重新评估,重点关注所有幸存的目击者证词,而不是之前的描述,并通过审查交战本身,而不仅仅是一个月后埃奇希尔事件的前奏或花絮。特别注意的是,保皇党领袖鲁珀特王子向议员部队发送了某种虚假信息,以引诱他们落入陷阱,这一理论通常被许多作家忽视或驳回,而克拉伦登伯爵对事件的叙述及其在来源解释方面的遗产问题也被仔细考虑。这篇文章的结论是,波威克大桥的行动远不是次要的偶然遭遇,次要的报道普遍认为这是一次偶然的遭遇,因此这场战斗比以前更值得关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Where England’s Sorrows Began’: A Reassessment of the Battle of Powick Bridge, 1642
ABSTRACT This article seeks to provide a comprehensive reassessment of the battle of Powick Bridge by focusing on all surviving eye-witness testimonies, unlike previous accounts, and by examining the engagement in its own right, rather than simply as a prelude or sideshow to the events at Edgehill a month later. Particular attention is given to the theory that some sort of false message was sent by the Royalist leader Prince Rupert to the Parliamentarian troops to lure them into a trap, which has been generally overlooked or dismissed by many writers, while the problems with the Earl of Clarendon’s narrative of events and his legacy regarding source interpretation, are also considered carefully. The article concludes that the action at Powick Bridge was far from being the chance-encounter of minor significance which secondary accounts have broadly maintained it was, and that the battle therefore merits more attention than it has previously been given.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Midland History
Midland History HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信