即刻术中显微外科修复喉返神经:15年的机构经验

J. McGraw, Corey M. Bascone, I. Jaimez, Carlos E. Barrero, J. Fosnot, D. Fraker, S. Kovach
{"title":"即刻术中显微外科修复喉返神经:15年的机构经验","authors":"J. McGraw, Corey M. Bascone, I. Jaimez, Carlos E. Barrero, J. Fosnot, D. Fraker, S. Kovach","doi":"10.1055/a-2004-0113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background  Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury carries significant morbidity. Microsurgical repair of the RLN has proven promising for enhancing patient recovery of vocal function; however, data remains limited. Methods  This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent RLN repair from 2007 to 2022. Demographics and medical history were collected. The location and etiology of RLN injury, as well as the repair technique, were collected. Follow-up data were collected at the initial postoperative visit, at 6 months and at 1 year. Hoarseness was classified as mild, moderate, or severe. Of patients who underwent nasopharyngolaryngoscopy (NPL) following repair, the glottic gap was measured. Vocal interventions performed were also recorded. This study utilized descriptive statistical methods. Results  Eleven patients underwent RLN repair. All patients underwent immediate repair. Fifty-four percent ( n  = 6) of RLN injuries resulted from tumor inflammation or nerve encasement. Eighty-two percent ( n  = 9) underwent direct RLN coaptation, 9% ( n  = 1) underwent vagus-RLN anastomosis, and 9% ( n  = 1) underwent an interposition nerve graft. Technical success was 100%. Seventy-three percent ( n  = 8) required otolaryngology referral, and of those, 50% ( n  = 4) required intervention. At initial evaluation, 91% ( n  = 10) suffered from mild to severe hoarseness, and of patients who underwent NPL, all had a glottic gap. At 1 year, 82% of patients ( n  = 9) improved to having mild to no appreciable hoarseness. Of the patients who underwent NPL, 62% ( n  = 5) had closure of the glottic gap. Conclusion  Patients undergoing repair of the RLN following injury showed excellent recovery of vocal function and resolution of glottic gap at 1 year.","PeriodicalId":34024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery Open","volume":"08 1","pages":"e32 - e37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immediate Intraoperative Microsurgical Repair of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve: A Fifteen-Year Institutional Experience\",\"authors\":\"J. McGraw, Corey M. Bascone, I. Jaimez, Carlos E. Barrero, J. Fosnot, D. Fraker, S. Kovach\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2004-0113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background  Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury carries significant morbidity. Microsurgical repair of the RLN has proven promising for enhancing patient recovery of vocal function; however, data remains limited. Methods  This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent RLN repair from 2007 to 2022. Demographics and medical history were collected. The location and etiology of RLN injury, as well as the repair technique, were collected. Follow-up data were collected at the initial postoperative visit, at 6 months and at 1 year. Hoarseness was classified as mild, moderate, or severe. Of patients who underwent nasopharyngolaryngoscopy (NPL) following repair, the glottic gap was measured. Vocal interventions performed were also recorded. This study utilized descriptive statistical methods. Results  Eleven patients underwent RLN repair. All patients underwent immediate repair. Fifty-four percent ( n  = 6) of RLN injuries resulted from tumor inflammation or nerve encasement. Eighty-two percent ( n  = 9) underwent direct RLN coaptation, 9% ( n  = 1) underwent vagus-RLN anastomosis, and 9% ( n  = 1) underwent an interposition nerve graft. Technical success was 100%. Seventy-three percent ( n  = 8) required otolaryngology referral, and of those, 50% ( n  = 4) required intervention. At initial evaluation, 91% ( n  = 10) suffered from mild to severe hoarseness, and of patients who underwent NPL, all had a glottic gap. At 1 year, 82% of patients ( n  = 9) improved to having mild to no appreciable hoarseness. Of the patients who underwent NPL, 62% ( n  = 5) had closure of the glottic gap. Conclusion  Patients undergoing repair of the RLN following injury showed excellent recovery of vocal function and resolution of glottic gap at 1 year.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery Open\",\"volume\":\"08 1\",\"pages\":\"e32 - e37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2004-0113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2004-0113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景喉返神经(RLN)损伤发病率高。显微外科修复RLN已被证明有希望提高患者的声带功能恢复;然而,数据仍然有限。方法回顾性队列研究包括2007年至2022年接受RLN修复的患者。收集人口统计资料和病史。收集RLN损伤的部位、病因及修复方法。随访数据收集于术后首次就诊、6个月和1年。声音嘶哑分为轻度、中度和重度。修复后接受鼻咽喉镜检查(NPL)的患者测量声门间隙。进行的声音干预也被记录下来。本研究采用描述性统计方法。结果11例患者行RLN修复术。所有患者均立即进行修复。54% (n = 6)的RLN损伤是由肿瘤炎症或神经包裹引起的。82% (n = 9)接受直接RLN吻合,9% (n = 1)接受迷走神经-RLN吻合,9% (n = 1)接受间置神经移植。技术上的成功率是100%。73% (n = 8)需要耳鼻喉科转诊,其中50% (n = 4)需要干预。在初步评估时,91% (n = 10)患有轻度至重度声音嘶哑,并且在接受NPL的患者中,所有患者都有声门间隙。1年后,82%的患者(n = 9)改善为轻度或无明显的声音嘶哑。在接受NPL的患者中,62% (n = 5)的声门间隙闭合。结论损伤后行声带修复术的患者在术后1年内声带功能恢复良好,声门间隙消除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immediate Intraoperative Microsurgical Repair of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve: A Fifteen-Year Institutional Experience
Abstract Background  Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury carries significant morbidity. Microsurgical repair of the RLN has proven promising for enhancing patient recovery of vocal function; however, data remains limited. Methods  This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent RLN repair from 2007 to 2022. Demographics and medical history were collected. The location and etiology of RLN injury, as well as the repair technique, were collected. Follow-up data were collected at the initial postoperative visit, at 6 months and at 1 year. Hoarseness was classified as mild, moderate, or severe. Of patients who underwent nasopharyngolaryngoscopy (NPL) following repair, the glottic gap was measured. Vocal interventions performed were also recorded. This study utilized descriptive statistical methods. Results  Eleven patients underwent RLN repair. All patients underwent immediate repair. Fifty-four percent ( n  = 6) of RLN injuries resulted from tumor inflammation or nerve encasement. Eighty-two percent ( n  = 9) underwent direct RLN coaptation, 9% ( n  = 1) underwent vagus-RLN anastomosis, and 9% ( n  = 1) underwent an interposition nerve graft. Technical success was 100%. Seventy-three percent ( n  = 8) required otolaryngology referral, and of those, 50% ( n  = 4) required intervention. At initial evaluation, 91% ( n  = 10) suffered from mild to severe hoarseness, and of patients who underwent NPL, all had a glottic gap. At 1 year, 82% of patients ( n  = 9) improved to having mild to no appreciable hoarseness. Of the patients who underwent NPL, 62% ( n  = 5) had closure of the glottic gap. Conclusion  Patients undergoing repair of the RLN following injury showed excellent recovery of vocal function and resolution of glottic gap at 1 year.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信