论关系补语与关系代词

IF 0.3 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Linguistic Variation Pub Date : 2018-12-31 DOI:10.1075/LV.16002.POL

C. Poletto, Emanuela Sanfelici

{"title":"论关系补语与关系代词","authors":"C. Poletto, Emanuela Sanfelici","doi":"10.1075/LV.16002.POL","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper explores the syntactic status of che and (il)\n qual(e) relativizers, i.e. what are standardly referred to as relative complementizers and\n relative pronouns, in Old and Modern Italian and Italian varieties and proposes a unified analysis for both types of items. It\n takes into account the ongoing debate regarding the categorial status of relativizers (Kayne\n 1975, 2008, 2010; Lehmann 1984; Manzini & Savoia 2003, 2011, among many others) and aims at showing that what we call complementizers are not\n C0 heads, as commonly assumed. Instead, we propose that both relative “complementizers” and “pronouns” have the\n same categorial status, i.e. they are wh-items and are part of the relative clause-internal head.","PeriodicalId":53947,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Variation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On relative complementizers and relative pronouns\",\"authors\":\"C. Poletto, Emanuela Sanfelici\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/LV.16002.POL\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper explores the syntactic status of che and (il)\\n qual(e) relativizers, i.e. what are standardly referred to as relative complementizers and\\n relative pronouns, in Old and Modern Italian and Italian varieties and proposes a unified analysis for both types of items. It\\n takes into account the ongoing debate regarding the categorial status of relativizers (Kayne\\n 1975, 2008, 2010; Lehmann 1984; Manzini & Savoia 2003, 2011, among many others) and aims at showing that what we call complementizers are not\\n C0 heads, as commonly assumed. Instead, we propose that both relative “complementizers” and “pronouns” have the\\n same categorial status, i.e. they are wh-items and are part of the relative clause-internal head.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Variation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Variation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/LV.16002.POL\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Variation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/LV.16002.POL","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

摘要

本文探讨了“che”和“(il) qual(e)”相对助词，即标准意义上的关系补语和关系代词，在古、现代意大利语和意大利语变体中的句法地位，并对这两类助词进行了统一分析。它考虑到正在进行的关于相对论者类别地位的辩论(Kayne 1975, 2008, 2010;莱曼1984;Manzini & Savoia 2003, 2011，以及其他许多人)，旨在表明我们所说的补语不是像通常认为的那样是C0头。相反，我们认为关系“补语”和“代词”具有相同的范畴地位，即它们都是wh项目，是关系从句内头的一部分。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

On relative complementizers and relative pronouns

This paper explores the syntactic status of che and (il) qual(e) relativizers, i.e. what are standardly referred to as relative complementizers and relative pronouns, in Old and Modern Italian and Italian varieties and proposes a unified analysis for both types of items. It takes into account the ongoing debate regarding the categorial status of relativizers (Kayne 1975, 2008, 2010; Lehmann 1984; Manzini & Savoia 2003, 2011, among many others) and aims at showing that what we call complementizers are not C0 heads, as commonly assumed. Instead, we propose that both relative “complementizers” and “pronouns” have the same categorial status, i.e. they are wh-items and are part of the relative clause-internal head.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Linguistic Variation LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Linguistic Variation is an international, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on the study of linguistic variation. It seeks to investigate to what extent the study of linguistic variation can shed light on the broader issue of language-particular versus language-universal properties, on the interaction between what is fixed and necessary on the one hand and what is variable and contingent on the other. This enterprise involves properly defining and delineating the notion of linguistic variation by identifying loci of variation. What are the variable properties of natural language and what is its invariant core?