{"title":"最后一天的未知行为和诺里奇的朱利安的末世论解释学","authors":"Erin Risch Zoutendam","doi":"10.1080/20465726.2023.2198377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Julian of Norwich’s deference to the teachings of ‘holy church’ – despite the divergence of these teachings from her own revelations – is a well-known stumbling block for scholars. Some accept her stated obedience as sincere, while others dismiss it as insincere, a rhetorical ploy for disseminating her theological beliefs without alarming the religious authorities of her day. This article proposes a new way of understanding Julian’s deference. I argue that Julian presumed an unknown eschatological event – ‘a deed the whych the blessydfulle trynyte shalle do in the last day … vnknowen of alle creaturys’ – that would precipitate a reinterpretation of the teachings of holy church, just as the coming of Christ was understood by medieval Christians to have precipitated a reinterpretation of the Old Testament. This eschatological reinterpretation would reconcile seemingly intractable tensions between Julian’s revelations and the teachings of ‘holy church.’","PeriodicalId":40432,"journal":{"name":"Medieval Mystical Theology","volume":"32 1","pages":"46 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Unknown Deed of the Last Day and Julian of Norwich’s Eschatological Hermeneutic in the Showings\",\"authors\":\"Erin Risch Zoutendam\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20465726.2023.2198377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Julian of Norwich’s deference to the teachings of ‘holy church’ – despite the divergence of these teachings from her own revelations – is a well-known stumbling block for scholars. Some accept her stated obedience as sincere, while others dismiss it as insincere, a rhetorical ploy for disseminating her theological beliefs without alarming the religious authorities of her day. This article proposes a new way of understanding Julian’s deference. I argue that Julian presumed an unknown eschatological event – ‘a deed the whych the blessydfulle trynyte shalle do in the last day … vnknowen of alle creaturys’ – that would precipitate a reinterpretation of the teachings of holy church, just as the coming of Christ was understood by medieval Christians to have precipitated a reinterpretation of the Old Testament. This eschatological reinterpretation would reconcile seemingly intractable tensions between Julian’s revelations and the teachings of ‘holy church.’\",\"PeriodicalId\":40432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medieval Mystical Theology\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"46 - 57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medieval Mystical Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20465726.2023.2198377\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medieval Mystical Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20465726.2023.2198377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:诺里奇的朱利安对“神圣教会”教义的尊重——尽管这些教义与她自己的启示不同——是学者们众所周知的绊脚石。一些人认为她所说的服从是真诚的,而另一些人则认为这是不真诚的,这是一种在不惊动当时宗教权威的情况下传播她的神学信仰的修辞策略。本文提出了一种理解朱利安顺从的新方法。我认为朱利安推测了一个未知的末世论事件——“这是上帝在最后一天应该做的事 … vnknown of alle creaturys’——这将促成对圣教教义的重新解释,就像中世纪基督徒认为基督的降临促成了对《旧约》的重新解释一样。这种末世论的重新解释将调和朱利安的启示和“神圣教会”教义之间看似棘手的紧张关系
The Unknown Deed of the Last Day and Julian of Norwich’s Eschatological Hermeneutic in the Showings
ABSTRACT Julian of Norwich’s deference to the teachings of ‘holy church’ – despite the divergence of these teachings from her own revelations – is a well-known stumbling block for scholars. Some accept her stated obedience as sincere, while others dismiss it as insincere, a rhetorical ploy for disseminating her theological beliefs without alarming the religious authorities of her day. This article proposes a new way of understanding Julian’s deference. I argue that Julian presumed an unknown eschatological event – ‘a deed the whych the blessydfulle trynyte shalle do in the last day … vnknowen of alle creaturys’ – that would precipitate a reinterpretation of the teachings of holy church, just as the coming of Christ was understood by medieval Christians to have precipitated a reinterpretation of the Old Testament. This eschatological reinterpretation would reconcile seemingly intractable tensions between Julian’s revelations and the teachings of ‘holy church.’