坚持传统:顺性别、异性恋母亲和父亲在选择性共同养育安排中的经历

IF 1.4 4区 社会学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Journal of Family Studies Pub Date : 2023-05-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/13229400.2023.2209060
Susie Bower-Brown, Sarah Foley, Vasanti Jadva, Susan Golombok
{"title":"坚持传统:顺性别、异性恋母亲和父亲在选择性共同养育安排中的经历","authors":"Susie Bower-Brown, Sarah Foley, Vasanti Jadva, Susan Golombok","doi":"10.1080/13229400.2023.2209060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Elective co-parenting families, meaning two (or more parents) who are not in a romantic relationship having a child together, are becoming more common amongst cisgender, heterosexual parents. The study of elective co-parenting families offers researchers a unique opportunity to decouple co-parenting relationships from romantic relationships, but little research to date has explored their experiences. This study explored two research questions: why do individuals decide to enter into elective co-parenting arrangements? And how do they manage their co-parenting arrangement and their relationship with their co-parent? Interview data from 10 elective co-parents (5 mothers and 5 fathers) were analyzed according to the principles of reflexive thematic analysis. Sociological theorisations of family practices, family display and family thinking were utilized to make sense of the data. The results centred around two organizing themes ('Reproducing the traditional family' and 'Modernising the traditional family'), and participants experienced a tension between these two ideas. Participants aimed to manage their co-parenting relationship with shared values and friendship, but defining their relationship was complex and gendered parenting patterns were ubiquitous. Findings add nuance to theorisations of family life and demonstrate that traditional parenthood ideologies remain pervasive, as parents aim to imagine and pursue parenthood on their own terms.</p>","PeriodicalId":46462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10860887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grappling with tradition: the experiences of cisgender, heterosexual mothers and fathers in elective co-parenting arrangements.\",\"authors\":\"Susie Bower-Brown, Sarah Foley, Vasanti Jadva, Susan Golombok\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13229400.2023.2209060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Elective co-parenting families, meaning two (or more parents) who are not in a romantic relationship having a child together, are becoming more common amongst cisgender, heterosexual parents. The study of elective co-parenting families offers researchers a unique opportunity to decouple co-parenting relationships from romantic relationships, but little research to date has explored their experiences. This study explored two research questions: why do individuals decide to enter into elective co-parenting arrangements? And how do they manage their co-parenting arrangement and their relationship with their co-parent? Interview data from 10 elective co-parents (5 mothers and 5 fathers) were analyzed according to the principles of reflexive thematic analysis. Sociological theorisations of family practices, family display and family thinking were utilized to make sense of the data. The results centred around two organizing themes ('Reproducing the traditional family' and 'Modernising the traditional family'), and participants experienced a tension between these two ideas. Participants aimed to manage their co-parenting relationship with shared values and friendship, but defining their relationship was complex and gendered parenting patterns were ubiquitous. Findings add nuance to theorisations of family life and demonstrate that traditional parenthood ideologies remain pervasive, as parents aim to imagine and pursue parenthood on their own terms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10860887/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2023.2209060\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2023.2209060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

选择性共同养育家庭是指两个(或更多)没有恋爱关系的父母共同养育一个孩子,这种情况在顺性异性父母中越来越常见。对选择性共同养育家庭的研究为研究人员提供了一个将共同养育关系与恋爱关系分离的独特机会,但迄今为止,很少有研究对他们的经历进行探讨。本研究探讨了两个研究问题:为什么个人会决定做出选择性的共同养育安排?他们如何处理共同养育安排以及与共同养育人之间的关系?本研究按照反思性主题分析的原则,对 10 位选择性共同养育父母(5 位母亲和 5 位父亲)的访谈数据进行了分析。我们运用了关于家庭实践、家庭展示和家庭思维的社会学理论来理解这些数据。研究结果围绕两个主题("传统家庭的再现 "和 "传统家庭的现代化")展开,参与者在这两个主题之间体验到了紧张感。参与者的目标是以共同的价值观和友谊来处理他们的共同养育关系,但界定他们的关系非常复杂,性别养育模式无处不在。研究结果为家庭生活理论增添了细微差别,并表明传统的为人父母的意识形态仍然普遍存在,因为父母们都希望按照自己的方式来想象和追求为人父母的生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Grappling with tradition: the experiences of cisgender, heterosexual mothers and fathers in elective co-parenting arrangements.

Elective co-parenting families, meaning two (or more parents) who are not in a romantic relationship having a child together, are becoming more common amongst cisgender, heterosexual parents. The study of elective co-parenting families offers researchers a unique opportunity to decouple co-parenting relationships from romantic relationships, but little research to date has explored their experiences. This study explored two research questions: why do individuals decide to enter into elective co-parenting arrangements? And how do they manage their co-parenting arrangement and their relationship with their co-parent? Interview data from 10 elective co-parents (5 mothers and 5 fathers) were analyzed according to the principles of reflexive thematic analysis. Sociological theorisations of family practices, family display and family thinking were utilized to make sense of the data. The results centred around two organizing themes ('Reproducing the traditional family' and 'Modernising the traditional family'), and participants experienced a tension between these two ideas. Participants aimed to manage their co-parenting relationship with shared values and friendship, but defining their relationship was complex and gendered parenting patterns were ubiquitous. Findings add nuance to theorisations of family life and demonstrate that traditional parenthood ideologies remain pervasive, as parents aim to imagine and pursue parenthood on their own terms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Family Studies
Journal of Family Studies FAMILY STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Family Studies is a peer reviewed international journal under the Editorship of Adjunct Professor Lawrie Moloney, School of Public Health, LaTrobe University; Australian Institute of Family Studies; and co-director of Children in Focus. The focus of the Journal of Family Studies is on the wellbeing of children in families in the process of change.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信