伊朗助产教育课程与ICM全球助产教育标准的比较评估

N. Bahri, M. Tabatabaeichehr, R. L. Roudsari
{"title":"伊朗助产教育课程与ICM全球助产教育标准的比较评估","authors":"N. Bahri, M. Tabatabaeichehr, R. L. Roudsari","doi":"10.22038/FMEJ.2018.33550.1212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the midwifery curriculum in Iran according to ICM Global Standards for Midwifery Education. Methods: In this comparative study the Iranian midwifery education curriculum in the part of ‘Competency in provision of care during pregnancy was compared against ICM Global Standards for Midwifery Education (2010) by three researchers using a checklist. In each item (35 items in knowledge domain and 26 item in the skill domain), the entire Iranian midwifery curriculum was searched for similar content, as well as the related courses by numbers. Also evaluation was done for ‘adequacy’ of each item by a 4 point Likert scale (Adequate, Relatively adequate, Relatively inadequate, Inadequate). Results: Quality assessment distribution of the Iranian midwifery curriculum in terms of Basic knowledge and Skill domain in context of ‘Competency in Provision of Care during Pregnancy’ shows that from 35 items in basic knowledge domain, 47.57 % were adequate, 15 % relatively adequate, 2.85 % relatively inadequate and 2% were inadequate. In Skill domain from 26 items, 53.85% were adequate and 46.15% were relatively inadequate. In two items there is no related content in this curriculum including” Signs of female genital cutting and its effects on reproductive health” and “Normal limits of results from community-relevant laboratory tests commonly performed in pregnancy”.  Conclusion: The curriculum of midwifery education in Iran covers ICM Global Standards for Midwifery Education (2010) in ‘Competency in Provision of Care during Pregnancy’ domain except for two items. Therefore, not covering these important issues is one of the most noteworthy weaknesses of this curriculum and should be considered in future reforms.","PeriodicalId":34243,"journal":{"name":"Future of Medical Education Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"25-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative assessment of Iranian midwifery education curriculum against ICM global standards for midwifery education\",\"authors\":\"N. Bahri, M. Tabatabaeichehr, R. L. Roudsari\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/FMEJ.2018.33550.1212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the midwifery curriculum in Iran according to ICM Global Standards for Midwifery Education. Methods: In this comparative study the Iranian midwifery education curriculum in the part of ‘Competency in provision of care during pregnancy was compared against ICM Global Standards for Midwifery Education (2010) by three researchers using a checklist. In each item (35 items in knowledge domain and 26 item in the skill domain), the entire Iranian midwifery curriculum was searched for similar content, as well as the related courses by numbers. Also evaluation was done for ‘adequacy’ of each item by a 4 point Likert scale (Adequate, Relatively adequate, Relatively inadequate, Inadequate). Results: Quality assessment distribution of the Iranian midwifery curriculum in terms of Basic knowledge and Skill domain in context of ‘Competency in Provision of Care during Pregnancy’ shows that from 35 items in basic knowledge domain, 47.57 % were adequate, 15 % relatively adequate, 2.85 % relatively inadequate and 2% were inadequate. In Skill domain from 26 items, 53.85% were adequate and 46.15% were relatively inadequate. In two items there is no related content in this curriculum including” Signs of female genital cutting and its effects on reproductive health” and “Normal limits of results from community-relevant laboratory tests commonly performed in pregnancy”.  Conclusion: The curriculum of midwifery education in Iran covers ICM Global Standards for Midwifery Education (2010) in ‘Competency in Provision of Care during Pregnancy’ domain except for two items. Therefore, not covering these important issues is one of the most noteworthy weaknesses of this curriculum and should be considered in future reforms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future of Medical Education Journal\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"25-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future of Medical Education Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/FMEJ.2018.33550.1212\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future of Medical Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/FMEJ.2018.33550.1212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是根据ICM全球助产教育标准评估伊朗助产课程的优势和劣势。方法:在这项比较研究中,三名研究人员使用检查表将“孕期护理能力”部分的伊朗助产教育课程与ICM全球助产教育标准(2010)进行了比较。在每个项目中(知识领域35个项目,技能领域26个项目),在整个伊朗助产课程中搜索相似的内容,以及按数字排列的相关课程。此外,还通过4分Likert量表(充足、相对充足、相对不足、不足)对每个项目的“充足性”进行了评估。结果:在“孕期护理能力”的背景下,伊朗助产课程在基础知识和技能领域的质量评估分布显示,在基础知识领域的35个项目中,47.57%是足够的,15%是相对足够的,2.85%是相对不足的,2%是不足的。在技能领域的26个项目中,53.85%是足够的,46.15%是相对不足的。在两个项目中,该课程中没有相关内容,包括“女性生殖器切割的迹象及其对生殖健康的影响”和“通常在怀孕期间进行的社区相关实验室测试结果的正常限制”。结论:伊朗的助产教育课程涵盖ICM全球助产教育标准(2010年)“孕期护理能力”领域,但有两项除外。因此,没有涵盖这些重要问题是该课程最值得注意的弱点之一,在未来的改革中应该加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative assessment of Iranian midwifery education curriculum against ICM global standards for midwifery education
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the midwifery curriculum in Iran according to ICM Global Standards for Midwifery Education. Methods: In this comparative study the Iranian midwifery education curriculum in the part of ‘Competency in provision of care during pregnancy was compared against ICM Global Standards for Midwifery Education (2010) by three researchers using a checklist. In each item (35 items in knowledge domain and 26 item in the skill domain), the entire Iranian midwifery curriculum was searched for similar content, as well as the related courses by numbers. Also evaluation was done for ‘adequacy’ of each item by a 4 point Likert scale (Adequate, Relatively adequate, Relatively inadequate, Inadequate). Results: Quality assessment distribution of the Iranian midwifery curriculum in terms of Basic knowledge and Skill domain in context of ‘Competency in Provision of Care during Pregnancy’ shows that from 35 items in basic knowledge domain, 47.57 % were adequate, 15 % relatively adequate, 2.85 % relatively inadequate and 2% were inadequate. In Skill domain from 26 items, 53.85% were adequate and 46.15% were relatively inadequate. In two items there is no related content in this curriculum including” Signs of female genital cutting and its effects on reproductive health” and “Normal limits of results from community-relevant laboratory tests commonly performed in pregnancy”.  Conclusion: The curriculum of midwifery education in Iran covers ICM Global Standards for Midwifery Education (2010) in ‘Competency in Provision of Care during Pregnancy’ domain except for two items. Therefore, not covering these important issues is one of the most noteworthy weaknesses of this curriculum and should be considered in future reforms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信