创新、经济增长和不平等:动态经济的面板动态阈值分析

IF 2 0 ECONOMICS
Sabreen Khan, Dil Pazir
{"title":"创新、经济增长和不平等:动态经济的面板动态阈值分析","authors":"Sabreen Khan, Dil Pazir","doi":"10.1142/s2010495223500045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study reinforces the minimal empirical work on the nonlinear relationship between innovative activities, economic growth, and income distribution. Meanwhile, this study assesses panel data of 40 developing economies from 1996 to 2020, wielding the newly developed threshold model by Seo and Shin (2016). Firstly, the empirical findings hold that there exists a nonlinear relationship between the variables. So, by regressing Innovation on economic growth, this study acquires a threshold value of 0.36% of R&D. Hence, indicating above the threshold value of 0.36, the economic growth will revamp. Secondly, regressing R&D on GINI, this study obtains a threshold value of 0.27% of R&D. So, above the threshold value of 0.25, the income inequality will topple down. In contrast, below the threshold level of Innovation will cause both economic growth and income inequality to exacerbate. All in all, the empirical findings of this study suggest that it is plausible to argue that governments and policymakers in developing economies should lavish more on Innovation because higher innovation activities result in inclusive growth.","PeriodicalId":43570,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Financial Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovation, Economic Growth, and Inequalities: A Panel Dynamic Threshold Analysis for Dynamic Economies\",\"authors\":\"Sabreen Khan, Dil Pazir\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s2010495223500045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study reinforces the minimal empirical work on the nonlinear relationship between innovative activities, economic growth, and income distribution. Meanwhile, this study assesses panel data of 40 developing economies from 1996 to 2020, wielding the newly developed threshold model by Seo and Shin (2016). Firstly, the empirical findings hold that there exists a nonlinear relationship between the variables. So, by regressing Innovation on economic growth, this study acquires a threshold value of 0.36% of R&D. Hence, indicating above the threshold value of 0.36, the economic growth will revamp. Secondly, regressing R&D on GINI, this study obtains a threshold value of 0.27% of R&D. So, above the threshold value of 0.25, the income inequality will topple down. In contrast, below the threshold level of Innovation will cause both economic growth and income inequality to exacerbate. All in all, the empirical findings of this study suggest that it is plausible to argue that governments and policymakers in developing economies should lavish more on Innovation because higher innovation activities result in inclusive growth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Financial Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Financial Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010495223500045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Financial Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010495223500045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究加强了对创新活动、经济增长和收入分配之间非线性关系的最小实证研究。同时,本研究采用Seo和Shin(2016)新开发的阈值模型,对1996年至2020年40个发展中经济体的面板数据进行了评估。首先,实证结果认为变量之间存在非线性关系。因此,通过对创新对经济增长的回归,本研究获得了研发对经济增长的0.36%的阈值。因此,在0.36的阈值以上,经济增长将得到改善。其次,将R&D对GINI进行回归,得到R&D的阈值为0.27%。因此,在0.25的阈值之上,收入不平等将会下降。反之,低于创新阈值水平将导致经济增长和收入不平等加剧。总而言之,本研究的实证结果表明,发展中经济体的政府和政策制定者应该加大对创新的投入,因为更高的创新活动会带来包容性增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Innovation, Economic Growth, and Inequalities: A Panel Dynamic Threshold Analysis for Dynamic Economies
This study reinforces the minimal empirical work on the nonlinear relationship between innovative activities, economic growth, and income distribution. Meanwhile, this study assesses panel data of 40 developing economies from 1996 to 2020, wielding the newly developed threshold model by Seo and Shin (2016). Firstly, the empirical findings hold that there exists a nonlinear relationship between the variables. So, by regressing Innovation on economic growth, this study acquires a threshold value of 0.36% of R&D. Hence, indicating above the threshold value of 0.36, the economic growth will revamp. Secondly, regressing R&D on GINI, this study obtains a threshold value of 0.27% of R&D. So, above the threshold value of 0.25, the income inequality will topple down. In contrast, below the threshold level of Innovation will cause both economic growth and income inequality to exacerbate. All in all, the empirical findings of this study suggest that it is plausible to argue that governments and policymakers in developing economies should lavish more on Innovation because higher innovation activities result in inclusive growth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
55.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信