标题苋属植物命名概述(苋科)7:wildenow出版

IF 1.8 3区生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES

Willdenowia Pub Date : 2020-03-31 DOI:10.3372/wi.50.50114

D. Iamonico

{"title":"标题苋属植物命名概述(苋科)7:wildenow出版","authors":"D. Iamonico","doi":"10.3372/wi.50.50114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A nomenclatural study of 12 names and designations published by C. L. Willdenow was carried out. Two designations, “Amaranthus incomptus” (nomen nudum) and “A. japonicus” (pro synonymo), are not validly published. The ten validly published names are not yet typified except for A. chlorostachys Willd. Eight of the nine untypified names (A. angustifolius M. Bieb. ex Willd., A. bicolor Nocca ex Willd., A. campestris Willd., A. inamoenus Willd., A. lateus Willd., A. polystachyus Willd., A. strictus Willd. and A. tenuifolius Willd.) are lectotypified here on specimens preserved in the Willdenow Herbarium in Berlin (B), while the other name (A. hecticus Willd.) is lectotypified here on an illustration in Willdenow's Historia Amaranthorum. All the names in Amaranthus published by Willdenow are considered here to be heterotypic synonyms of currently accepted species names. The results obtained highlight how many Amaranthus species, especially in the past, were described on the basis of characters that have low or no taxonomic value, whereas morphological characters of the flowers have a high taxonomic value.","PeriodicalId":48969,"journal":{"name":"Willdenowia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A nomenclatural survey of the genus Amaranthus (Amaranthaceae) 7: names published by Willdenow\",\"authors\":\"D. Iamonico\",\"doi\":\"10.3372/wi.50.50114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A nomenclatural study of 12 names and designations published by C. L. Willdenow was carried out. Two designations, “Amaranthus incomptus” (nomen nudum) and “A. japonicus” (pro synonymo), are not validly published. The ten validly published names are not yet typified except for A. chlorostachys Willd. Eight of the nine untypified names (A. angustifolius M. Bieb. ex Willd., A. bicolor Nocca ex Willd., A. campestris Willd., A. inamoenus Willd., A. lateus Willd., A. polystachyus Willd., A. strictus Willd. and A. tenuifolius Willd.) are lectotypified here on specimens preserved in the Willdenow Herbarium in Berlin (B), while the other name (A. hecticus Willd.) is lectotypified here on an illustration in Willdenow's Historia Amaranthorum. All the names in Amaranthus published by Willdenow are considered here to be heterotypic synonyms of currently accepted species names. The results obtained highlight how many Amaranthus species, especially in the past, were described on the basis of characters that have low or no taxonomic value, whereas morphological characters of the flowers have a high taxonomic value.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Willdenowia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Willdenowia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.50.50114\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Willdenowia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.50.50114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

摘要

本文对C. L. Willdenow发表的12种植物名称进行了命名学研究。两个名称，“Amaranthus incomptus”(nomen nudum)和“A。“Japonicus”(前同义词)，没有被有效发表。10个有效发表的名称尚未类型化，除了A. chlorostachys Willd。9个非典型名称中的8个(A. angustifolius M. Bieb;Willd交货。， A.双色野味。A. campestris wild。， A. inamoenus wild。A.拉蒂乌斯·威尔德。， A. polystachyus wild。， A. strictus wild。和A. tenuifolius wild .)在柏林威尔德诺植物标本馆保存的标本上(图B)显示为lectotyptype，而另一个名字(A. hecticus wild .)在威尔德诺的《Amaranthorum Historia》的插图上显示为lectotyptype。Willdenow发表的所有苋属植物的名称都被认为是目前公认的种名的异型同义词。结果表明，在过去的研究中，许多苋属植物都是根据低分类价值或没有分类价值的性状来描述的，而花的形态特征却具有很高的分类价值。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A nomenclatural survey of the genus Amaranthus (Amaranthaceae) 7: names published by Willdenow

A nomenclatural study of 12 names and designations published by C. L. Willdenow was carried out. Two designations, “Amaranthus incomptus” (nomen nudum) and “A. japonicus” (pro synonymo), are not validly published. The ten validly published names are not yet typified except for A. chlorostachys Willd. Eight of the nine untypified names (A. angustifolius M. Bieb. ex Willd., A. bicolor Nocca ex Willd., A. campestris Willd., A. inamoenus Willd., A. lateus Willd., A. polystachyus Willd., A. strictus Willd. and A. tenuifolius Willd.) are lectotypified here on specimens preserved in the Willdenow Herbarium in Berlin (B), while the other name (A. hecticus Willd.) is lectotypified here on an illustration in Willdenow's Historia Amaranthorum. All the names in Amaranthus published by Willdenow are considered here to be heterotypic synonyms of currently accepted species names. The results obtained highlight how many Amaranthus species, especially in the past, were described on the basis of characters that have low or no taxonomic value, whereas morphological characters of the flowers have a high taxonomic value.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Willdenowia PLANT SCIENCES-

CiteScore

4.60

自引率

5.30%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Willdenowia is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing original research articles in English from the entire fields of plant, algal and fungal systematics, covering the evolution, taxonomy and nomenclature of these organisms as well as related fields such as floristics and plant geography. Articles on phylogeny and molecular systematics are especially welcome, as are review articles. Descriptions of new taxa may be considered, but only if supported by robust evidence. Narrowly regional studies of widespread taxa, routine typifications, checklists and new floristic records are generally not considered (excluding contributions to the Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae). Authors are encouraged to deposit duplicates of their material, especially nomenclatural types, in the Berlin herbarium (B).