印度尼西亚的糖尿病患者:三级医院的管理与初级保健的比较

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
H. Permana, R. C. Koesoemadinata, N. Soetedjo, N. F. Dewi, Novi Jayanti, S. Imaculata, R. Ruslami, B. Alisjahbana, S. McAllister
{"title":"印度尼西亚的糖尿病患者:三级医院的管理与初级保健的比较","authors":"H. Permana, R. C. Koesoemadinata, N. Soetedjo, N. F. Dewi, Novi Jayanti, S. Imaculata, R. Ruslami, B. Alisjahbana, S. McAllister","doi":"10.18051/univmed.2022.v41.157-168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) requires that patients have greater access to care, which is yet lacking in many low- and middle-income countries and the quality of which varies between health care facilities. We compare the characteristics, complications, and risk profile of diabetes in patients receiving care in primary and tertiary level health facilities in Bandung, Indonesia.\nMethodsAdult DM patients were recruited from 25 community health centres (CHCs) and the outpatient clinic at one referral hospital. Key data collected and compared to national guidelines were DM history, treatment, complications, blood pressure, height, weight, and laboratory examinations on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), lipid profile, and creatinine. Data analysis was by chi-square test.\nResultsOf the 809 DM patients (median age 59 years, 63% female, 98% type 2 DM), 318 (39%) were from CHCs and 491 (61%) from the hospital. Overall median HbA1c was 8.3%, with no difference between CHC and hospital patients. Only 32% of patients with HbA1c ≥10% were on insulin (CHCs 5.9%, hospital 42.9%), and only 18% of those on insulin had glycaemic control. Hypertension was common (CHCs 62%, hospital 51%, p<0.001), and only 44% of CHC and 34% of hospital patients received antihypertensive therapy. Among those with macrovascular complications, only 32% (CHCs) and 26% (hospital) were receiving aspirin. The numbers reaching the treatment targets were low for those on antihypertensives and lipid-lowering medications (80/251 and 11/105, respectively).\nConclusionGlycaemic control and management of complications of DM patients at both health care levels need considerable improvement.","PeriodicalId":42578,"journal":{"name":"Universa Medicina","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diabetes mellitus patients in Indonesia: management in a tertiary hospital compared to primary health care\",\"authors\":\"H. Permana, R. C. Koesoemadinata, N. Soetedjo, N. F. Dewi, Novi Jayanti, S. Imaculata, R. Ruslami, B. Alisjahbana, S. McAllister\",\"doi\":\"10.18051/univmed.2022.v41.157-168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background The increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) requires that patients have greater access to care, which is yet lacking in many low- and middle-income countries and the quality of which varies between health care facilities. We compare the characteristics, complications, and risk profile of diabetes in patients receiving care in primary and tertiary level health facilities in Bandung, Indonesia.\\nMethodsAdult DM patients were recruited from 25 community health centres (CHCs) and the outpatient clinic at one referral hospital. Key data collected and compared to national guidelines were DM history, treatment, complications, blood pressure, height, weight, and laboratory examinations on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), lipid profile, and creatinine. Data analysis was by chi-square test.\\nResultsOf the 809 DM patients (median age 59 years, 63% female, 98% type 2 DM), 318 (39%) were from CHCs and 491 (61%) from the hospital. Overall median HbA1c was 8.3%, with no difference between CHC and hospital patients. Only 32% of patients with HbA1c ≥10% were on insulin (CHCs 5.9%, hospital 42.9%), and only 18% of those on insulin had glycaemic control. Hypertension was common (CHCs 62%, hospital 51%, p<0.001), and only 44% of CHC and 34% of hospital patients received antihypertensive therapy. Among those with macrovascular complications, only 32% (CHCs) and 26% (hospital) were receiving aspirin. The numbers reaching the treatment targets were low for those on antihypertensives and lipid-lowering medications (80/251 and 11/105, respectively).\\nConclusionGlycaemic control and management of complications of DM patients at both health care levels need considerable improvement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Universa Medicina\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Universa Medicina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18051/univmed.2022.v41.157-168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universa Medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18051/univmed.2022.v41.157-168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景糖尿病(DM)患病率的增加要求患者有更多的机会获得护理,而在许多中低收入国家却缺乏这种服务,而且不同医疗机构的服务质量也不同。我们比较了在印度尼西亚万隆的初级和三级卫生机构接受治疗的患者的糖尿病特征、并发症和风险状况。方法从25个社区卫生中心(CHCs)和一家转诊医院的门诊招募成年DM患者。收集并与国家指南进行比较的关键数据包括糖尿病病史、治疗、并发症、血压、身高、体重以及糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、血脂和肌酐的实验室检查。数据分析采用卡方检验。结果809例DM患者(中位年龄59岁,63%为女性,98%为2型DM)中,318例(39%)来自CHCs,491例(61%)来自医院。总的HbA1c中位数为8.3%,CHC和住院患者之间没有差异。HbA1c≥10%的患者中,只有32%服用了胰岛素(CHCs 5.9%,医院42.9%),而服用胰岛素的患者中只有18%的血糖得到了控制。高血压很常见(CHCs 62%,医院51%,p<0.001),只有44%的CHC和34%的医院患者接受了降压治疗。在那些有大血管并发症的患者中,只有32%(CHCs)和26%(医院)接受了阿司匹林治疗。服用降压药和降脂药的患者达到治疗目标的人数较低(分别为80/251和11/105)。结论糖尿病患者的血糖控制和并发症的处理在两个医疗水平上都需要相当大的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diabetes mellitus patients in Indonesia: management in a tertiary hospital compared to primary health care
Background The increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) requires that patients have greater access to care, which is yet lacking in many low- and middle-income countries and the quality of which varies between health care facilities. We compare the characteristics, complications, and risk profile of diabetes in patients receiving care in primary and tertiary level health facilities in Bandung, Indonesia. MethodsAdult DM patients were recruited from 25 community health centres (CHCs) and the outpatient clinic at one referral hospital. Key data collected and compared to national guidelines were DM history, treatment, complications, blood pressure, height, weight, and laboratory examinations on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), lipid profile, and creatinine. Data analysis was by chi-square test. ResultsOf the 809 DM patients (median age 59 years, 63% female, 98% type 2 DM), 318 (39%) were from CHCs and 491 (61%) from the hospital. Overall median HbA1c was 8.3%, with no difference between CHC and hospital patients. Only 32% of patients with HbA1c ≥10% were on insulin (CHCs 5.9%, hospital 42.9%), and only 18% of those on insulin had glycaemic control. Hypertension was common (CHCs 62%, hospital 51%, p<0.001), and only 44% of CHC and 34% of hospital patients received antihypertensive therapy. Among those with macrovascular complications, only 32% (CHCs) and 26% (hospital) were receiving aspirin. The numbers reaching the treatment targets were low for those on antihypertensives and lipid-lowering medications (80/251 and 11/105, respectively). ConclusionGlycaemic control and management of complications of DM patients at both health care levels need considerable improvement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Universa Medicina
Universa Medicina MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信