{"title":"烧伤患者的情绪困扰及其预测因素","authors":"H. Sadeghi-Bazargani, Z. Zare, F. Ranjbar","doi":"10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Background: Burn injuries are most certainly stressful events, particularly when permanent disfigurement is a result. Survivors of burn events are even more susceptible to psychological disorders compared to other groups. Purposes Present study was conducted to assess predictors of emotional distress and possible psychiatric morbidity in burn patients. Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out on a total of 255 burn patients. In order to assess emotional distress and irrational beliefs, General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) and Scale for Irrational Thoughts after Burning (SITB) was used. To identify predictors of emotional distress, both bivariate and multivariate analysis method were conducted. In multivariate linear regression, forward strategy was used for building the model. Preliminary variable selection for model design was based on a P<0.2 and final decision for keeping the variables in the model was based on a P< 0.05. Results: The results of bivariate analysis showed that gender, occupation, history of referral to psychiatrist, history of consumption depression drugs, percentage of Total Body Surface Area (TBSA) burned history of special disease; and also irrational beliefs and geographical areas had significant relationships with emotional distress. (P< 0.05) Using forward linear regression, gender, irrational beliefs, history of referral to psychiatrist, geographical areas, etiology of burning, environment, duration of burn, history of special disease, body location burned (face only, head and neck, private exposed) and intent of injury were significant predictors of the emotional distress. The models predicted 29 percent (p< 0.001) of emotional distress. Conclusions: Considering to possible psychiatric morbidity and development of facilities for screening is necessary. Moreover, consultation with mental health experts after burn injuries is highly recommended. Keywords: Burn, Injuries, GHQ28, Psychological disorders, Disfigurement","PeriodicalId":32422,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Injury and Violence Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emotional distress and its predictors in burn patients\",\"authors\":\"H. Sadeghi-Bazargani, Z. Zare, F. Ranjbar\",\"doi\":\"10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Background: Burn injuries are most certainly stressful events, particularly when permanent disfigurement is a result. Survivors of burn events are even more susceptible to psychological disorders compared to other groups. Purposes Present study was conducted to assess predictors of emotional distress and possible psychiatric morbidity in burn patients. Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out on a total of 255 burn patients. In order to assess emotional distress and irrational beliefs, General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) and Scale for Irrational Thoughts after Burning (SITB) was used. To identify predictors of emotional distress, both bivariate and multivariate analysis method were conducted. In multivariate linear regression, forward strategy was used for building the model. Preliminary variable selection for model design was based on a P<0.2 and final decision for keeping the variables in the model was based on a P< 0.05. Results: The results of bivariate analysis showed that gender, occupation, history of referral to psychiatrist, history of consumption depression drugs, percentage of Total Body Surface Area (TBSA) burned history of special disease; and also irrational beliefs and geographical areas had significant relationships with emotional distress. (P< 0.05) Using forward linear regression, gender, irrational beliefs, history of referral to psychiatrist, geographical areas, etiology of burning, environment, duration of burn, history of special disease, body location burned (face only, head and neck, private exposed) and intent of injury were significant predictors of the emotional distress. The models predicted 29 percent (p< 0.001) of emotional distress. Conclusions: Considering to possible psychiatric morbidity and development of facilities for screening is necessary. Moreover, consultation with mental health experts after burn injuries is highly recommended. Keywords: Burn, Injuries, GHQ28, Psychological disorders, Disfigurement\",\"PeriodicalId\":32422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Injury and Violence Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Injury and Violence Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Injury and Violence Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Emotional distress and its predictors in burn patients
Abstract: Background: Burn injuries are most certainly stressful events, particularly when permanent disfigurement is a result. Survivors of burn events are even more susceptible to psychological disorders compared to other groups. Purposes Present study was conducted to assess predictors of emotional distress and possible psychiatric morbidity in burn patients. Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out on a total of 255 burn patients. In order to assess emotional distress and irrational beliefs, General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) and Scale for Irrational Thoughts after Burning (SITB) was used. To identify predictors of emotional distress, both bivariate and multivariate analysis method were conducted. In multivariate linear regression, forward strategy was used for building the model. Preliminary variable selection for model design was based on a P<0.2 and final decision for keeping the variables in the model was based on a P< 0.05. Results: The results of bivariate analysis showed that gender, occupation, history of referral to psychiatrist, history of consumption depression drugs, percentage of Total Body Surface Area (TBSA) burned history of special disease; and also irrational beliefs and geographical areas had significant relationships with emotional distress. (P< 0.05) Using forward linear regression, gender, irrational beliefs, history of referral to psychiatrist, geographical areas, etiology of burning, environment, duration of burn, history of special disease, body location burned (face only, head and neck, private exposed) and intent of injury were significant predictors of the emotional distress. The models predicted 29 percent (p< 0.001) of emotional distress. Conclusions: Considering to possible psychiatric morbidity and development of facilities for screening is necessary. Moreover, consultation with mental health experts after burn injuries is highly recommended. Keywords: Burn, Injuries, GHQ28, Psychological disorders, Disfigurement
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Injury and Violence Research (JIVR) is a peer-reviewed open-access medical journal covering all aspects of traumatology includes quantitative and qualitative studies in the field of clinical and basic sciences about trauma, burns, drowning, falls, occupational/road/ sport safety, youth violence, child/elder abuse, child/elder injuries, intimate partner abuse/sexual violence, self-harm, suicide, patient safety, safe communities, consumer safety, disaster management, terrorism, surveillance/burden of injury and all other intentional and unintentional injuries.