引言:情感亲密

IF 0.9 Q3 WOMENS STUDIES
Marjo Kolehmainen, Kinneret Lahad, Annukka Lahti
{"title":"引言:情感亲密","authors":"Marjo Kolehmainen, Kinneret Lahad, Annukka Lahti","doi":"10.1080/08038740.2021.1948724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Special Issue offers a novel platform to rethink intimacies through the lens of affect theories. In particular, it introduces new ways of understanding affective intimacies, encompassing explorations that tap into the questions of what affect theories and methodologies can provide in terms of their theoretical and methodological potential to renew feminist debates concerning intimacy. The authors of the six ground-breaking articles of this Special Issue offer alternative ways of researching and understanding these topics by not only grasping affective intimacies as a locus of their inquiry, but also by developing analytical tools to reassess the entanglements of affect and intimacy—in particular by considering affective intimacies through their multiple matterings and by carefully locating their studies in different disciplinary and interdisciplinary settings. As a whole, this Special Issue on Affective Intimacies maps the potential of affect theories in renewing feminist debates concerning intimacy. Such meaningful questions as those introduced above originally lay at the core of the Academy of Finland-funded research project ‘Just the Two of Us? Affective Inequalities in Intimate Relationships’. The final event of the project was an international workshop entitled “Affective Intimacies: A Workshop with Sasha Roseneil and Kinneret Lahad” which was held at Tampere University on 18– 19 November 2019. It consisted of two public keynotes by Professor Sasha Roseneil (University College London, UK) and Dr Kinneret Lahad (Tel Aviv University, Israel) followed by commentaries from the project’s principal investigator Tuula Juvonen (Tampere University, Finland) and Professor Susanna Paasonen (University of Turku, Finland), principal investigator of the research consortium Intimacy in Data-Driven Culture. The event also entailed a two-day workshop where participants’ workin-progress papers were commented on by the keynote speakers, organizers and fellow participants. This Special Issue also has its origins in the abovementioned event, as Marjo Kolehmainen and Annukka Lahti were members of the organizing team, and Kinneret Lahad was a keynote speaker. During the preparations, we three decided to edit a Special Issue dedicated to the challenge of recognizing and utilizing the potential to imagine intimacy and affect in alternative ways, without starting from the already familiar terrains, theories and conceptualizations. Bearing this challenge in mind, we sought submissions that address the embodied, affective and psychic aspects of intimate entanglements. We invited submissions that may include but were not limited to the following themes: affect, intimacy and power; collective becomings; emerging intimacies and queering affects. The call proved highly popular with 57 abstracts submitted in total. Unfortunately, we were only able to accept a small portion of the most promising abstracts for further processing, and even had to exclude several of high quality and with fascinating themes. Yet, we are very pleased to introduce the six excellent articles that made their way into this Special Issue. The different papers accepted the invitation to reconsider or depart from the assumptions that there are a priori affective domains, such as care or sexual relationships, or alternatively that intimacy is only about what is private and special (Kolehmainen & Juvonen, 2018; Latimer & López Gómez, 2019). Thus, rather than assuming that we could parse affect and intimacy together in a predefined way, this Special Issue asks how the study of affect would enable us to rethink intimacies—what affect theories can do to the prevailing notions of intimacy, and how they might renew and enrich theories of intimacy. While pioneering in scholarship on both intimacy and affect, feminist scholars have recognized intimacy as an important issue and advanced the field of affect studies. Yet there is often an association of intimacy with “positive” closeness, even if this is highly problematic from a feminist point of view as NORA—NORDIC JOURNAL OF FEMINIST AND GENDER RESEARCH 2021, VOL. 29, NO. 3, 147–151 https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2021.1948724","PeriodicalId":45485,"journal":{"name":"NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08038740.2021.1948724","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: Affective Intimacies\",\"authors\":\"Marjo Kolehmainen, Kinneret Lahad, Annukka Lahti\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08038740.2021.1948724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This Special Issue offers a novel platform to rethink intimacies through the lens of affect theories. In particular, it introduces new ways of understanding affective intimacies, encompassing explorations that tap into the questions of what affect theories and methodologies can provide in terms of their theoretical and methodological potential to renew feminist debates concerning intimacy. The authors of the six ground-breaking articles of this Special Issue offer alternative ways of researching and understanding these topics by not only grasping affective intimacies as a locus of their inquiry, but also by developing analytical tools to reassess the entanglements of affect and intimacy—in particular by considering affective intimacies through their multiple matterings and by carefully locating their studies in different disciplinary and interdisciplinary settings. As a whole, this Special Issue on Affective Intimacies maps the potential of affect theories in renewing feminist debates concerning intimacy. Such meaningful questions as those introduced above originally lay at the core of the Academy of Finland-funded research project ‘Just the Two of Us? Affective Inequalities in Intimate Relationships’. The final event of the project was an international workshop entitled “Affective Intimacies: A Workshop with Sasha Roseneil and Kinneret Lahad” which was held at Tampere University on 18– 19 November 2019. It consisted of two public keynotes by Professor Sasha Roseneil (University College London, UK) and Dr Kinneret Lahad (Tel Aviv University, Israel) followed by commentaries from the project’s principal investigator Tuula Juvonen (Tampere University, Finland) and Professor Susanna Paasonen (University of Turku, Finland), principal investigator of the research consortium Intimacy in Data-Driven Culture. The event also entailed a two-day workshop where participants’ workin-progress papers were commented on by the keynote speakers, organizers and fellow participants. This Special Issue also has its origins in the abovementioned event, as Marjo Kolehmainen and Annukka Lahti were members of the organizing team, and Kinneret Lahad was a keynote speaker. During the preparations, we three decided to edit a Special Issue dedicated to the challenge of recognizing and utilizing the potential to imagine intimacy and affect in alternative ways, without starting from the already familiar terrains, theories and conceptualizations. Bearing this challenge in mind, we sought submissions that address the embodied, affective and psychic aspects of intimate entanglements. We invited submissions that may include but were not limited to the following themes: affect, intimacy and power; collective becomings; emerging intimacies and queering affects. The call proved highly popular with 57 abstracts submitted in total. Unfortunately, we were only able to accept a small portion of the most promising abstracts for further processing, and even had to exclude several of high quality and with fascinating themes. Yet, we are very pleased to introduce the six excellent articles that made their way into this Special Issue. The different papers accepted the invitation to reconsider or depart from the assumptions that there are a priori affective domains, such as care or sexual relationships, or alternatively that intimacy is only about what is private and special (Kolehmainen & Juvonen, 2018; Latimer & López Gómez, 2019). Thus, rather than assuming that we could parse affect and intimacy together in a predefined way, this Special Issue asks how the study of affect would enable us to rethink intimacies—what affect theories can do to the prevailing notions of intimacy, and how they might renew and enrich theories of intimacy. While pioneering in scholarship on both intimacy and affect, feminist scholars have recognized intimacy as an important issue and advanced the field of affect studies. Yet there is often an association of intimacy with “positive” closeness, even if this is highly problematic from a feminist point of view as NORA—NORDIC JOURNAL OF FEMINIST AND GENDER RESEARCH 2021, VOL. 29, NO. 3, 147–151 https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2021.1948724\",\"PeriodicalId\":45485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08038740.2021.1948724\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2021.1948724\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2021.1948724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

这期特刊提供了一个新颖的平台,通过情感理论的视角来重新思考亲密关系。特别是,它引入了理解情感亲密关系的新方法,包括探索情感理论和方法论在理论和方法上的潜力,以重新引发关于亲密关系的女权主义辩论。本期特刊的六篇突破性文章的作者提供了研究和理解这些主题的替代方法,他们不仅将情感亲密作为他们的研究中心,但也可以通过开发分析工具来重新评估情感和亲密关系的纠缠——特别是通过考虑情感亲密关系的多重问题,并将他们的研究仔细定位在不同的学科和跨学科环境中。总的来说,这期《情感亲密关系特刊》描绘了情感理论在更新女权主义关于亲密关系的辩论中的潜力。像上面介绍的这些有意义的问题最初是芬兰科学院资助的研究项目“只有我们两个?”的核心?亲密关系中的情感不平等。该项目的最后一场活动是2019年11月18日至19日在坦佩雷大学举行的题为“情感亲密:与萨莎·罗森尼尔和金纳雷特·拉哈德的研讨会”的国际研讨会。它由Sasha Roseneil教授(英国伦敦大学学院)和Kinneret Lahad博士(以色列特拉维夫大学)的两篇公开主题演讲组成,随后是该项目首席研究员Tuula Juvonen(芬兰坦佩雷大学)和Susanna Paasonen教授(芬兰图尔库大学)的评论,数据驱动文化中的亲密关系研究联盟的首席研究员。该活动还包括一个为期两天的研讨会,主讲人、组织者和其他与会者对与会者正在进行的工作文件发表了评论。本期特刊也起源于上述活动,Marjo Kolehmainen和Annukka Lahti是组织团队的成员,Kinneret Lahad是主旨发言人。在筹备过程中,我们三人决定编辑一期特刊,专门讨论如何认识和利用以其他方式想象亲密关系和情感的潜力,而不是从已经熟悉的地形、理论和概念开始。考虑到这一挑战,我们寻求解决亲密纠缠的具体、情感和心理方面的意见书。我们邀请提交的材料可能包括但不限于以下主题:情感、亲密和权力;集体成就;新出现的内膜和queering影响。事实证明,该呼吁非常受欢迎,共提交了57篇摘要。不幸的是,我们只能接受一小部分最有希望的摘要进行进一步处理,甚至不得不排除一些高质量、主题引人入胜的摘要。然而,我们非常高兴地向大家介绍进入本期特刊的六篇优秀文章。不同的论文接受了重新考虑或偏离存在先验情感领域的假设,如护理或性关系,或者亲密关系只是关于什么是私人的和特殊的(Kolehmainen和Juvonen,2018;Latimer和López Gómez,2019)。因此,本期特刊不是假设我们可以以预先定义的方式一起分析情感和亲密关系,而是询问情感研究如何使我们能够重新思考亲密关系——情感理论可以对流行的亲密关系概念做些什么,以及它们如何更新和丰富亲密关系理论。女权主义学者在研究亲密关系和情感方面开创了先河,同时也认识到亲密关系是一个重要问题,并推动了情感研究领域的发展。然而,亲密关系往往与“积极”的亲密关系联系在一起,即使从女权主义的角度来看,这是一个很大的问题https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2021.1948724
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction: Affective Intimacies
This Special Issue offers a novel platform to rethink intimacies through the lens of affect theories. In particular, it introduces new ways of understanding affective intimacies, encompassing explorations that tap into the questions of what affect theories and methodologies can provide in terms of their theoretical and methodological potential to renew feminist debates concerning intimacy. The authors of the six ground-breaking articles of this Special Issue offer alternative ways of researching and understanding these topics by not only grasping affective intimacies as a locus of their inquiry, but also by developing analytical tools to reassess the entanglements of affect and intimacy—in particular by considering affective intimacies through their multiple matterings and by carefully locating their studies in different disciplinary and interdisciplinary settings. As a whole, this Special Issue on Affective Intimacies maps the potential of affect theories in renewing feminist debates concerning intimacy. Such meaningful questions as those introduced above originally lay at the core of the Academy of Finland-funded research project ‘Just the Two of Us? Affective Inequalities in Intimate Relationships’. The final event of the project was an international workshop entitled “Affective Intimacies: A Workshop with Sasha Roseneil and Kinneret Lahad” which was held at Tampere University on 18– 19 November 2019. It consisted of two public keynotes by Professor Sasha Roseneil (University College London, UK) and Dr Kinneret Lahad (Tel Aviv University, Israel) followed by commentaries from the project’s principal investigator Tuula Juvonen (Tampere University, Finland) and Professor Susanna Paasonen (University of Turku, Finland), principal investigator of the research consortium Intimacy in Data-Driven Culture. The event also entailed a two-day workshop where participants’ workin-progress papers were commented on by the keynote speakers, organizers and fellow participants. This Special Issue also has its origins in the abovementioned event, as Marjo Kolehmainen and Annukka Lahti were members of the organizing team, and Kinneret Lahad was a keynote speaker. During the preparations, we three decided to edit a Special Issue dedicated to the challenge of recognizing and utilizing the potential to imagine intimacy and affect in alternative ways, without starting from the already familiar terrains, theories and conceptualizations. Bearing this challenge in mind, we sought submissions that address the embodied, affective and psychic aspects of intimate entanglements. We invited submissions that may include but were not limited to the following themes: affect, intimacy and power; collective becomings; emerging intimacies and queering affects. The call proved highly popular with 57 abstracts submitted in total. Unfortunately, we were only able to accept a small portion of the most promising abstracts for further processing, and even had to exclude several of high quality and with fascinating themes. Yet, we are very pleased to introduce the six excellent articles that made their way into this Special Issue. The different papers accepted the invitation to reconsider or depart from the assumptions that there are a priori affective domains, such as care or sexual relationships, or alternatively that intimacy is only about what is private and special (Kolehmainen & Juvonen, 2018; Latimer & López Gómez, 2019). Thus, rather than assuming that we could parse affect and intimacy together in a predefined way, this Special Issue asks how the study of affect would enable us to rethink intimacies—what affect theories can do to the prevailing notions of intimacy, and how they might renew and enrich theories of intimacy. While pioneering in scholarship on both intimacy and affect, feminist scholars have recognized intimacy as an important issue and advanced the field of affect studies. Yet there is often an association of intimacy with “positive” closeness, even if this is highly problematic from a feminist point of view as NORA—NORDIC JOURNAL OF FEMINIST AND GENDER RESEARCH 2021, VOL. 29, NO. 3, 147–151 https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2021.1948724
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信