系列:糖尿病药物的心血管结局试验。

IF 0.4 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
M. Fisher
{"title":"系列:糖尿病药物的心血管结局试验。","authors":"M. Fisher","doi":"10.15277/bjd.2022.387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"LEADER was a landmark cardiovascular outcome trial with the GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide, which demonstrated significant reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and non-fatal stroke), driven by a reduction in cardiovascular deaths and accompanied by a significant reduction in all-cause mortality. Shortly afterwards, the SUSTAIN-6 trial with once-weekly semaglutide demonstrated non-inferiority for MACE, with a nominal reduction in MACE that was driven by a reduction in the risk of non-fatal strokes. Since then, a further six cardiovascular trials have been published with GLP-1 receptor agonists, with major differences in study design and outcomes.\nFour trials have been performed with once-weekly formulations. The EXSCEL trial with once-weekly exenatide showed non-inferiority for MACE, but not superiority, with a reduction in all-cause mortality which was an exploratory outcome. The Harmony Outcomes trial with albiglutide demonstrated significant reductions in MACE, driven by reductions in fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction. REWIND, with dulaglutide, also demonstrated significant reductions in MACE, this time driven by reductions in strokes. The AMPLITUDE-O trial with efpeglenatide showed significant reductions in MACE, but none of the individual components of MACE was significantly reduced as a secondary endpoint, and in contrast to other trials there was also a significant reduction in heart failure events. The fifth trial was the PIONEER 6 trial with the oral formulation of semaglutide, and this showed non-inferiority for MACE, but not superiority, with reductions in cardiovascular deaths and all-cause mortality which were secondary outcomes. Finally, FREEDOM-CVO with a subcutaneous mini-pump of exenatide showed non-inferiority for MACE and MACE plus hospitalisation for unstable angina. A reduction in albuminuria was seen in several of these trials, but there was no definite effect on eGFR or end-stage renal disease.\nMeta-analysis of the cardiovascular outcome trials with GLP-1 receptor agonists has demonstrated significant reductions in MACE, cardiovascular death, fatal or non-fatal stroke, fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality. It remains unclear why updated guidance from NICE on the management of T2DM in adults fails to acknowledge these evidence-based cardiovascular benefits.","PeriodicalId":42951,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Diabetes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Series: Cardiovascular outcome trials for diabetes drugs.\",\"authors\":\"M. Fisher\",\"doi\":\"10.15277/bjd.2022.387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"LEADER was a landmark cardiovascular outcome trial with the GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide, which demonstrated significant reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and non-fatal stroke), driven by a reduction in cardiovascular deaths and accompanied by a significant reduction in all-cause mortality. Shortly afterwards, the SUSTAIN-6 trial with once-weekly semaglutide demonstrated non-inferiority for MACE, with a nominal reduction in MACE that was driven by a reduction in the risk of non-fatal strokes. Since then, a further six cardiovascular trials have been published with GLP-1 receptor agonists, with major differences in study design and outcomes.\\nFour trials have been performed with once-weekly formulations. The EXSCEL trial with once-weekly exenatide showed non-inferiority for MACE, but not superiority, with a reduction in all-cause mortality which was an exploratory outcome. The Harmony Outcomes trial with albiglutide demonstrated significant reductions in MACE, driven by reductions in fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction. REWIND, with dulaglutide, also demonstrated significant reductions in MACE, this time driven by reductions in strokes. The AMPLITUDE-O trial with efpeglenatide showed significant reductions in MACE, but none of the individual components of MACE was significantly reduced as a secondary endpoint, and in contrast to other trials there was also a significant reduction in heart failure events. The fifth trial was the PIONEER 6 trial with the oral formulation of semaglutide, and this showed non-inferiority for MACE, but not superiority, with reductions in cardiovascular deaths and all-cause mortality which were secondary outcomes. Finally, FREEDOM-CVO with a subcutaneous mini-pump of exenatide showed non-inferiority for MACE and MACE plus hospitalisation for unstable angina. A reduction in albuminuria was seen in several of these trials, but there was no definite effect on eGFR or end-stage renal disease.\\nMeta-analysis of the cardiovascular outcome trials with GLP-1 receptor agonists has demonstrated significant reductions in MACE, cardiovascular death, fatal or non-fatal stroke, fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality. It remains unclear why updated guidance from NICE on the management of T2DM in adults fails to acknowledge these evidence-based cardiovascular benefits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Diabetes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2022.387\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2022.387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

LEADER是一项具有里程碑意义的心血管结局试验,使用GLP-1受体激动剂利拉鲁肽,该试验显示主要不良心血管事件(MACE,心血管死亡、非致死性心肌梗死和非致死性卒中的组合)的显著降低,主要原因是心血管死亡的减少,并伴随着全因死亡率的显著降低。不久之后,每周服用一次西马鲁肽的SUSTAIN-6试验显示MACE的非劣效性,MACE的象征性降低是由于非致命性卒中风险的降低。此后,又发表了6项使用GLP-1受体激动剂的心血管试验,在研究设计和结果上存在重大差异。已经进行了四次试验,每周一次配方。每周一次使用艾塞那肽的EXSCEL试验显示MACE非劣效性,但不是优势性,全因死亡率降低,这是一个探索性结果。阿比鲁肽的Harmony Outcomes试验显示,由于致死性或非致死性心肌梗死的减少,MACE显著降低。使用杜拉鲁肽的REWIND也显示出MACE的显著降低,这一次是由于中风的减少。使用efpeglenatide的amplude - o试验显示MACE显著降低,但作为次要终点,MACE的单个成分均未显著降低,与其他试验相比,心力衰竭事件也显著减少。第五项试验是口服西马鲁肽制剂的PIONEER 6试验,该试验显示MACE的非劣效性,但不是优势,心血管死亡和全因死亡率(次要结局)降低。最后,FREEDOM-CVO与皮下迷你泵艾塞那肽显示MACE和MACE合并住院治疗不稳定心绞痛的非劣效性。在一些试验中发现蛋白尿减少,但对eGFR或终末期肾病没有明确的影响。GLP-1受体激动剂心血管结局试验的荟萃分析显示,MACE、心血管死亡、致死性或非致死性卒中、致死性或非致死性心肌梗死和全因死亡率显著降低。目前尚不清楚为什么NICE关于成人T2DM管理的最新指南没有承认这些基于证据的心血管益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Series: Cardiovascular outcome trials for diabetes drugs.
LEADER was a landmark cardiovascular outcome trial with the GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide, which demonstrated significant reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and non-fatal stroke), driven by a reduction in cardiovascular deaths and accompanied by a significant reduction in all-cause mortality. Shortly afterwards, the SUSTAIN-6 trial with once-weekly semaglutide demonstrated non-inferiority for MACE, with a nominal reduction in MACE that was driven by a reduction in the risk of non-fatal strokes. Since then, a further six cardiovascular trials have been published with GLP-1 receptor agonists, with major differences in study design and outcomes. Four trials have been performed with once-weekly formulations. The EXSCEL trial with once-weekly exenatide showed non-inferiority for MACE, but not superiority, with a reduction in all-cause mortality which was an exploratory outcome. The Harmony Outcomes trial with albiglutide demonstrated significant reductions in MACE, driven by reductions in fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction. REWIND, with dulaglutide, also demonstrated significant reductions in MACE, this time driven by reductions in strokes. The AMPLITUDE-O trial with efpeglenatide showed significant reductions in MACE, but none of the individual components of MACE was significantly reduced as a secondary endpoint, and in contrast to other trials there was also a significant reduction in heart failure events. The fifth trial was the PIONEER 6 trial with the oral formulation of semaglutide, and this showed non-inferiority for MACE, but not superiority, with reductions in cardiovascular deaths and all-cause mortality which were secondary outcomes. Finally, FREEDOM-CVO with a subcutaneous mini-pump of exenatide showed non-inferiority for MACE and MACE plus hospitalisation for unstable angina. A reduction in albuminuria was seen in several of these trials, but there was no definite effect on eGFR or end-stage renal disease. Meta-analysis of the cardiovascular outcome trials with GLP-1 receptor agonists has demonstrated significant reductions in MACE, cardiovascular death, fatal or non-fatal stroke, fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality. It remains unclear why updated guidance from NICE on the management of T2DM in adults fails to acknowledge these evidence-based cardiovascular benefits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Diabetes
British Journal of Diabetes ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
自引率
16.70%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信