交通信号灯系统——基本adl和以人为本的护理:对Asplin等人的评论。

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION
Alaa Abou Khzam
{"title":"交通信号灯系统——基本adl和以人为本的护理:对Asplin等人的评论。","authors":"Alaa Abou Khzam","doi":"10.1080/21679169.2022.2164793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I have read with great interest the study that was authored by Asplin and colleagues and published in the European Journal of Physiotherapy [1]. In this article, the authors investigated the concurrent validity of the traffic light system-BasicADL (TLS-BasicADL) on 50 patients with mixed medical diagnosis admitted to an oncologic/geriatric unit. In addition to that the authors evaluated the responsiveness of the TLS-BasicADL on 107 patients admitted to a geriatric/orthopaedic unit following hip fracture. The TLS-BasicADL is a scale to measure the level of functional independence to perform basic activities of daily living among the elderly population admitted to acute geriatric hospital settings [2]. The TLS-BasicADL is a scale that provides the multidisciplinary team with an understandable visual aid describing the independence of the geriatric population thus improving the communication of the multidisciplinary team [2]. The scale exhibited high inter-rater and fair intra-rater reliability among elderly individuals in a geriatric unit [2]. In their study, Asplin and colleagues [1] reported that the TLS-BasicADL displayed strong to excellent correlations for individual items with the modified Barthel index as well as the modified functional independence measure. The total score of the TLS-BasicADL was strongly correlated with the total score of the modified Barthel index as well as the total score of the modified functional independence measure. The authors of the study reported as well that most items were responsive to the changes in the function of the patients following the hip surgery. Communication is essential to the proper functioning of a hospital [3]. It is no surprise that physical therapists spend a considerable amount of time communicating with patients [4], this might be due to physical therapists being an integral part of the rehabilitation of patients to improve/regain their function. Thus, it is of paramount importance that researchers develop new methods that can improve the level of communication between therapists and other healthcare professionals. This is can be done largely due to the TLSBasicADL not just providing a simple system to describe a patient’s functioning but also can explain in detail without the need of much writing the extent that is needed by a patient to accomplish a specific task. Concerning geriatric patient satisfaction with physical therapy services, a recent cross-sectional analysis reported that more than half of elderly patients were dissatisfied with physical therapy [5]. The authors of the previously mentioned study recommended that physical therapists emphasise patient education [5]. Since the TLS-BasicADL is very understandable, physical therapists working in geriatric units and nursing homes can take advantage of the simplicity of the TLS-BasicADL to educate their patients about their level of functioning concerning their activities of daily living. The TLS-BasicADL can be used as well to help the patient set his/her own goals for physical therapy. By doing so, the elderly patient would be the centre of the therapeutic relationship and the care provided by the therapist would be patient-centred. From a physical therapist’s point of view, I believe that it is recommended that geriatric wards in hospitals and nursing homes begin integrating the use of the TLS-BasicADL. This is due to the excellent concurrent validity and the responsiveness of the scale [1] not to mention the high inter-rater reliability and fair intra-rater reliability of the scale [2] when applied among elderly individuals. Furthermore, the utilisation of the TLS-BasicADL can facilitate patient education and promote person-centred care in geriatric rehabilitation.","PeriodicalId":45694,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"25 1","pages":"56 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The traffic light system-BasicADL and person-centred care: a commentary on Asplin et al.\",\"authors\":\"Alaa Abou Khzam\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21679169.2022.2164793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I have read with great interest the study that was authored by Asplin and colleagues and published in the European Journal of Physiotherapy [1]. In this article, the authors investigated the concurrent validity of the traffic light system-BasicADL (TLS-BasicADL) on 50 patients with mixed medical diagnosis admitted to an oncologic/geriatric unit. In addition to that the authors evaluated the responsiveness of the TLS-BasicADL on 107 patients admitted to a geriatric/orthopaedic unit following hip fracture. The TLS-BasicADL is a scale to measure the level of functional independence to perform basic activities of daily living among the elderly population admitted to acute geriatric hospital settings [2]. The TLS-BasicADL is a scale that provides the multidisciplinary team with an understandable visual aid describing the independence of the geriatric population thus improving the communication of the multidisciplinary team [2]. The scale exhibited high inter-rater and fair intra-rater reliability among elderly individuals in a geriatric unit [2]. In their study, Asplin and colleagues [1] reported that the TLS-BasicADL displayed strong to excellent correlations for individual items with the modified Barthel index as well as the modified functional independence measure. The total score of the TLS-BasicADL was strongly correlated with the total score of the modified Barthel index as well as the total score of the modified functional independence measure. The authors of the study reported as well that most items were responsive to the changes in the function of the patients following the hip surgery. Communication is essential to the proper functioning of a hospital [3]. It is no surprise that physical therapists spend a considerable amount of time communicating with patients [4], this might be due to physical therapists being an integral part of the rehabilitation of patients to improve/regain their function. Thus, it is of paramount importance that researchers develop new methods that can improve the level of communication between therapists and other healthcare professionals. This is can be done largely due to the TLSBasicADL not just providing a simple system to describe a patient’s functioning but also can explain in detail without the need of much writing the extent that is needed by a patient to accomplish a specific task. Concerning geriatric patient satisfaction with physical therapy services, a recent cross-sectional analysis reported that more than half of elderly patients were dissatisfied with physical therapy [5]. The authors of the previously mentioned study recommended that physical therapists emphasise patient education [5]. Since the TLS-BasicADL is very understandable, physical therapists working in geriatric units and nursing homes can take advantage of the simplicity of the TLS-BasicADL to educate their patients about their level of functioning concerning their activities of daily living. The TLS-BasicADL can be used as well to help the patient set his/her own goals for physical therapy. By doing so, the elderly patient would be the centre of the therapeutic relationship and the care provided by the therapist would be patient-centred. From a physical therapist’s point of view, I believe that it is recommended that geriatric wards in hospitals and nursing homes begin integrating the use of the TLS-BasicADL. This is due to the excellent concurrent validity and the responsiveness of the scale [1] not to mention the high inter-rater reliability and fair intra-rater reliability of the scale [2] when applied among elderly individuals. Furthermore, the utilisation of the TLS-BasicADL can facilitate patient education and promote person-centred care in geriatric rehabilitation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"56 - 57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21679169.2022.2164793\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21679169.2022.2164793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我怀着极大的兴趣阅读了阿斯普林及其同事发表在《欧洲物理治疗杂志》上的研究报告。在本文中,作者研究了交通灯系统-基本adl (tls -基本adl)在50例肿瘤/老年住院的混合医学诊断患者中的并发有效性。此外,作者还评估了107例髋部骨折后入院的老年/骨科患者的TLS-BasicADL的反应性。TLS-BasicADL是一种衡量急性老年医院收治的老年人口进行基本日常生活活动的功能独立水平的量表[10]。TLS-BasicADL量表为多学科团队提供了一个可理解的视觉辅助工具,描述了老年人群的独立性,从而改善了多学科团队的沟通bbb。该量表在老年病单位bbb的老年人中表现出较高的评分间信度和公平的评分内信度。在他们的研究中,Asplin和同事[1]报告了TLS-BasicADL与修改后的Barthel指数以及修改后的功能独立性测量在单个项目上表现出很强的相关性。TLS-BasicADL总分与修正Barthel指数总分、修正功能独立性量表总分呈显著正相关。该研究的作者还报告说,大多数项目对髋关节手术后患者功能的变化有反应。沟通对医院的正常运作至关重要。毫无疑问,物理治疗师花费大量时间与患者交流,这可能是因为物理治疗师是患者康复中不可或缺的一部分,以改善/恢复他们的功能。因此,研究人员开发新的方法来提高治疗师和其他医疗保健专业人员之间的沟通水平是至关重要的。这在很大程度上是由于TLSBasicADL不仅提供了一个简单的系统来描述患者的功能,而且还可以在不需要太多文字的情况下详细解释患者完成特定任务所需的程度。关于老年患者对物理治疗服务的满意度,最近的一项横断面分析报告称,超过一半的老年患者对物理治疗不满意。前面提到的研究的作者建议物理治疗师强调病人教育。由于TLS-BasicADL非常容易理解,在老年病房和养老院工作的物理治疗师可以利用TLS-BasicADL的简单性来教育他们的病人关于他们日常生活活动的功能水平。TLS-BasicADL也可以用来帮助患者设定自己的物理治疗目标。通过这样做,老年患者将成为治疗关系的中心,治疗师提供的护理将以患者为中心。从物理治疗师的角度来看,我认为建议医院和养老院的老年病房开始整合使用TLS-BasicADL。这是由于[1]量表具有优异的并发效度和反应性,更不用说[2]量表在老年人中应用时具有较高的量表间信度和相当的量表内信度。此外,使用TLS-BasicADL可以促进患者教育和促进以人为本的老年康复护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The traffic light system-BasicADL and person-centred care: a commentary on Asplin et al.
I have read with great interest the study that was authored by Asplin and colleagues and published in the European Journal of Physiotherapy [1]. In this article, the authors investigated the concurrent validity of the traffic light system-BasicADL (TLS-BasicADL) on 50 patients with mixed medical diagnosis admitted to an oncologic/geriatric unit. In addition to that the authors evaluated the responsiveness of the TLS-BasicADL on 107 patients admitted to a geriatric/orthopaedic unit following hip fracture. The TLS-BasicADL is a scale to measure the level of functional independence to perform basic activities of daily living among the elderly population admitted to acute geriatric hospital settings [2]. The TLS-BasicADL is a scale that provides the multidisciplinary team with an understandable visual aid describing the independence of the geriatric population thus improving the communication of the multidisciplinary team [2]. The scale exhibited high inter-rater and fair intra-rater reliability among elderly individuals in a geriatric unit [2]. In their study, Asplin and colleagues [1] reported that the TLS-BasicADL displayed strong to excellent correlations for individual items with the modified Barthel index as well as the modified functional independence measure. The total score of the TLS-BasicADL was strongly correlated with the total score of the modified Barthel index as well as the total score of the modified functional independence measure. The authors of the study reported as well that most items were responsive to the changes in the function of the patients following the hip surgery. Communication is essential to the proper functioning of a hospital [3]. It is no surprise that physical therapists spend a considerable amount of time communicating with patients [4], this might be due to physical therapists being an integral part of the rehabilitation of patients to improve/regain their function. Thus, it is of paramount importance that researchers develop new methods that can improve the level of communication between therapists and other healthcare professionals. This is can be done largely due to the TLSBasicADL not just providing a simple system to describe a patient’s functioning but also can explain in detail without the need of much writing the extent that is needed by a patient to accomplish a specific task. Concerning geriatric patient satisfaction with physical therapy services, a recent cross-sectional analysis reported that more than half of elderly patients were dissatisfied with physical therapy [5]. The authors of the previously mentioned study recommended that physical therapists emphasise patient education [5]. Since the TLS-BasicADL is very understandable, physical therapists working in geriatric units and nursing homes can take advantage of the simplicity of the TLS-BasicADL to educate their patients about their level of functioning concerning their activities of daily living. The TLS-BasicADL can be used as well to help the patient set his/her own goals for physical therapy. By doing so, the elderly patient would be the centre of the therapeutic relationship and the care provided by the therapist would be patient-centred. From a physical therapist’s point of view, I believe that it is recommended that geriatric wards in hospitals and nursing homes begin integrating the use of the TLS-BasicADL. This is due to the excellent concurrent validity and the responsiveness of the scale [1] not to mention the high inter-rater reliability and fair intra-rater reliability of the scale [2] when applied among elderly individuals. Furthermore, the utilisation of the TLS-BasicADL can facilitate patient education and promote person-centred care in geriatric rehabilitation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信