判例法趋势:只是一种形式!欧盟增值税实质重于形式与进项增值税抵扣权

IF 1.2 Q2 LAW
Intertax Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.54648/taxi2022051
Madeleine Merkx
{"title":"判例法趋势:只是一种形式!欧盟增值税实质重于形式与进项增值税抵扣权","authors":"Madeleine Merkx","doi":"10.54648/taxi2022051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When it comes to the right to deduct input tax, substance in principle takes precedence over form. The CJEU has already ruled several times that the fundamental principle of the neutrality of VAT requires that if the substantive conditions for the right of deduction are met, this right can be exercised even when certain formal conditions are not met. In this article the author addresses recent case law of the CJEU on the distinction between formal and substantive conditions for the exercise of the right of deduction and the right to refund. The following topics are addressed: (1) Incorrect or incomplete invoices, (2) mistakes and refunds under Directive 2008/9/EC, (3) including an asset in the business assets and (4) VAT deduction in the event of late filing of intra-Community acquisitions. The recent CJEU cases will be analysed in the light of previous and pending case law providing the reader with an overview of the current situation.\nformality, substantive condition, deduction, refund, invoice, VAT fraud, business assets, intracommunity acquisition, neutrality principle, principle of proportionality","PeriodicalId":45365,"journal":{"name":"Intertax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Case Law Trends: Just a Formality!: Substance over Form in EU VAT and the Right to Deduct Input VAT\",\"authors\":\"Madeleine Merkx\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/taxi2022051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When it comes to the right to deduct input tax, substance in principle takes precedence over form. The CJEU has already ruled several times that the fundamental principle of the neutrality of VAT requires that if the substantive conditions for the right of deduction are met, this right can be exercised even when certain formal conditions are not met. In this article the author addresses recent case law of the CJEU on the distinction between formal and substantive conditions for the exercise of the right of deduction and the right to refund. The following topics are addressed: (1) Incorrect or incomplete invoices, (2) mistakes and refunds under Directive 2008/9/EC, (3) including an asset in the business assets and (4) VAT deduction in the event of late filing of intra-Community acquisitions. The recent CJEU cases will be analysed in the light of previous and pending case law providing the reader with an overview of the current situation.\\nformality, substantive condition, deduction, refund, invoice, VAT fraud, business assets, intracommunity acquisition, neutrality principle, principle of proportionality\",\"PeriodicalId\":45365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intertax\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intertax\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2022051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intertax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2022051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于进项税的扣除权,原则上实质优先于形式。欧盟法院已经多次裁定,增值税中性的基本原则要求,如果满足扣除权的实质条件,即使不满足某些形式条件,也可以行使这一权利。在这篇文章中,作者论述了欧盟法院最近关于行使扣除权和退款权的形式和实质条件之间的区别的判例法。涉及以下主题:(1)发票不正确或不完整,(2)第2008/9/EC号指令下的错误和退款,(3)将资产包括在商业资产中,以及(4)社区内部收购延迟提交时的增值税扣除。最近的CJEU案件将根据以前和未决的判例法进行分析,为读者提供当前情况的概述。形式、实质性条件、扣除、退款、发票、增值税欺诈、商业资产、社团内部收购、中立原则、比例原则
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Case Law Trends: Just a Formality!: Substance over Form in EU VAT and the Right to Deduct Input VAT
When it comes to the right to deduct input tax, substance in principle takes precedence over form. The CJEU has already ruled several times that the fundamental principle of the neutrality of VAT requires that if the substantive conditions for the right of deduction are met, this right can be exercised even when certain formal conditions are not met. In this article the author addresses recent case law of the CJEU on the distinction between formal and substantive conditions for the exercise of the right of deduction and the right to refund. The following topics are addressed: (1) Incorrect or incomplete invoices, (2) mistakes and refunds under Directive 2008/9/EC, (3) including an asset in the business assets and (4) VAT deduction in the event of late filing of intra-Community acquisitions. The recent CJEU cases will be analysed in the light of previous and pending case law providing the reader with an overview of the current situation. formality, substantive condition, deduction, refund, invoice, VAT fraud, business assets, intracommunity acquisition, neutrality principle, principle of proportionality
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intertax
Intertax LAW-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信