内窥镜鼻窦手术中区域鼻阻滞与全麻及右美托咪定全麻的比较

IF 0.6 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Moustafa Atef Moustafa Hamouda, Nahed E. Salama, Samia A. Hassan, E. Aboseif, R. A. Abdelrazik
{"title":"内窥镜鼻窦手术中区域鼻阻滞与全麻及右美托咪定全麻的比较","authors":"Moustafa Atef Moustafa Hamouda, Nahed E. Salama, Samia A. Hassan, E. Aboseif, R. A. Abdelrazik","doi":"10.1080/11101849.2023.2192097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Research findings are inconsistent regarding the efficiency of regional nasal blocks over hypotensive techniques. The current study aimed to compare regional nasal block to dexmedetomidine (DEX) for surgical field optimization. Methods A total of 70 patients (ASA I or II) aged 18 to 65 years were divided into two groups (35 patients each). The DEX group received 1 µg/kg of DEX in 10 minutes after induction of anesthesia, followed by 0.7 µg/kg/hour during maintenance of anesthesia. The other group [Sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) group] was subjected to regional nasal block by SPGB immediately after induction of general anesthesia. This was done via a transoral approach using 2 ml of a mixture of lidocaine (2%) and bupivacaine (0.5%) for each side. Results Surgical conditions were satisfactory in all patients of both groups, but significantly better with bilateral SPGB. In addition, the block group had also improved extubation characteristics and postoperative analgesia. Patients who received bilateral SPGB complained significantly of dental numbness. Conclusions Both DEX and regional nasal block provided excellent functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) with a high score of surgeons’ satisfaction. The SPGB can provide better surgical field optimization with less blood loss, less intraoperative analgesic consumption, and early extubation with minor complications, and better immediate postoperative pain profile. So, SPGB can be used efficiently and safely in combination with general anesthesia in patients undergoing FESS.","PeriodicalId":11437,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between combined regional nasal block and general anesthesia versus general anesthesia with dexmedetomidine during endoscopic sinus surgery\",\"authors\":\"Moustafa Atef Moustafa Hamouda, Nahed E. Salama, Samia A. Hassan, E. Aboseif, R. A. Abdelrazik\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/11101849.2023.2192097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background Research findings are inconsistent regarding the efficiency of regional nasal blocks over hypotensive techniques. The current study aimed to compare regional nasal block to dexmedetomidine (DEX) for surgical field optimization. Methods A total of 70 patients (ASA I or II) aged 18 to 65 years were divided into two groups (35 patients each). The DEX group received 1 µg/kg of DEX in 10 minutes after induction of anesthesia, followed by 0.7 µg/kg/hour during maintenance of anesthesia. The other group [Sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) group] was subjected to regional nasal block by SPGB immediately after induction of general anesthesia. This was done via a transoral approach using 2 ml of a mixture of lidocaine (2%) and bupivacaine (0.5%) for each side. Results Surgical conditions were satisfactory in all patients of both groups, but significantly better with bilateral SPGB. In addition, the block group had also improved extubation characteristics and postoperative analgesia. Patients who received bilateral SPGB complained significantly of dental numbness. Conclusions Both DEX and regional nasal block provided excellent functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) with a high score of surgeons’ satisfaction. The SPGB can provide better surgical field optimization with less blood loss, less intraoperative analgesic consumption, and early extubation with minor complications, and better immediate postoperative pain profile. So, SPGB can be used efficiently and safely in combination with general anesthesia in patients undergoing FESS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2023.2192097\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2023.2192097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between combined regional nasal block and general anesthesia versus general anesthesia with dexmedetomidine during endoscopic sinus surgery
ABSTRACT Background Research findings are inconsistent regarding the efficiency of regional nasal blocks over hypotensive techniques. The current study aimed to compare regional nasal block to dexmedetomidine (DEX) for surgical field optimization. Methods A total of 70 patients (ASA I or II) aged 18 to 65 years were divided into two groups (35 patients each). The DEX group received 1 µg/kg of DEX in 10 minutes after induction of anesthesia, followed by 0.7 µg/kg/hour during maintenance of anesthesia. The other group [Sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) group] was subjected to regional nasal block by SPGB immediately after induction of general anesthesia. This was done via a transoral approach using 2 ml of a mixture of lidocaine (2%) and bupivacaine (0.5%) for each side. Results Surgical conditions were satisfactory in all patients of both groups, but significantly better with bilateral SPGB. In addition, the block group had also improved extubation characteristics and postoperative analgesia. Patients who received bilateral SPGB complained significantly of dental numbness. Conclusions Both DEX and regional nasal block provided excellent functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) with a high score of surgeons’ satisfaction. The SPGB can provide better surgical field optimization with less blood loss, less intraoperative analgesic consumption, and early extubation with minor complications, and better immediate postoperative pain profile. So, SPGB can be used efficiently and safely in combination with general anesthesia in patients undergoing FESS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信