{"title":"古汉语和中古汉语的多动词结构","authors":"Wenchao Li","doi":"10.1075/APLV.16013.LI","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Multiple verb constructions have been studied intensively in Chinese. However, given the typological differences between the\n Indo-European languages and Chinese, it is no surprise that the application of a ‘Western’ notion, namely ‘serial verb\n construction’ (SVC), has caused much debate. This study provides a working definition of ‘SVC’ in Old Chinese and then turns to\n diachronic issues, for example, the combinatorial possibilities of multiple verbs in Old Chinese, pre-Middle Chinese, and Middle\n Chinese, clarifying which kind of complex constructions may be regarded as verb serialising and which as verb compounding. With\n this in place, the study approaches an understanding of the evolution of multiple verb formations in Chinese. The finding reveals\n that multiple verbs in Old Chinese are combined via verb serialisation. Six combinatorial possibilities are confirmed: (a)\n unergative V + unergative V; (b) transitive V + unaccusative V; (c) unaccusative V + unaccusative V (change of state); (d)\n unergative V + unaccusative V; (e) transitive V + transitive V; (f) unaccusative V + unaccusative V (motion). These can be further\n classified into two groups: Group I: (a)–(d) are successive SVCs; Group II: (e)–(f) are\n coordinate SVCs. In pre-Middle Chinese, there are signs of verb compounding. The occurrence of disyllabic\n word roots in the Early Han Dynasty as well as (de)grammaticalisation may be responsible for this. In Middle Chinese, the\n grammaticalisation of transitive change-of-state verbs, and the degrammaticalisation of motion verbs, led to three different\n lexical categories: (a) partial intransitive change-of-state verbs turned into resultative complements (resulting in [transitive\n V + unaccusative V] SVC transiting into predicate-complement V-V (change-of-state)); (b) partial motion verbs degrammaticalised\n and turned into directional complements (resulting in [unergative V + unaccusative V] SVC transiting into predicate-complement V-V\n (motion)); and (c) the first verb in [coordinate SVC] receives preverbalisation (giving rise to modifier-predicate V-V).","PeriodicalId":29731,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Language Variation","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-verb constructions in Old Chinese and Middle Chinese\",\"authors\":\"Wenchao Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/APLV.16013.LI\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Multiple verb constructions have been studied intensively in Chinese. However, given the typological differences between the\\n Indo-European languages and Chinese, it is no surprise that the application of a ‘Western’ notion, namely ‘serial verb\\n construction’ (SVC), has caused much debate. This study provides a working definition of ‘SVC’ in Old Chinese and then turns to\\n diachronic issues, for example, the combinatorial possibilities of multiple verbs in Old Chinese, pre-Middle Chinese, and Middle\\n Chinese, clarifying which kind of complex constructions may be regarded as verb serialising and which as verb compounding. With\\n this in place, the study approaches an understanding of the evolution of multiple verb formations in Chinese. The finding reveals\\n that multiple verbs in Old Chinese are combined via verb serialisation. Six combinatorial possibilities are confirmed: (a)\\n unergative V + unergative V; (b) transitive V + unaccusative V; (c) unaccusative V + unaccusative V (change of state); (d)\\n unergative V + unaccusative V; (e) transitive V + transitive V; (f) unaccusative V + unaccusative V (motion). These can be further\\n classified into two groups: Group I: (a)–(d) are successive SVCs; Group II: (e)–(f) are\\n coordinate SVCs. In pre-Middle Chinese, there are signs of verb compounding. The occurrence of disyllabic\\n word roots in the Early Han Dynasty as well as (de)grammaticalisation may be responsible for this. In Middle Chinese, the\\n grammaticalisation of transitive change-of-state verbs, and the degrammaticalisation of motion verbs, led to three different\\n lexical categories: (a) partial intransitive change-of-state verbs turned into resultative complements (resulting in [transitive\\n V + unaccusative V] SVC transiting into predicate-complement V-V (change-of-state)); (b) partial motion verbs degrammaticalised\\n and turned into directional complements (resulting in [unergative V + unaccusative V] SVC transiting into predicate-complement V-V\\n (motion)); and (c) the first verb in [coordinate SVC] receives preverbalisation (giving rise to modifier-predicate V-V).\",\"PeriodicalId\":29731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Language Variation\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Language Variation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/APLV.16013.LI\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Language Variation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/APLV.16013.LI","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multi-verb constructions in Old Chinese and Middle Chinese
Multiple verb constructions have been studied intensively in Chinese. However, given the typological differences between the
Indo-European languages and Chinese, it is no surprise that the application of a ‘Western’ notion, namely ‘serial verb
construction’ (SVC), has caused much debate. This study provides a working definition of ‘SVC’ in Old Chinese and then turns to
diachronic issues, for example, the combinatorial possibilities of multiple verbs in Old Chinese, pre-Middle Chinese, and Middle
Chinese, clarifying which kind of complex constructions may be regarded as verb serialising and which as verb compounding. With
this in place, the study approaches an understanding of the evolution of multiple verb formations in Chinese. The finding reveals
that multiple verbs in Old Chinese are combined via verb serialisation. Six combinatorial possibilities are confirmed: (a)
unergative V + unergative V; (b) transitive V + unaccusative V; (c) unaccusative V + unaccusative V (change of state); (d)
unergative V + unaccusative V; (e) transitive V + transitive V; (f) unaccusative V + unaccusative V (motion). These can be further
classified into two groups: Group I: (a)–(d) are successive SVCs; Group II: (e)–(f) are
coordinate SVCs. In pre-Middle Chinese, there are signs of verb compounding. The occurrence of disyllabic
word roots in the Early Han Dynasty as well as (de)grammaticalisation may be responsible for this. In Middle Chinese, the
grammaticalisation of transitive change-of-state verbs, and the degrammaticalisation of motion verbs, led to three different
lexical categories: (a) partial intransitive change-of-state verbs turned into resultative complements (resulting in [transitive
V + unaccusative V] SVC transiting into predicate-complement V-V (change-of-state)); (b) partial motion verbs degrammaticalised
and turned into directional complements (resulting in [unergative V + unaccusative V] SVC transiting into predicate-complement V-V
(motion)); and (c) the first verb in [coordinate SVC] receives preverbalisation (giving rise to modifier-predicate V-V).