心理安全、心理授权、企业内部行为和个人绩效测量的验证

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS
M. Mahmoud, S. Ahmad, Donny Abdul Latief Poespowidjojo
{"title":"心理安全、心理授权、企业内部行为和个人绩效测量的验证","authors":"M. Mahmoud, S. Ahmad, Donny Abdul Latief Poespowidjojo","doi":"10.1108/rausp-11-2020-0252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to assess the validity of the psychological safety (PS), psychological empowerment (PE), intrapreneurial behaviour (IB) and individual performance (IP) construct measurements originally developed in Western individualistic cultures.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nProportionate stratified systematic sampling was used among the production/operations middle managers in Nigerian medium enterprises (MEs), resulting in 355 valid responses. The measurements were analysed through internal consistency analysis, content, convergent and discriminant validity analysis.\n\n\nFindings\nThe result shows that all four construct measurements are suitable and appropriate to gauge the respective constructs in collectivistic cultures such as Nigeria.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nCross-sectional self-reported data were used to analyse the result of this study, which may lead to common method variance.\n\n\nPractical implications\nOrganizations, especially MEs, can use the validated measurements of this study to enhance work results in the Nigerian context.\n\n\nSocial implications\nCollectivistic cultures can benefit from the widely used measurements of PS, PE, IB and IP despite been originally developed in Western individualistic cultures.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper extends the body of knowledge by validating the measurements of PS, PE, IB and IP in collectivistic cultures such as Nigeria. Measurement validation for these constructs is scarce in this context. Thus, this study will provide a consistent and efficient reference for forthcoming studies and improve the credibility and replicability of future research results in collectivistic cultures.\n","PeriodicalId":43400,"journal":{"name":"RAUSP Management Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the psychological safety, psychological empowerment, intrapreneurial behaviour and individual performance measurements\",\"authors\":\"M. Mahmoud, S. Ahmad, Donny Abdul Latief Poespowidjojo\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/rausp-11-2020-0252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this study is to assess the validity of the psychological safety (PS), psychological empowerment (PE), intrapreneurial behaviour (IB) and individual performance (IP) construct measurements originally developed in Western individualistic cultures.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nProportionate stratified systematic sampling was used among the production/operations middle managers in Nigerian medium enterprises (MEs), resulting in 355 valid responses. The measurements were analysed through internal consistency analysis, content, convergent and discriminant validity analysis.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe result shows that all four construct measurements are suitable and appropriate to gauge the respective constructs in collectivistic cultures such as Nigeria.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nCross-sectional self-reported data were used to analyse the result of this study, which may lead to common method variance.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nOrganizations, especially MEs, can use the validated measurements of this study to enhance work results in the Nigerian context.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nCollectivistic cultures can benefit from the widely used measurements of PS, PE, IB and IP despite been originally developed in Western individualistic cultures.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis paper extends the body of knowledge by validating the measurements of PS, PE, IB and IP in collectivistic cultures such as Nigeria. Measurement validation for these constructs is scarce in this context. Thus, this study will provide a consistent and efficient reference for forthcoming studies and improve the credibility and replicability of future research results in collectivistic cultures.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RAUSP Management Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RAUSP Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/rausp-11-2020-0252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAUSP Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rausp-11-2020-0252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究的目的是评估最初在西方个人主义文化中发展起来的心理安全(PS)、心理授权(PE)、创业内行为(IB)和个人绩效(IP)结构测量的有效性。设计/方法/方法在尼日利亚中型企业(MEs)的生产/运营中层管理人员中使用了比例分层系统抽样,得到了355份有效回复。通过内部一致性分析、内容效度分析、收敛效度分析和判别效度分析对测量结果进行分析。结果表明,所有四种结构测量都是合适的,适合于衡量尼日利亚等集体主义文化中各自的结构。研究局限性/意义本研究采用横断面自我报告数据来分析研究结果,这可能导致共同方法方差。实际意义组织,特别是中小企业,可以使用本研究的有效测量来提高尼日利亚背景下的工作成果。社会意义集体主义文化可以从广泛使用的PS、PE、IB和IP测量中受益,尽管它们最初是在西方个人主义文化中发展起来的。原创性/价值本文通过验证尼日利亚等集体主义文化中PS、PE、IB和IP的测量值,扩展了知识体系。在这种情况下,这些构造的测量验证是稀缺的。因此,本研究将为未来的研究提供一致和有效的参考,并提高未来研究结果在集体主义文化中的可信度和可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the psychological safety, psychological empowerment, intrapreneurial behaviour and individual performance measurements
Purpose The purpose of this study is to assess the validity of the psychological safety (PS), psychological empowerment (PE), intrapreneurial behaviour (IB) and individual performance (IP) construct measurements originally developed in Western individualistic cultures. Design/methodology/approach Proportionate stratified systematic sampling was used among the production/operations middle managers in Nigerian medium enterprises (MEs), resulting in 355 valid responses. The measurements were analysed through internal consistency analysis, content, convergent and discriminant validity analysis. Findings The result shows that all four construct measurements are suitable and appropriate to gauge the respective constructs in collectivistic cultures such as Nigeria. Research limitations/implications Cross-sectional self-reported data were used to analyse the result of this study, which may lead to common method variance. Practical implications Organizations, especially MEs, can use the validated measurements of this study to enhance work results in the Nigerian context. Social implications Collectivistic cultures can benefit from the widely used measurements of PS, PE, IB and IP despite been originally developed in Western individualistic cultures. Originality/value This paper extends the body of knowledge by validating the measurements of PS, PE, IB and IP in collectivistic cultures such as Nigeria. Measurement validation for these constructs is scarce in this context. Thus, this study will provide a consistent and efficient reference for forthcoming studies and improve the credibility and replicability of future research results in collectivistic cultures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信