CBQ当前关于当代问题的专题论文

Q4 Social Sciences
{"title":"CBQ当前关于当代问题的专题论文","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/10948007.2018.1548195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We hear a lot about “diversity” and “inclusion” in the academy, in some business circles, and in various social, civic and political contexts. What about in publishing? How, specifically, does the academic publishing world fare in this arena? Certainly, publishing in general is not immune from these concerns. For instance, in 2015, Lee and Low book publishers initiated a survey to gather data about diversity among publishing staff and reviewers. The goal was to create a “diversity baseline survey” that would garner participation from “major review journals and publishers” to obtain an aggregate view documenting the presence—or absence—of diversity in the trade industry. Results released the following year, in 2016, included responses from 34 publishers and 8 review journals, and they were revealing. In their snapshot of the “industry overall,” the Lee and Low survey results showed representation in four categories. Here are some highlights from their results:","PeriodicalId":38174,"journal":{"name":"Communication Booknotes Quarterly","volume":"49 1","pages":"109 - 111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10948007.2018.1548195","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CBQ CURRENTS Topical Essays About Contemporary Issues\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10948007.2018.1548195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We hear a lot about “diversity” and “inclusion” in the academy, in some business circles, and in various social, civic and political contexts. What about in publishing? How, specifically, does the academic publishing world fare in this arena? Certainly, publishing in general is not immune from these concerns. For instance, in 2015, Lee and Low book publishers initiated a survey to gather data about diversity among publishing staff and reviewers. The goal was to create a “diversity baseline survey” that would garner participation from “major review journals and publishers” to obtain an aggregate view documenting the presence—or absence—of diversity in the trade industry. Results released the following year, in 2016, included responses from 34 publishers and 8 review journals, and they were revealing. In their snapshot of the “industry overall,” the Lee and Low survey results showed representation in four categories. Here are some highlights from their results:\",\"PeriodicalId\":38174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication Booknotes Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"109 - 111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10948007.2018.1548195\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication Booknotes Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10948007.2018.1548195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Booknotes Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10948007.2018.1548195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们在学院、一些商界以及各种社会、公民和政治背景下听到了很多关于“多样性”和“包容性”的说法。出版业怎么样?具体来说,学术出版界在这一领域的表现如何?当然,一般出版业也不能免受这些担忧的影响。例如,2015年,Lee和Low图书出版商发起了一项调查,收集出版人员和评论家的多样性数据。目标是创建一个“多样性基线调查”,吸引“主要评论期刊和出版商”的参与,以获得一个记录贸易行业存在或不存在多样性的总体观点。第二年,即2016年发布的结果包括34家出版商和8家评论期刊的回复,这些回复很有启发性。Lee和Low的调查结果显示,他们对“整个行业”的看法分为四类。以下是他们研究结果中的一些亮点:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CBQ CURRENTS Topical Essays About Contemporary Issues
We hear a lot about “diversity” and “inclusion” in the academy, in some business circles, and in various social, civic and political contexts. What about in publishing? How, specifically, does the academic publishing world fare in this arena? Certainly, publishing in general is not immune from these concerns. For instance, in 2015, Lee and Low book publishers initiated a survey to gather data about diversity among publishing staff and reviewers. The goal was to create a “diversity baseline survey” that would garner participation from “major review journals and publishers” to obtain an aggregate view documenting the presence—or absence—of diversity in the trade industry. Results released the following year, in 2016, included responses from 34 publishers and 8 review journals, and they were revealing. In their snapshot of the “industry overall,” the Lee and Low survey results showed representation in four categories. Here are some highlights from their results:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Communication Booknotes Quarterly
Communication Booknotes Quarterly Social Sciences-Communication
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信