小区域城市中密度住房的障碍和机遇:来自凯恩斯的利益相关者观点

IF 1.2 Q2 Social Sciences
Sarah Gibson, L. Law
{"title":"小区域城市中密度住房的障碍和机遇:来自凯恩斯的利益相关者观点","authors":"Sarah Gibson, L. Law","doi":"10.1080/07293682.2023.2183225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Medium Density Housing (MDH) is advocated for sustainable urban growth while retaining the amenity and liveability of lower-density urban forms. Despite these advantages, affordable and diverse MDH proves challenging to implement in suburbs with access to employment and services. While scholars do explore barriers and solutions to implementing MDH in Australia, regional city contexts are less understood. Stakeholder perspectives on MDH and its implementation are also limited. This research presents a stakeholder analysis in the regional city of Cairns to address these important gaps. The research employs a case study approach including semi-structured interviews with 19 stakeholders across public and private sectors: developers, architects/building designers, government and industry planners and real estate agents. Stakeholders expressed barriers that are well-documented in the literature–such as the risk-averse nature of the finance sector–but also note key regional differences such as land constraints in world heritage areas, poor public transport, distance from supply chains, soaring insurance costs and susceptibility to cyclones. In the face of these challenges, Cairns stakeholders argue for certain forms of MDH alongside strategic planning, leadership, cross-sectoral and community engagement to support effective MDH infill. These insights are pertinent to other regional cities struggling with MDH in low density contexts. Practitioner pointers MDH needs contextualisation in places outside Australia’s capital cities, as demand and supply side issues require nuanced understanding. Cross-sectoral conversations are key to understanding the complex barriers and opportunities for MDH in regional cities. Strategic planning for where to locate MDH is vital in a context of climate change and coastal hazards.","PeriodicalId":45599,"journal":{"name":"Australian Planner","volume":"58 1","pages":"95 - 109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and opportunities for medium density housing in small, regional cities: stakeholder perspectives from Cairns\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Gibson, L. Law\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07293682.2023.2183225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Medium Density Housing (MDH) is advocated for sustainable urban growth while retaining the amenity and liveability of lower-density urban forms. Despite these advantages, affordable and diverse MDH proves challenging to implement in suburbs with access to employment and services. While scholars do explore barriers and solutions to implementing MDH in Australia, regional city contexts are less understood. Stakeholder perspectives on MDH and its implementation are also limited. This research presents a stakeholder analysis in the regional city of Cairns to address these important gaps. The research employs a case study approach including semi-structured interviews with 19 stakeholders across public and private sectors: developers, architects/building designers, government and industry planners and real estate agents. Stakeholders expressed barriers that are well-documented in the literature–such as the risk-averse nature of the finance sector–but also note key regional differences such as land constraints in world heritage areas, poor public transport, distance from supply chains, soaring insurance costs and susceptibility to cyclones. In the face of these challenges, Cairns stakeholders argue for certain forms of MDH alongside strategic planning, leadership, cross-sectoral and community engagement to support effective MDH infill. These insights are pertinent to other regional cities struggling with MDH in low density contexts. Practitioner pointers MDH needs contextualisation in places outside Australia’s capital cities, as demand and supply side issues require nuanced understanding. Cross-sectoral conversations are key to understanding the complex barriers and opportunities for MDH in regional cities. Strategic planning for where to locate MDH is vital in a context of climate change and coastal hazards.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Planner\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"95 - 109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Planner\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2023.2183225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Planner","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2023.2183225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

中密度住宅(MDH)提倡可持续的城市发展,同时保留低密度城市形式的舒适性和宜居性。尽管有这些优势,但事实证明,在拥有就业和服务的郊区实施负担得起的多样化MDH具有挑战性。虽然学者们确实探索了在澳大利亚实施MDH的障碍和解决方案,但对区域城市背景的了解较少。利益相关者对MDH及其实施的看法也很有限。本研究提出了凯恩斯地区城市的利益相关者分析,以解决这些重要差距。本研究采用个案研究方法,包括与19个公共和私营部门的利益相关者进行半结构化访谈,包括开发商、建筑师/建筑设计师、政府和行业规划师以及房地产经纪人。利益相关者表达了文献中有充分记载的障碍,如金融部门的风险规避性质,但也指出了关键的区域差异,如世界遗产地区的土地限制、公共交通不发达、距离供应链较远、保险成本飙升以及易受飓风影响。面对这些挑战,凯恩斯的利益相关者主张在战略规划、领导、跨部门和社区参与的基础上,建立某种形式的MDH,以支持有效的MDH填充。这些见解与其他在低密度背景下与MDH作斗争的区域性城市有关。从业者指出,MDH需要在澳大利亚首都以外的地方进行背景化,因为需求和供应方面的问题需要细致入微的理解。跨部门对话是了解区域城市妇幼保健面临的复杂障碍和机遇的关键。在气候变化和沿海灾害的背景下,对MDH定位的战略规划至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and opportunities for medium density housing in small, regional cities: stakeholder perspectives from Cairns
ABSTRACT Medium Density Housing (MDH) is advocated for sustainable urban growth while retaining the amenity and liveability of lower-density urban forms. Despite these advantages, affordable and diverse MDH proves challenging to implement in suburbs with access to employment and services. While scholars do explore barriers and solutions to implementing MDH in Australia, regional city contexts are less understood. Stakeholder perspectives on MDH and its implementation are also limited. This research presents a stakeholder analysis in the regional city of Cairns to address these important gaps. The research employs a case study approach including semi-structured interviews with 19 stakeholders across public and private sectors: developers, architects/building designers, government and industry planners and real estate agents. Stakeholders expressed barriers that are well-documented in the literature–such as the risk-averse nature of the finance sector–but also note key regional differences such as land constraints in world heritage areas, poor public transport, distance from supply chains, soaring insurance costs and susceptibility to cyclones. In the face of these challenges, Cairns stakeholders argue for certain forms of MDH alongside strategic planning, leadership, cross-sectoral and community engagement to support effective MDH infill. These insights are pertinent to other regional cities struggling with MDH in low density contexts. Practitioner pointers MDH needs contextualisation in places outside Australia’s capital cities, as demand and supply side issues require nuanced understanding. Cross-sectoral conversations are key to understanding the complex barriers and opportunities for MDH in regional cities. Strategic planning for where to locate MDH is vital in a context of climate change and coastal hazards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Planner
Australian Planner REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信