摄入的氨基酸/蛋白质在促进抗阻运动训练适应衰老中的作用:荟萃分析的分析

Q3 Medicine
Abbas K. Doctor, J. Monnig, Caroline N. Kerr, Alexandra M. Bagg, C. Pickering, P. Reidy
{"title":"摄入的氨基酸/蛋白质在促进抗阻运动训练适应衰老中的作用:荟萃分析的分析","authors":"Abbas K. Doctor, J. Monnig, Caroline N. Kerr, Alexandra M. Bagg, C. Pickering, P. Reidy","doi":"10.3233/nha-220183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A current lack of consensus exists regarding the effect of protein supplementation during resistance exercise in aging adult on the phenotypic adaptation. Thus, we critically assessed the collection of meta-analytic evidence to provide clarity regarding the differences between meta-analyses examining the combined effectiveness of chronic exposure to PRO/AA supplementation and resistance exercise to enhance the adaptive response. Thirteen meta-analyses, with relatively similar titles, presented different results on the topic. This divergence is mainly due to an inconsistent study selection process resulting in distinct study populations and varied types of protein-focused nutritional interventions and not RCT study quality. The methods applied to extract and estimate effects from RCTs with incorrectly formatted data for meta-analyses likely provide an additional reason for divergent results. PRO/AA supplements (when combined with resistance exercise training) produced a positive, albeit minor effect on the promotion of whole-body lean mass growth, yet a minimal and inconsistent effect on muscle mass, muscle strength, or functional capacity. The lack of an effect was skewed in studies with a higher proportion of obese and overweight participants and somewhat less noticeable in those containing sarcopenic and frail older adults, who would have the greatest need for an intervention to enhance muscle mass. Researchers are encouraged to provide the change scores mean and standard deviations for all their outcomes by group or even making the data sets available to improve future meta-analyses and advance the field.","PeriodicalId":37419,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and Healthy Aging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of ingested amino acids/protein in the promotion of resistance exercise-training adaptations in aging: Analysis of meta-analyses\",\"authors\":\"Abbas K. Doctor, J. Monnig, Caroline N. Kerr, Alexandra M. Bagg, C. Pickering, P. Reidy\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/nha-220183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A current lack of consensus exists regarding the effect of protein supplementation during resistance exercise in aging adult on the phenotypic adaptation. Thus, we critically assessed the collection of meta-analytic evidence to provide clarity regarding the differences between meta-analyses examining the combined effectiveness of chronic exposure to PRO/AA supplementation and resistance exercise to enhance the adaptive response. Thirteen meta-analyses, with relatively similar titles, presented different results on the topic. This divergence is mainly due to an inconsistent study selection process resulting in distinct study populations and varied types of protein-focused nutritional interventions and not RCT study quality. The methods applied to extract and estimate effects from RCTs with incorrectly formatted data for meta-analyses likely provide an additional reason for divergent results. PRO/AA supplements (when combined with resistance exercise training) produced a positive, albeit minor effect on the promotion of whole-body lean mass growth, yet a minimal and inconsistent effect on muscle mass, muscle strength, or functional capacity. The lack of an effect was skewed in studies with a higher proportion of obese and overweight participants and somewhat less noticeable in those containing sarcopenic and frail older adults, who would have the greatest need for an intervention to enhance muscle mass. Researchers are encouraged to provide the change scores mean and standard deviations for all their outcomes by group or even making the data sets available to improve future meta-analyses and advance the field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition and Healthy Aging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition and Healthy Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/nha-220183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and Healthy Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/nha-220183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前缺乏共识的是,在抗阻运动中补充蛋白质对老年人表型适应的影响。因此,我们对收集的meta分析证据进行了批判性评估,以明确meta分析之间的差异,这些meta分析考察了长期暴露于PRO/AA补充剂和阻力运动增强适应性反应的联合有效性。13项标题相对相似的荟萃分析对这一主题给出了不同的结果。这种差异主要是由于不一致的研究选择过程导致不同的研究人群和不同类型的以蛋白质为重点的营养干预,而不是随机对照试验研究的质量。从格式不正确的随机对照试验中提取和估计效果的方法用于荟萃分析,可能是导致结果分歧的另一个原因。PRO/AA补充剂(当与抗阻运动训练结合使用时)对促进全身瘦质量增长产生了积极的影响,尽管影响很小,但对肌肉质量、肌肉力量或功能能力的影响很小且不一致。在肥胖和超重参与者比例较高的研究中,缺乏效果是扭曲的,而在那些含有肌肉减少和虚弱的老年人的研究中,效果不那么明显,这些老年人最需要干预来增加肌肉质量。鼓励研究人员按组提供所有结果的变化分数、平均值和标准偏差,甚至使数据集可用,以改进未来的元分析和推进该领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of ingested amino acids/protein in the promotion of resistance exercise-training adaptations in aging: Analysis of meta-analyses
A current lack of consensus exists regarding the effect of protein supplementation during resistance exercise in aging adult on the phenotypic adaptation. Thus, we critically assessed the collection of meta-analytic evidence to provide clarity regarding the differences between meta-analyses examining the combined effectiveness of chronic exposure to PRO/AA supplementation and resistance exercise to enhance the adaptive response. Thirteen meta-analyses, with relatively similar titles, presented different results on the topic. This divergence is mainly due to an inconsistent study selection process resulting in distinct study populations and varied types of protein-focused nutritional interventions and not RCT study quality. The methods applied to extract and estimate effects from RCTs with incorrectly formatted data for meta-analyses likely provide an additional reason for divergent results. PRO/AA supplements (when combined with resistance exercise training) produced a positive, albeit minor effect on the promotion of whole-body lean mass growth, yet a minimal and inconsistent effect on muscle mass, muscle strength, or functional capacity. The lack of an effect was skewed in studies with a higher proportion of obese and overweight participants and somewhat less noticeable in those containing sarcopenic and frail older adults, who would have the greatest need for an intervention to enhance muscle mass. Researchers are encouraged to provide the change scores mean and standard deviations for all their outcomes by group or even making the data sets available to improve future meta-analyses and advance the field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition and Healthy Aging
Nutrition and Healthy Aging Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Nutrition and Healthy Aging is an international forum for research on nutrition as a means of promoting healthy aging. It is particularly concerned with the impact of nutritional interventions on the metabolic and molecular mechanisms which modulate aging and age-associated diseases, including both biological responses on the part of the organism itself and its micro biome. Results emanating from both model organisms and clinical trials will be considered. With regards to the latter, the journal will be rigorous in only accepting for publication well controlled, randomized human intervention trials that conform broadly with the current EFSA and US FDA guidelines for nutritional clinical studies. The journal will publish research articles, short communications, critical reviews and conference summaries, whilst open peer commentaries will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信