现代亚美尼亚:民族复兴与失败的复兴

IF 0.2 Q4 AREA STUDIES
A. Ferrari
{"title":"现代亚美尼亚:民族复兴与失败的复兴","authors":"A. Ferrari","doi":"10.13128/SIJIS-2239-3978-23314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the beginning of the 18th century up to the 1915 genocide, Armenian culture underwent a complex, intensive modernization process of a very ancient identity, strongly underpinned by Christianity. After centuries under Islamic domination, this process developed in the shape of a well-organized convergence with Europe as a primarily cultural, but also political model. “Rebirth” ( veracnund ) and “Awakening” ( zart’onk’ ) are the traditional keywords in a modernization process begun in the 18th century by the Christian humanism of the Mekhitarist Catholic Monastic Order in Venice and the “eccentric” enlightenment of the Indian colonies, continuing in the nineteenth and early 20th centuries by means of wide-ranging polycentric activity, which led to significant progress in the cultural field. However, this process could not evolve politically, mostly owing to an international situation that was opposed to Armenian national aspirations. Instead of a “Risorgimento” the Armenian people, during the 20th century, experienced the tragedy of genocide and the suffering of a diaspora, especially in the earlier stages. This negative situation was only partially softened by the setting up of a small independent republic in 1918, initially under a soviet type regime and now in a state of precarious independence.","PeriodicalId":40876,"journal":{"name":"Studi irlandesi-A Journal of Irish Studies","volume":"8 1","pages":"69-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"L’Armenia moderna:rinascita nazionale e risorgimento mancato\",\"authors\":\"A. Ferrari\",\"doi\":\"10.13128/SIJIS-2239-3978-23314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From the beginning of the 18th century up to the 1915 genocide, Armenian culture underwent a complex, intensive modernization process of a very ancient identity, strongly underpinned by Christianity. After centuries under Islamic domination, this process developed in the shape of a well-organized convergence with Europe as a primarily cultural, but also political model. “Rebirth” ( veracnund ) and “Awakening” ( zart’onk’ ) are the traditional keywords in a modernization process begun in the 18th century by the Christian humanism of the Mekhitarist Catholic Monastic Order in Venice and the “eccentric” enlightenment of the Indian colonies, continuing in the nineteenth and early 20th centuries by means of wide-ranging polycentric activity, which led to significant progress in the cultural field. However, this process could not evolve politically, mostly owing to an international situation that was opposed to Armenian national aspirations. Instead of a “Risorgimento” the Armenian people, during the 20th century, experienced the tragedy of genocide and the suffering of a diaspora, especially in the earlier stages. This negative situation was only partially softened by the setting up of a small independent republic in 1918, initially under a soviet type regime and now in a state of precarious independence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studi irlandesi-A Journal of Irish Studies\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"69-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studi irlandesi-A Journal of Irish Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13128/SIJIS-2239-3978-23314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studi irlandesi-A Journal of Irish Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13128/SIJIS-2239-3978-23314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

从18世纪初到1915年的种族灭绝,亚美尼亚文化经历了一个复杂而密集的现代化过程,具有非常古老的身份,并得到了基督教的有力支持。在伊斯兰统治下的几个世纪后,这一进程发展成为一种组织良好的融合,欧洲主要是一种文化模式,但也是一种政治模式。“重生”(veracund)和“觉醒”(zart'onk',这导致了文化领域的重大进步。然而,这一进程在政治上无法发展,主要是由于国际局势与亚美尼亚的民族愿望背道而驰。20世纪,亚美尼亚人民经历了种族灭绝的悲剧和散居国外的人的痛苦,尤其是在早期阶段,而不是“狂欢节”。1918年建立了一个小型独立共和国,最初处于苏联式政权之下,现在处于岌岌可危的独立状态,这一消极局面只得到了部分缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
L’Armenia moderna:rinascita nazionale e risorgimento mancato
From the beginning of the 18th century up to the 1915 genocide, Armenian culture underwent a complex, intensive modernization process of a very ancient identity, strongly underpinned by Christianity. After centuries under Islamic domination, this process developed in the shape of a well-organized convergence with Europe as a primarily cultural, but also political model. “Rebirth” ( veracnund ) and “Awakening” ( zart’onk’ ) are the traditional keywords in a modernization process begun in the 18th century by the Christian humanism of the Mekhitarist Catholic Monastic Order in Venice and the “eccentric” enlightenment of the Indian colonies, continuing in the nineteenth and early 20th centuries by means of wide-ranging polycentric activity, which led to significant progress in the cultural field. However, this process could not evolve politically, mostly owing to an international situation that was opposed to Armenian national aspirations. Instead of a “Risorgimento” the Armenian people, during the 20th century, experienced the tragedy of genocide and the suffering of a diaspora, especially in the earlier stages. This negative situation was only partially softened by the setting up of a small independent republic in 1918, initially under a soviet type regime and now in a state of precarious independence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信