{"title":"民族主义的双重困境:个人主义与弥尔顿民族主义的全球意蕴","authors":"P. Stevens","doi":"10.5325/MILTONSTUDIES.63.1.0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This essay argues that the emergence of the modern nation-state in the seventeenth century paradoxically produced or made possible the kind of individualism or sense of self, specifically the confidence in individual agency and human rights, on which globalism now seems to rest secure. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the work of Milton, a claim the article tries to illustrate with a comparison of the Treatise of Civil Power with The Readie and Easie Way.","PeriodicalId":42710,"journal":{"name":"Milton Studies","volume":"63 1","pages":"41 - 61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nationalism's Double-Bind: Individualism and the Global Implications of Milton's Nationalism\",\"authors\":\"P. Stevens\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/MILTONSTUDIES.63.1.0041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:This essay argues that the emergence of the modern nation-state in the seventeenth century paradoxically produced or made possible the kind of individualism or sense of self, specifically the confidence in individual agency and human rights, on which globalism now seems to rest secure. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the work of Milton, a claim the article tries to illustrate with a comparison of the Treatise of Civil Power with The Readie and Easie Way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Milton Studies\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"41 - 61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Milton Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/MILTONSTUDIES.63.1.0041\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Milton Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/MILTONSTUDIES.63.1.0041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Nationalism's Double-Bind: Individualism and the Global Implications of Milton's Nationalism
abstract:This essay argues that the emergence of the modern nation-state in the seventeenth century paradoxically produced or made possible the kind of individualism or sense of self, specifically the confidence in individual agency and human rights, on which globalism now seems to rest secure. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the work of Milton, a claim the article tries to illustrate with a comparison of the Treatise of Civil Power with The Readie and Easie Way.