民族主义的双重困境:个人主义与弥尔顿民族主义的全球意蕴

IF 0.1 2区 文学 0 POETRY
P. Stevens
{"title":"民族主义的双重困境:个人主义与弥尔顿民族主义的全球意蕴","authors":"P. Stevens","doi":"10.5325/MILTONSTUDIES.63.1.0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This essay argues that the emergence of the modern nation-state in the seventeenth century paradoxically produced or made possible the kind of individualism or sense of self, specifically the confidence in individual agency and human rights, on which globalism now seems to rest secure. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the work of Milton, a claim the article tries to illustrate with a comparison of the Treatise of Civil Power with The Readie and Easie Way.","PeriodicalId":42710,"journal":{"name":"Milton Studies","volume":"63 1","pages":"41 - 61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nationalism's Double-Bind: Individualism and the Global Implications of Milton's Nationalism\",\"authors\":\"P. Stevens\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/MILTONSTUDIES.63.1.0041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:This essay argues that the emergence of the modern nation-state in the seventeenth century paradoxically produced or made possible the kind of individualism or sense of self, specifically the confidence in individual agency and human rights, on which globalism now seems to rest secure. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the work of Milton, a claim the article tries to illustrate with a comparison of the Treatise of Civil Power with The Readie and Easie Way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Milton Studies\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"41 - 61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Milton Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/MILTONSTUDIES.63.1.0041\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Milton Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/MILTONSTUDIES.63.1.0041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本文认为,17世纪现代民族国家的出现矛盾地产生或使个人主义或自我意识成为可能,特别是对个人能动性和人权的信心,而全球主义现在似乎是建立在这种信心之上的。这一点在米尔顿的作品中最为明显,文章试图通过将《公民权力论》与《阅读》和《简易方法》进行比较来说明这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nationalism's Double-Bind: Individualism and the Global Implications of Milton's Nationalism
abstract:This essay argues that the emergence of the modern nation-state in the seventeenth century paradoxically produced or made possible the kind of individualism or sense of self, specifically the confidence in individual agency and human rights, on which globalism now seems to rest secure. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the work of Milton, a claim the article tries to illustrate with a comparison of the Treatise of Civil Power with The Readie and Easie Way.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Milton Studies
Milton Studies POETRY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Milton Studies is published annually by the University of Pittsburgh Press as a forum for Milton scholarship and criticism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信