非线性潮涌相互作用对卫星雷达高度计潮汐的影响

IF 2 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
H. Guarneri, M. Verlaan, D. C. Slobbe, J. Veenstra, F. Zijl, J. Pietrzak, M. Snellen, L. Keyzer, Y. Afrasteh, R. Klees
{"title":"非线性潮涌相互作用对卫星雷达高度计潮汐的影响","authors":"H. Guarneri, M. Verlaan, D. C. Slobbe, J. Veenstra, F. Zijl, J. Pietrzak, M. Snellen, L. Keyzer, Y. Afrasteh, R. Klees","doi":"10.1080/01490419.2023.2175084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Both empirical and assimilative global ocean tidal models are significantly more accurate in the deep ocean than in shelf and coastal waters. In this study, we answered whether this is due to the quality of the models used to reduce tide and surge or the general approach to treat tide and surge as two separate components of the water level obtained from stand-alone models, which ignores the nonlinear tide–surge interaction. In doing so, we used tide gauge observations as partially synthetic altimeter time series, tide–surge water-level time series obtained with the 2D Dutch Continental Shelf Model – Flexible Mesh (DCSM), and tide and surge water-level time series obtained using the DCSM, FES2014 (FES) and the Dynamic Atmospheric Correction (DAC) product. Expressed in the root-sum-square (RSS) of the eight main tidal constituents, we obtained a reduction % when removing the DCSM tide–surge water levels compared to when we removed the sum of the DCSM tide and DCSM surge water levels. The RSS obtained in the latter case was only 3.3% lower than with FES and DAC. We conclude that the lower tidal estimates accuracy in shelf-coastal waters derives from the missing nonlinear tide–surge interactions.","PeriodicalId":49884,"journal":{"name":"Marine Geodesy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of nonlinear tide–surge interaction on satellite radar altimeter-derived tides\",\"authors\":\"H. Guarneri, M. Verlaan, D. C. Slobbe, J. Veenstra, F. Zijl, J. Pietrzak, M. Snellen, L. Keyzer, Y. Afrasteh, R. Klees\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01490419.2023.2175084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Both empirical and assimilative global ocean tidal models are significantly more accurate in the deep ocean than in shelf and coastal waters. In this study, we answered whether this is due to the quality of the models used to reduce tide and surge or the general approach to treat tide and surge as two separate components of the water level obtained from stand-alone models, which ignores the nonlinear tide–surge interaction. In doing so, we used tide gauge observations as partially synthetic altimeter time series, tide–surge water-level time series obtained with the 2D Dutch Continental Shelf Model – Flexible Mesh (DCSM), and tide and surge water-level time series obtained using the DCSM, FES2014 (FES) and the Dynamic Atmospheric Correction (DAC) product. Expressed in the root-sum-square (RSS) of the eight main tidal constituents, we obtained a reduction % when removing the DCSM tide–surge water levels compared to when we removed the sum of the DCSM tide and DCSM surge water levels. The RSS obtained in the latter case was only 3.3% lower than with FES and DAC. We conclude that the lower tidal estimates accuracy in shelf-coastal waters derives from the missing nonlinear tide–surge interactions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Geodesy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Geodesy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01490419.2023.2175084\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01490419.2023.2175084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要经验和同化全球海洋潮汐模型在深海中都比在陆架和沿海水域中准确得多。在这项研究中,我们回答了这是由于用于减少潮汐和涌浪的模型的质量,还是将潮汐和涌潮视为从独立模型中获得的水位的两个独立分量的一般方法,忽略了非线性潮汐-涌浪相互作用。在这样做的过程中,我们使用潮汐计观测作为部分合成的高度计时间序列,使用2D荷兰大陆架模型-柔性网格(DCSM)获得的潮汐-涌浪水位时间序列,以及使用DCSM、FES2014(FES)和动态大气校正(DAC)产品获得的潮汐和涌浪水位序列。用八种主要潮汐成分的平方根(RSS)表示,与去除DCSM潮汐和DCSM涌浪水位之和时相比,去除DCSM涌潮水位时,我们获得了%的减少。后一种情况下获得的RSS仅比FES和DAC低3.3%。我们得出的结论是,陆架沿岸水域较低的潮汐估计精度源于缺失的非线性潮汐-涌浪相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of nonlinear tide–surge interaction on satellite radar altimeter-derived tides
Abstract Both empirical and assimilative global ocean tidal models are significantly more accurate in the deep ocean than in shelf and coastal waters. In this study, we answered whether this is due to the quality of the models used to reduce tide and surge or the general approach to treat tide and surge as two separate components of the water level obtained from stand-alone models, which ignores the nonlinear tide–surge interaction. In doing so, we used tide gauge observations as partially synthetic altimeter time series, tide–surge water-level time series obtained with the 2D Dutch Continental Shelf Model – Flexible Mesh (DCSM), and tide and surge water-level time series obtained using the DCSM, FES2014 (FES) and the Dynamic Atmospheric Correction (DAC) product. Expressed in the root-sum-square (RSS) of the eight main tidal constituents, we obtained a reduction % when removing the DCSM tide–surge water levels compared to when we removed the sum of the DCSM tide and DCSM surge water levels. The RSS obtained in the latter case was only 3.3% lower than with FES and DAC. We conclude that the lower tidal estimates accuracy in shelf-coastal waters derives from the missing nonlinear tide–surge interactions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Marine Geodesy
Marine Geodesy 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Marine Geodesy is to stimulate progress in ocean surveys, mapping, and remote sensing by promoting problem-oriented research in the marine and coastal environment. The journal will consider articles on the following topics: topography and mapping; satellite altimetry; bathymetry; positioning; precise navigation; boundary demarcation and determination; tsunamis; plate/tectonics; geoid determination; hydrographic and oceanographic observations; acoustics and space instrumentation; ground truth; system calibration and validation; geographic information systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信