二十世纪初俄罗斯保守派思想和实践中的工人问题

I. Omel’ianchuk
{"title":"二十世纪初俄罗斯保守派思想和实践中的工人问题","authors":"I. Omel’ianchuk","doi":"10.1080/10611983.2021.1916321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The views of Russian conservatives on the worker question and their attempts to resolve it have, to all intents and purposes, never been adequately covered by historians in this country. The writings of prerevolutionary historians on the rightist movement were frankly journalistic in nature, with the possible exception of works by D. Kol’tsov, V.O. Levitskii, N. Lukin, and P. Timofeev, which as contemporary scholar Dmitrii Viacheslavovich Karpukhin has observed, do show that members of the working class were involved in Black Hundred unions and organizations and also examine the ideological orientations of those institutions, focused as they were on drawing members of the proletariat into the ranks of the Black Hundreds. But the authors mentioned here also emphasized that the conservatives’ successes in that arena owed much to demagoguery, which targeted the benighted, undeveloped strata of the working population and the lumpen proletariat. By virtue of the ideological dogmas that weighed on them, Soviet historians all but ignored the problem of the workers’ involvement in the monarchist (Black Hundred) movement. Scholars in that period did, admittedly, look at the attempts of extreme rightists to bring the workers over to their side, but with the sole aim of proving their futility. Only Sergei Aleksandrovich Stepanov, in his study of the social composition of the Black Hundred unions and organizations, noted how active the proletariat was in them. The monarchists’ political practice on the worker question has been alluded to by contemporary Russian historians Sergei Stepanov and Andrei Mikhailovich Belov, while Aleksandr Vital’evich Repnikov has touched on their ideological constructs. Those constructs, however, have more often than not been viewed through the prism of Lev Aleksandrovich Tikhomirov’s theoretical and ideological legacy. But despite the evident","PeriodicalId":89267,"journal":{"name":"Russian studies in history","volume":"59 1","pages":"100 - 123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Worker Question in the Ideology and Practice of Early Twentieth-Century Russian Conservatives\",\"authors\":\"I. Omel’ianchuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10611983.2021.1916321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The views of Russian conservatives on the worker question and their attempts to resolve it have, to all intents and purposes, never been adequately covered by historians in this country. The writings of prerevolutionary historians on the rightist movement were frankly journalistic in nature, with the possible exception of works by D. Kol’tsov, V.O. Levitskii, N. Lukin, and P. Timofeev, which as contemporary scholar Dmitrii Viacheslavovich Karpukhin has observed, do show that members of the working class were involved in Black Hundred unions and organizations and also examine the ideological orientations of those institutions, focused as they were on drawing members of the proletariat into the ranks of the Black Hundreds. But the authors mentioned here also emphasized that the conservatives’ successes in that arena owed much to demagoguery, which targeted the benighted, undeveloped strata of the working population and the lumpen proletariat. By virtue of the ideological dogmas that weighed on them, Soviet historians all but ignored the problem of the workers’ involvement in the monarchist (Black Hundred) movement. Scholars in that period did, admittedly, look at the attempts of extreme rightists to bring the workers over to their side, but with the sole aim of proving their futility. Only Sergei Aleksandrovich Stepanov, in his study of the social composition of the Black Hundred unions and organizations, noted how active the proletariat was in them. The monarchists’ political practice on the worker question has been alluded to by contemporary Russian historians Sergei Stepanov and Andrei Mikhailovich Belov, while Aleksandr Vital’evich Repnikov has touched on their ideological constructs. Those constructs, however, have more often than not been viewed through the prism of Lev Aleksandrovich Tikhomirov’s theoretical and ideological legacy. But despite the evident\",\"PeriodicalId\":89267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian studies in history\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"100 - 123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian studies in history\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2021.1916321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian studies in history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2021.1916321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

俄罗斯保守派对工人问题的看法以及他们解决工人问题的努力,在所有意图和目的上,从未被这个国家的历史学家充分报道过。进化前历史学家关于右派运动的著作坦率地说是新闻性质的,但D.Kol’tsov、V.O.Levitskii、N.Lukin和P.Timofeev的作品可能除外,正如当代学者Dmitrii Viacheslavich Karpukhin所观察到的,确实表明工人阶级成员参与了黑人百人会和组织,并研究了这些机构的意识形态取向,因为它们专注于将无产阶级成员拉入黑人百人会的行列。但这里提到的作者也强调,保守派在这一领域的成功在很大程度上归功于煽动,这些煽动针对的是愚昧、未发展的劳动人口阶层和流氓无产阶级。由于意识形态教条的影响,苏联历史学家几乎忽略了工人参与君主主义(黑人百人)运动的问题。无可否认,那个时期的学者确实观察了极右分子试图将工人带到他们身边的行为,但唯一的目的是证明他们的徒劳。只有Sergei Aleksandrovich Stepanov在研究黑人百人会和组织的社会组成时注意到无产阶级在其中是多么活跃。当代俄罗斯历史学家谢尔盖·斯捷潘诺夫(Sergei Stepanov)和安德烈·米哈伊洛维奇·贝洛夫(Andrei Mikhailovich Belov)提到了君主主义者在工人问题上的政治实践,而亚历山大·维塔尔耶维奇·雷普尼科夫(Aleksandr Vital'evich Repnikov)则谈到了他们的意识形态结构。然而,这些结构往往是通过列夫·亚历山德罗维奇·季霍米罗夫的理论和意识形态遗产来看待的。尽管如此
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Worker Question in the Ideology and Practice of Early Twentieth-Century Russian Conservatives
The views of Russian conservatives on the worker question and their attempts to resolve it have, to all intents and purposes, never been adequately covered by historians in this country. The writings of prerevolutionary historians on the rightist movement were frankly journalistic in nature, with the possible exception of works by D. Kol’tsov, V.O. Levitskii, N. Lukin, and P. Timofeev, which as contemporary scholar Dmitrii Viacheslavovich Karpukhin has observed, do show that members of the working class were involved in Black Hundred unions and organizations and also examine the ideological orientations of those institutions, focused as they were on drawing members of the proletariat into the ranks of the Black Hundreds. But the authors mentioned here also emphasized that the conservatives’ successes in that arena owed much to demagoguery, which targeted the benighted, undeveloped strata of the working population and the lumpen proletariat. By virtue of the ideological dogmas that weighed on them, Soviet historians all but ignored the problem of the workers’ involvement in the monarchist (Black Hundred) movement. Scholars in that period did, admittedly, look at the attempts of extreme rightists to bring the workers over to their side, but with the sole aim of proving their futility. Only Sergei Aleksandrovich Stepanov, in his study of the social composition of the Black Hundred unions and organizations, noted how active the proletariat was in them. The monarchists’ political practice on the worker question has been alluded to by contemporary Russian historians Sergei Stepanov and Andrei Mikhailovich Belov, while Aleksandr Vital’evich Repnikov has touched on their ideological constructs. Those constructs, however, have more often than not been viewed through the prism of Lev Aleksandrovich Tikhomirov’s theoretical and ideological legacy. But despite the evident
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信