提升学校领导力——赋能结构和过程:汤森/亚当斯方法的七种力量

Q4 Social Sciences
W. Boyd
{"title":"提升学校领导力——赋能结构和过程:汤森/亚当斯方法的七种力量","authors":"W. Boyd","doi":"10.11575/AJER.V67I3.69959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reviews the work of two Albertan educators, David Townsend and Pam Adams, in their application of collaborative inquiry to improving school leadership. Collaborative inquiry is essentially a professional practice that has yet not been comprehensively theorized. This article seeks to lay some foundations for a theorization of the practice by identifying structures and processes that appear to underlie the remarkable success of applications of the practice in several school districts in Alberta, Canada. The emerging mode is one that envisages seven powers: the power of teams, the power of relationship, the power of the process, the power of inquiry and reflection, the power of collaboration, the power of modelling, and the power of narrative. These powers appear to underpin much of what has been written about the ways in which collaborative inquiry has become a powerful force for leadership development in Alberta, and more recently in the State of New South Wales in Australia.\nKeywords: Collaborative inquiry, school leadership, enabling structures\nCet article examine le travail de deux educateurs albertains, David Townsend et Pam Adams, dans leur application de l'enquete collaborative pour ameliorer le leadership scolaire. L'enquete collaborative est essentiellement une pratique professionnelle qui n'a pas encore ete theorisee de maniere exhaustive. Cet article cherche a jeter les bases d'une theorisation de la pratique en identifiant les structures et les processus qui semblent sous-tendre le succes remarquable des applications de la pratique dans plusieurs districts scolaires de l'Alberta, au Canada. Le mode emergent est celui qui envisage sept pouvoirs : le pouvoir des equipes, le pouvoir des relations, le pouvoir du processus, le pouvoir de l'enquete et de la reflexion, le pouvoir de la collaboration, le pouvoir de la modelisation et le pouvoir du recit. Ces pouvoirs semblent sous-tendre une grande partie de ce qui a ete ecrit sur la maniere dont l'enquete collaborative est devenue une force puissante pour le developpement du leadership en Alberta, et plus recemment dans l'Etat de Nouvelle-Galles du Sud en Australie.\nMots cles : enquete collaborative, leadership scolaire, structures habilitantes","PeriodicalId":35607,"journal":{"name":"Alberta Journal of Educational Research","volume":"67 1","pages":"312-320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uplifting School Leadership—Enabling Structures and Processes: The Seven Powers of the Townsend/Adams Approach\",\"authors\":\"W. Boyd\",\"doi\":\"10.11575/AJER.V67I3.69959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article reviews the work of two Albertan educators, David Townsend and Pam Adams, in their application of collaborative inquiry to improving school leadership. Collaborative inquiry is essentially a professional practice that has yet not been comprehensively theorized. This article seeks to lay some foundations for a theorization of the practice by identifying structures and processes that appear to underlie the remarkable success of applications of the practice in several school districts in Alberta, Canada. The emerging mode is one that envisages seven powers: the power of teams, the power of relationship, the power of the process, the power of inquiry and reflection, the power of collaboration, the power of modelling, and the power of narrative. These powers appear to underpin much of what has been written about the ways in which collaborative inquiry has become a powerful force for leadership development in Alberta, and more recently in the State of New South Wales in Australia.\\nKeywords: Collaborative inquiry, school leadership, enabling structures\\nCet article examine le travail de deux educateurs albertains, David Townsend et Pam Adams, dans leur application de l'enquete collaborative pour ameliorer le leadership scolaire. L'enquete collaborative est essentiellement une pratique professionnelle qui n'a pas encore ete theorisee de maniere exhaustive. Cet article cherche a jeter les bases d'une theorisation de la pratique en identifiant les structures et les processus qui semblent sous-tendre le succes remarquable des applications de la pratique dans plusieurs districts scolaires de l'Alberta, au Canada. Le mode emergent est celui qui envisage sept pouvoirs : le pouvoir des equipes, le pouvoir des relations, le pouvoir du processus, le pouvoir de l'enquete et de la reflexion, le pouvoir de la collaboration, le pouvoir de la modelisation et le pouvoir du recit. Ces pouvoirs semblent sous-tendre une grande partie de ce qui a ete ecrit sur la maniere dont l'enquete collaborative est devenue une force puissante pour le developpement du leadership en Alberta, et plus recemment dans l'Etat de Nouvelle-Galles du Sud en Australie.\\nMots cles : enquete collaborative, leadership scolaire, structures habilitantes\",\"PeriodicalId\":35607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alberta Journal of Educational Research\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"312-320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alberta Journal of Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11575/AJER.V67I3.69959\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alberta Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11575/AJER.V67I3.69959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文回顾了两位阿尔伯塔省的教育家,大卫·汤森和帕姆·亚当斯的工作,在他们的合作调查的应用,以提高学校的领导。协作探究本质上是一种尚未被全面理论化的专业实践。本文试图通过确定结构和过程,为实践的理论化奠定一些基础,这些结构和过程似乎是加拿大阿尔伯塔省几个学区实践应用取得显著成功的基础。新兴模式是一种设想七种力量的模式:团队的力量、关系的力量、过程的力量、探究和反思的力量、合作的力量、建模的力量和叙述的力量。在阿尔伯塔省,以及最近在澳大利亚的新南威尔士州,协作探究已经成为领导力发展的强大力量,这些力量似乎支撑了很多已经写过的内容。关键词:合作探究,学校领导,使能结构。本文考察了双重教育工作者的劳动,大卫·汤森和帕姆·亚当斯,以及在领导研究中对合作探究的应用。“协作是一种必要的要素,一种实践的专业,一种实践的理论,一种实践的详尽。”这篇文章是在加拿大阿尔伯塔省和其他地区的学者的基础上,在相同的结构和过程中,在实践的理论基础和实践的基础上取得的成功。“新兴模式”是一种新的设想:“设备模式”、“关系模式”、“过程模式”、“调查模式”、“反思模式”、“合作模式”、“建模模式模式”和“分析模式”。这两个国家组成了一个大政党,组成了一个大政党,组成了一个大政党,组成了一个大政党,组成了一个大政党,组成了一个大政党,组成了一个大政党,组成了一个大政党,组成了一个大政党,组成了一个大政党,组成了一个大政党,组成了一个大政党,组成了一个大政党。主要内容:团队合作、领导协作、结构适应
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uplifting School Leadership—Enabling Structures and Processes: The Seven Powers of the Townsend/Adams Approach
This article reviews the work of two Albertan educators, David Townsend and Pam Adams, in their application of collaborative inquiry to improving school leadership. Collaborative inquiry is essentially a professional practice that has yet not been comprehensively theorized. This article seeks to lay some foundations for a theorization of the practice by identifying structures and processes that appear to underlie the remarkable success of applications of the practice in several school districts in Alberta, Canada. The emerging mode is one that envisages seven powers: the power of teams, the power of relationship, the power of the process, the power of inquiry and reflection, the power of collaboration, the power of modelling, and the power of narrative. These powers appear to underpin much of what has been written about the ways in which collaborative inquiry has become a powerful force for leadership development in Alberta, and more recently in the State of New South Wales in Australia. Keywords: Collaborative inquiry, school leadership, enabling structures Cet article examine le travail de deux educateurs albertains, David Townsend et Pam Adams, dans leur application de l'enquete collaborative pour ameliorer le leadership scolaire. L'enquete collaborative est essentiellement une pratique professionnelle qui n'a pas encore ete theorisee de maniere exhaustive. Cet article cherche a jeter les bases d'une theorisation de la pratique en identifiant les structures et les processus qui semblent sous-tendre le succes remarquable des applications de la pratique dans plusieurs districts scolaires de l'Alberta, au Canada. Le mode emergent est celui qui envisage sept pouvoirs : le pouvoir des equipes, le pouvoir des relations, le pouvoir du processus, le pouvoir de l'enquete et de la reflexion, le pouvoir de la collaboration, le pouvoir de la modelisation et le pouvoir du recit. Ces pouvoirs semblent sous-tendre une grande partie de ce qui a ete ecrit sur la maniere dont l'enquete collaborative est devenue une force puissante pour le developpement du leadership en Alberta, et plus recemment dans l'Etat de Nouvelle-Galles du Sud en Australie. Mots cles : enquete collaborative, leadership scolaire, structures habilitantes
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alberta Journal of Educational Research
Alberta Journal of Educational Research Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Alberta Journal of Educational Research is a quarterly journal devoted to the dissemination, criticism, interpretation, and encouragement of all forms of systematic inquiry into education and fields related to or associated with education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信