非国际财务报告准则与会计机构的变化——诺基亚的教训

IF 1.7 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
A. Rautiainen, M. Järvenpää, Toni Mättö
{"title":"非国际财务报告准则与会计机构的变化——诺基亚的教训","authors":"A. Rautiainen, M. Järvenpää, Toni Mättö","doi":"10.1177/10323732221094033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyse the lessons learned from Nokia to illustrate the changing focus in accounting and organisational practices that affect the perceptions of relevant accounting work and the key measures of success. In the course of an analysis covering 25 years, the introduction of management accounting innovations was first emphasised regarding managerial relevance but were later replaced by financial accounting emphasis and innovations (e.g. non-IFRS reporting). Our data includes public reports, newspaper articles and 21 interviews made between 1996 and 2019. We present a framework for analysing shifts in the focus of accounting. Our case analysis on changing accounting practices, on shifting perceptions of relevance and reliability, and on primary measures of success, contributes to understanding the focus of key accounting measures in historical developments regarding perceived success or failure, and in changing institutional practices in terms of ‘institutional work’, especially through valourizing either the actions or valourizing reports.","PeriodicalId":45774,"journal":{"name":"Accounting History","volume":"27 1","pages":"524 - 548"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-IFRS and changes in accounting institutions – Lessons from Nokia\",\"authors\":\"A. Rautiainen, M. Järvenpää, Toni Mättö\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10323732221094033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We analyse the lessons learned from Nokia to illustrate the changing focus in accounting and organisational practices that affect the perceptions of relevant accounting work and the key measures of success. In the course of an analysis covering 25 years, the introduction of management accounting innovations was first emphasised regarding managerial relevance but were later replaced by financial accounting emphasis and innovations (e.g. non-IFRS reporting). Our data includes public reports, newspaper articles and 21 interviews made between 1996 and 2019. We present a framework for analysing shifts in the focus of accounting. Our case analysis on changing accounting practices, on shifting perceptions of relevance and reliability, and on primary measures of success, contributes to understanding the focus of key accounting measures in historical developments regarding perceived success or failure, and in changing institutional practices in terms of ‘institutional work’, especially through valourizing either the actions or valourizing reports.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting History\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"524 - 548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10323732221094033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10323732221094033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

我们分析了从诺基亚获得的经验教训,以说明会计和组织实践中不断变化的重点,这些重点影响了对相关会计工作和成功关键指标的看法。在长达25年的分析过程中,管理会计创新的引入首先强调了管理相关性,但后来被财务会计的重点和创新(例如非国际财务报告准则报告)所取代。我们的数据包括1996年至2019年间的公开报道、报纸文章和21次采访。我们提出了一个分析会计重心转移的框架。我们对不断变化的会计实践、对相关性和可靠性观念的转变以及成功的主要衡量标准的案例分析,有助于理解历史发展中关于感知成功或失败的关键会计措施的重点,以及在“制度工作”方面改变制度实践的重点,特别是通过评估行动或评估报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-IFRS and changes in accounting institutions – Lessons from Nokia
We analyse the lessons learned from Nokia to illustrate the changing focus in accounting and organisational practices that affect the perceptions of relevant accounting work and the key measures of success. In the course of an analysis covering 25 years, the introduction of management accounting innovations was first emphasised regarding managerial relevance but were later replaced by financial accounting emphasis and innovations (e.g. non-IFRS reporting). Our data includes public reports, newspaper articles and 21 interviews made between 1996 and 2019. We present a framework for analysing shifts in the focus of accounting. Our case analysis on changing accounting practices, on shifting perceptions of relevance and reliability, and on primary measures of success, contributes to understanding the focus of key accounting measures in historical developments regarding perceived success or failure, and in changing institutional practices in terms of ‘institutional work’, especially through valourizing either the actions or valourizing reports.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting History
Accounting History BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Accounting History is an international peer reviewed journal that aims to publish high quality historical papers. These could be concerned with exploring the advent and development of accounting bodies, conventions, ideas, practices and rules. They should attempt to identify the individuals and also the local, time-specific environmental factors which affected accounting, and should endeavour to assess accounting"s impact on organisational and social functioning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信