每一页,每一行,每一封信:福音派和圣经从18世纪30年代到现在

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
M. Wellings
{"title":"每一页,每一行,每一封信:福音派和圣经从18世纪30年代到现在","authors":"M. Wellings","doi":"10.5325/weslmethstud.15.2.0216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"cites a number of divines from the Mother Country who made such arguments. Steward does admit, though, that most Church of England ministers supported passive obedience in all cases whatsoever, whereas most of Britain’s dissenting clergy backed the colonists. Although the author states that liberal as well as orthodox dissenters supported the American cause, he does not adequately explain this dichotomy. Gary Steward’s Justifying Revolution joins a growing number of insightful monographs by scholars such as Daniel Dreisbach and Mark David Hall, which not only articulate the deeper historical and biblical roots of American resistance, but which also argue for the centrality of religion during the nation’s founding era. Steward’s prose is clear and accessible, although this writer thinks he tended to overquote his sources when he could have cited them in his own words. The research notes are thorough and provide several interesting insights into his evidence and argument. In sum, Justifying Revolution is a deeply researched volume that specialists in the American Revolution will find well worth reading.","PeriodicalId":40236,"journal":{"name":"Wesley and Methodist Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Every Leaf, Line, and Letter: Evangelicals and the Bible from the 1730s to the Present\",\"authors\":\"M. Wellings\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/weslmethstud.15.2.0216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"cites a number of divines from the Mother Country who made such arguments. Steward does admit, though, that most Church of England ministers supported passive obedience in all cases whatsoever, whereas most of Britain’s dissenting clergy backed the colonists. Although the author states that liberal as well as orthodox dissenters supported the American cause, he does not adequately explain this dichotomy. Gary Steward’s Justifying Revolution joins a growing number of insightful monographs by scholars such as Daniel Dreisbach and Mark David Hall, which not only articulate the deeper historical and biblical roots of American resistance, but which also argue for the centrality of religion during the nation’s founding era. Steward’s prose is clear and accessible, although this writer thinks he tended to overquote his sources when he could have cited them in his own words. The research notes are thorough and provide several interesting insights into his evidence and argument. In sum, Justifying Revolution is a deeply researched volume that specialists in the American Revolution will find well worth reading.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wesley and Methodist Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wesley and Methodist Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/weslmethstud.15.2.0216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wesley and Methodist Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/weslmethstud.15.2.0216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

引用了一些母国的神学家,他们提出了这样的论点。斯图尔德确实承认,大多数英格兰国教会的牧师在任何情况下都支持被动服从,而英国大多数持不同意见的神职人员都支持殖民者。虽然作者说自由派和正统的反对者都支持美国的事业,但他没有充分解释这种二分法。加里·斯图尔德的《为革命辩护》是丹尼尔·德雷斯巴赫和马克·大卫·霍尔等学者撰写的越来越多的见解深刻的专著之一,这些专著不仅阐明了美国抵抗运动更深层次的历史和圣经根源,而且还论证了宗教在美国建国时期的中心地位。斯图尔德的文笔清晰易懂,尽管笔者认为他在本可以用自己的话引用的时候,往往会过度引用他的资料。研究笔记是全面的,并提供了一些有趣的见解,他的证据和论点。总之,《为革命辩护》是一本研究深入的书,研究美国革命的专家会发现这本书非常值得一读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Every Leaf, Line, and Letter: Evangelicals and the Bible from the 1730s to the Present
cites a number of divines from the Mother Country who made such arguments. Steward does admit, though, that most Church of England ministers supported passive obedience in all cases whatsoever, whereas most of Britain’s dissenting clergy backed the colonists. Although the author states that liberal as well as orthodox dissenters supported the American cause, he does not adequately explain this dichotomy. Gary Steward’s Justifying Revolution joins a growing number of insightful monographs by scholars such as Daniel Dreisbach and Mark David Hall, which not only articulate the deeper historical and biblical roots of American resistance, but which also argue for the centrality of religion during the nation’s founding era. Steward’s prose is clear and accessible, although this writer thinks he tended to overquote his sources when he could have cited them in his own words. The research notes are thorough and provide several interesting insights into his evidence and argument. In sum, Justifying Revolution is a deeply researched volume that specialists in the American Revolution will find well worth reading.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信