多西环素加甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑与多西环肽加利福平治疗布鲁氏菌病的随机对照试验

W. Hassan, M. Abdel-Gawad, A. Abdelmohsen
{"title":"多西环素加甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑与多西环肽加利福平治疗布鲁氏菌病的随机对照试验","authors":"W. Hassan, M. Abdel-Gawad, A. Abdelmohsen","doi":"10.4103/azmj.azmj_61_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aim Brucellosis is one of the most common endemic zoonotic diseases that have large animal and human burden. Many regimens of drug combinations are used for a variable period (at least 6 weeks). Rifampicin with doxycycline is one of the most used combinations. In this respect, we aimed to compare between the efficacy of two different combinations: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combined with doxycycline (TMX-Doxy) versus rifampicin combined with doxycycline (Rif-Doxy). Patient and methods Between June 2020 and January 2022, 100 patients with brucellosis were included. Half of them (50 patients) received TMX-Doxy, whereas the other half (50 patients) received Rif-Doxy for 6 weeks. Follow-up was done during the treatment course and 6 months after the end of treatment to detect successfully treated cases, failed-to-treat cases, and relapsed cases. Results The success rates of both used drug regimens were comparable, with the rate of success of TMX-Doxy combination being 90%, whereas it was 94% in the RIF-Doxy group (P=0.23). The failure rate was 4% in the TMX-Doxy group and 2% in the RIF-Doxy group (P=0.31). Relapse of brucellosis was recorded in 6% of patients in the TMX-Doxy group, whereas it was 4% of patients in the RIF-Doxy group (P=0.32). The adverse effects of both drug combinations were mild and self-limited, and none of the enrolled patients needed to stop treatment. Conclusion Combination of TMX-Doxy is effective, safe, and not inferior to the more used RIF-Doxy combination.","PeriodicalId":7711,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"333 - 337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Doxycycline Plus Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole versus Doxycycline plus Rifampicin in Treatment of Brucellosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"W. Hassan, M. Abdel-Gawad, A. Abdelmohsen\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/azmj.azmj_61_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and aim Brucellosis is one of the most common endemic zoonotic diseases that have large animal and human burden. Many regimens of drug combinations are used for a variable period (at least 6 weeks). Rifampicin with doxycycline is one of the most used combinations. In this respect, we aimed to compare between the efficacy of two different combinations: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combined with doxycycline (TMX-Doxy) versus rifampicin combined with doxycycline (Rif-Doxy). Patient and methods Between June 2020 and January 2022, 100 patients with brucellosis were included. Half of them (50 patients) received TMX-Doxy, whereas the other half (50 patients) received Rif-Doxy for 6 weeks. Follow-up was done during the treatment course and 6 months after the end of treatment to detect successfully treated cases, failed-to-treat cases, and relapsed cases. Results The success rates of both used drug regimens were comparable, with the rate of success of TMX-Doxy combination being 90%, whereas it was 94% in the RIF-Doxy group (P=0.23). The failure rate was 4% in the TMX-Doxy group and 2% in the RIF-Doxy group (P=0.31). Relapse of brucellosis was recorded in 6% of patients in the TMX-Doxy group, whereas it was 4% of patients in the RIF-Doxy group (P=0.32). The adverse effects of both drug combinations were mild and self-limited, and none of the enrolled patients needed to stop treatment. Conclusion Combination of TMX-Doxy is effective, safe, and not inferior to the more used RIF-Doxy combination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"333 - 337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/azmj.azmj_61_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/azmj.azmj_61_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的布鲁氏菌病是最常见的地方性人畜共患疾病之一,对动物和人类造成巨大负担。许多药物组合方案的使用时间不等(至少6周)。利福平与强力霉素是最常用的组合之一。在这方面,我们旨在比较两种不同组合的疗效:甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑联合强力霉素(TMX-Doxy)与利福平联合强力霉素(Rif-Doxy)。患者和方法2020年6月至2022年1月,纳入100例布鲁氏菌病患者。其中一半(50例)接受TMX-Doxy治疗,另一半(50例)接受Rif-Doxy治疗,疗程6周。在治疗期间和治疗结束后6个月进行随访,以发现治疗成功病例、治疗失败病例和复发病例。结果两种用药方案的成功率具有可比性,TMX-Doxy联合用药的成功率为90%,而RIF-Doxy联合用药的成功率为94% (P=0.23)。TMX-Doxy组失败率为4%,RIF-Doxy组为2% (P=0.31)。在TMX-Doxy组中,6%的患者复发布鲁氏菌病,而在RIF-Doxy组中,这一比例为4% (P=0.32)。两种药物组合的不良反应都是轻微且自限性的,并且没有入组的患者需要停止治疗。结论TMX-Doxy联合用药有效、安全,不逊于常用的RIF-Doxy联合用药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Doxycycline Plus Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole versus Doxycycline plus Rifampicin in Treatment of Brucellosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background and aim Brucellosis is one of the most common endemic zoonotic diseases that have large animal and human burden. Many regimens of drug combinations are used for a variable period (at least 6 weeks). Rifampicin with doxycycline is one of the most used combinations. In this respect, we aimed to compare between the efficacy of two different combinations: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combined with doxycycline (TMX-Doxy) versus rifampicin combined with doxycycline (Rif-Doxy). Patient and methods Between June 2020 and January 2022, 100 patients with brucellosis were included. Half of them (50 patients) received TMX-Doxy, whereas the other half (50 patients) received Rif-Doxy for 6 weeks. Follow-up was done during the treatment course and 6 months after the end of treatment to detect successfully treated cases, failed-to-treat cases, and relapsed cases. Results The success rates of both used drug regimens were comparable, with the rate of success of TMX-Doxy combination being 90%, whereas it was 94% in the RIF-Doxy group (P=0.23). The failure rate was 4% in the TMX-Doxy group and 2% in the RIF-Doxy group (P=0.31). Relapse of brucellosis was recorded in 6% of patients in the TMX-Doxy group, whereas it was 4% of patients in the RIF-Doxy group (P=0.32). The adverse effects of both drug combinations were mild and self-limited, and none of the enrolled patients needed to stop treatment. Conclusion Combination of TMX-Doxy is effective, safe, and not inferior to the more used RIF-Doxy combination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信