普通室内设计教学法

IF 0.2 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE
O. Hamilton
{"title":"普通室内设计教学法","authors":"O. Hamilton","doi":"10.1080/20419112.2019.1565678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is concerned with articulating the value of bringing commoning and spatial design pedagogy together. Developing a four-day intensive for the 130 first year interior design students to be held off-campus in the first two weeks of the students’ education became a space to explore this proposition. The purpose of the intensive was to encourage a supportive and robust student culture in and to introduce a more relational understanding of interior design and its capacity to effect social and spatial life early in their design studies. These pedagogical aims were framed and also addressed by commoning values that underpinned the design and delivery of the course work. The interior design studio classroom is particularly suited to teaching approaches guided by processes and frameworks of commoning. Commoning entails locating self-interest within broader interests that privilege the wellbeing and ecology of the community. Although more frequently understood as the processes that occur when people manage and maintain a shared resource, it can also apply to the relations that occur when people maintain a shared interest or project. The values encouraged by commoning processes mean that self-interest is located within broader interests that privilege the well-being and ecology of the community. These attitudes contrast with the prescribed activities and increasingly corporatised conditions preferred by neoliberalism within learning institutions. For these reasons and others, commoning is of specific use within the design classroom in that it produces learning through experience that can result in stronger political, social and critical perspective and develop other values for social-spatial design to those prescribed by commerce. The intensive aimed to encourage inclusive and emergent processes as a way of working together to introduce a more expansive view of the implications and experience of interiors, interior education and interior design. The interior design classroom studio becomes a space of engagement design with and guided by, processes of commoning.","PeriodicalId":41420,"journal":{"name":"Interiors-Design Architecture Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20419112.2019.1565678","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commoning Interior Design Pedagogy\",\"authors\":\"O. Hamilton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20419112.2019.1565678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is concerned with articulating the value of bringing commoning and spatial design pedagogy together. Developing a four-day intensive for the 130 first year interior design students to be held off-campus in the first two weeks of the students’ education became a space to explore this proposition. The purpose of the intensive was to encourage a supportive and robust student culture in and to introduce a more relational understanding of interior design and its capacity to effect social and spatial life early in their design studies. These pedagogical aims were framed and also addressed by commoning values that underpinned the design and delivery of the course work. The interior design studio classroom is particularly suited to teaching approaches guided by processes and frameworks of commoning. Commoning entails locating self-interest within broader interests that privilege the wellbeing and ecology of the community. Although more frequently understood as the processes that occur when people manage and maintain a shared resource, it can also apply to the relations that occur when people maintain a shared interest or project. The values encouraged by commoning processes mean that self-interest is located within broader interests that privilege the well-being and ecology of the community. These attitudes contrast with the prescribed activities and increasingly corporatised conditions preferred by neoliberalism within learning institutions. For these reasons and others, commoning is of specific use within the design classroom in that it produces learning through experience that can result in stronger political, social and critical perspective and develop other values for social-spatial design to those prescribed by commerce. The intensive aimed to encourage inclusive and emergent processes as a way of working together to introduce a more expansive view of the implications and experience of interiors, interior education and interior design. The interior design classroom studio becomes a space of engagement design with and guided by, processes of commoning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interiors-Design Architecture Culture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20419112.2019.1565678\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interiors-Design Architecture Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20419112.2019.1565678\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interiors-Design Architecture Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20419112.2019.1565678","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文关注的是阐明将公共设计和空间设计教学法结合在一起的价值。在学生教育的前两周,为130名一年级室内设计学生开展为期四天的校外密集活动,成为探索这一命题的空间。强化课程的目的是鼓励支持性和强大的学生文化,并在设计学习的早期引入对室内设计及其影响社会和空间生活的能力的更相关的理解。这些教学目标是由支撑课程设计和交付的共同价值观框架和解决的。室内设计工作室教室特别适合以共同的过程和框架为指导的教学方法。共同性需要将自身利益置于更广泛的利益之中,从而为社区的福祉和生态带来特权。虽然更常被理解为人们管理和维护共享资源时发生的过程,但它也可以应用于人们维护共享兴趣或项目时发生的关系。共同进程所鼓励的价值观意味着,自身利益处于更广泛的利益之中,有利于社区的福祉和生态。这些态度与新自由主义在学习机构中所偏好的规定活动和日益企业化的条件形成鲜明对比。由于这些原因和其他原因,common在设计课堂中有特殊的用途,因为它通过经验产生学习,可以产生更强的政治、社会和批判视角,并为社会空间设计开发其他价值,而不是商业规定的价值。密集的目的是鼓励包容和紧急的过程,作为一种共同努力的方式,引入更广泛的内饰、室内教育和室内设计的影响和经验。室内设计教室工作室成为一个参与设计的空间,并以共同的过程为指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Commoning Interior Design Pedagogy
This paper is concerned with articulating the value of bringing commoning and spatial design pedagogy together. Developing a four-day intensive for the 130 first year interior design students to be held off-campus in the first two weeks of the students’ education became a space to explore this proposition. The purpose of the intensive was to encourage a supportive and robust student culture in and to introduce a more relational understanding of interior design and its capacity to effect social and spatial life early in their design studies. These pedagogical aims were framed and also addressed by commoning values that underpinned the design and delivery of the course work. The interior design studio classroom is particularly suited to teaching approaches guided by processes and frameworks of commoning. Commoning entails locating self-interest within broader interests that privilege the wellbeing and ecology of the community. Although more frequently understood as the processes that occur when people manage and maintain a shared resource, it can also apply to the relations that occur when people maintain a shared interest or project. The values encouraged by commoning processes mean that self-interest is located within broader interests that privilege the well-being and ecology of the community. These attitudes contrast with the prescribed activities and increasingly corporatised conditions preferred by neoliberalism within learning institutions. For these reasons and others, commoning is of specific use within the design classroom in that it produces learning through experience that can result in stronger political, social and critical perspective and develop other values for social-spatial design to those prescribed by commerce. The intensive aimed to encourage inclusive and emergent processes as a way of working together to introduce a more expansive view of the implications and experience of interiors, interior education and interior design. The interior design classroom studio becomes a space of engagement design with and guided by, processes of commoning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信