重新设计斯里兰卡预防地中海贫血的新政策选择

IF 0.6 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Nadeeja Amarasinghe, Amila Amarasena, Anoj Thabrew, Prabath Wearawatte, A. Premawardhena, F. Malik, Mohamed Abusaeed, Champika Wickramasinghe
{"title":"重新设计斯里兰卡预防地中海贫血的新政策选择","authors":"Nadeeja Amarasinghe, Amila Amarasena, Anoj Thabrew, Prabath Wearawatte, A. Premawardhena, F. Malik, Mohamed Abusaeed, Champika Wickramasinghe","doi":"10.3390/thalassrep12040018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sri Lanka, a country with 22 million people, has nearly 2000 thalassemia patients with severe thalassemia, two-thirds of whom have beta thalassemia major (TM). The current prevention program based on promoting “safe marriages”, which has been in existence for over 15 years, has failed to reduce thalassemia major births. We set about to examine the cost-effectiveness of novel policy options for thalassemia prevention in Sri Lanka. Methods: The current cost for treatment of a thalassemia major patient (USD 2602/yr) was compared against the cost per reduction of single birth with three novel strategies, namely intensifying the screening in the current five districts combined with an education program (policy option 1), a nationwide screening program (policy option 2), and antenatal screening combined with the termination of pregnancy (policy option 3). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the different strategies was calculated. Results: The status quo was considered to reduce one TM birth whilst the new policy options were able to reduce births by 14, 35, and 48, respectively. The costs incurred for the program for a year for status quo and the three novel programs were USD 104,788, 173,884, 781,372, and 904,186 respectively. Cost per prevention of a thalassemia major birth was USD 87,324, 12,420, 22,324, and 20,084, respectively. The lifetime cost per treatment of a thalassemia major patient was USD 34,653. Conclusions: Given the current legal restriction on termination of pregnancy for fetal indications, policy option 2, an island-wide screening with mass education, is the most cost-effective and will be expected to deliver a substantial reduction in new births","PeriodicalId":22261,"journal":{"name":"Thalassemia Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Redesigning New Policy Options for Thalassemia Prevention in Sri Lanka\",\"authors\":\"Nadeeja Amarasinghe, Amila Amarasena, Anoj Thabrew, Prabath Wearawatte, A. Premawardhena, F. Malik, Mohamed Abusaeed, Champika Wickramasinghe\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/thalassrep12040018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sri Lanka, a country with 22 million people, has nearly 2000 thalassemia patients with severe thalassemia, two-thirds of whom have beta thalassemia major (TM). The current prevention program based on promoting “safe marriages”, which has been in existence for over 15 years, has failed to reduce thalassemia major births. We set about to examine the cost-effectiveness of novel policy options for thalassemia prevention in Sri Lanka. Methods: The current cost for treatment of a thalassemia major patient (USD 2602/yr) was compared against the cost per reduction of single birth with three novel strategies, namely intensifying the screening in the current five districts combined with an education program (policy option 1), a nationwide screening program (policy option 2), and antenatal screening combined with the termination of pregnancy (policy option 3). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the different strategies was calculated. Results: The status quo was considered to reduce one TM birth whilst the new policy options were able to reduce births by 14, 35, and 48, respectively. The costs incurred for the program for a year for status quo and the three novel programs were USD 104,788, 173,884, 781,372, and 904,186 respectively. Cost per prevention of a thalassemia major birth was USD 87,324, 12,420, 22,324, and 20,084, respectively. The lifetime cost per treatment of a thalassemia major patient was USD 34,653. Conclusions: Given the current legal restriction on termination of pregnancy for fetal indications, policy option 2, an island-wide screening with mass education, is the most cost-effective and will be expected to deliver a substantial reduction in new births\",\"PeriodicalId\":22261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thalassemia Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thalassemia Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/thalassrep12040018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thalassemia Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/thalassrep12040018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

斯里兰卡是一个拥有2200万人口的国家,有近2000名患有严重地中海贫血的地中海贫血患者,其中三分之二患有严重β地中海贫血(TM)。目前以促进“安全婚姻”为基础的预防计划已经实施了15年多,但未能减少地中海贫血的重大分娩。我们开始研究斯里兰卡预防地中海贫血的新政策选择的成本效益。方法:用三种新策略将目前地中海贫血主要患者的治疗成本(2602美元/年)与每次减少单胎出生的成本进行比较,即在当前五个地区加强筛查并结合教育计划(政策选项1)、全国筛查计划(政策选项2),产前筛查结合终止妊娠(政策选择3)。计算了不同策略的增量成本效益比(ICER)。结果:现状被认为减少了一个TM出生,而新的政策选择能够分别减少14、35和48个出生。针对现状和三个新项目,该项目一年的成本分别为104788美元、173884美元、781372美元和904186美元。预防严重地中海贫血分娩的费用分别为87324美元、12420美元、22324美元和20084美元。地中海贫血主要患者每次治疗的终生费用为34653美元。结论:鉴于目前对因胎儿适应症终止妊娠的法律限制,政策选择2,即全岛范围的大规模教育筛查,是最具成本效益的,预计将大幅减少新生儿数量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Redesigning New Policy Options for Thalassemia Prevention in Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka, a country with 22 million people, has nearly 2000 thalassemia patients with severe thalassemia, two-thirds of whom have beta thalassemia major (TM). The current prevention program based on promoting “safe marriages”, which has been in existence for over 15 years, has failed to reduce thalassemia major births. We set about to examine the cost-effectiveness of novel policy options for thalassemia prevention in Sri Lanka. Methods: The current cost for treatment of a thalassemia major patient (USD 2602/yr) was compared against the cost per reduction of single birth with three novel strategies, namely intensifying the screening in the current five districts combined with an education program (policy option 1), a nationwide screening program (policy option 2), and antenatal screening combined with the termination of pregnancy (policy option 3). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the different strategies was calculated. Results: The status quo was considered to reduce one TM birth whilst the new policy options were able to reduce births by 14, 35, and 48, respectively. The costs incurred for the program for a year for status quo and the three novel programs were USD 104,788, 173,884, 781,372, and 904,186 respectively. Cost per prevention of a thalassemia major birth was USD 87,324, 12,420, 22,324, and 20,084, respectively. The lifetime cost per treatment of a thalassemia major patient was USD 34,653. Conclusions: Given the current legal restriction on termination of pregnancy for fetal indications, policy option 2, an island-wide screening with mass education, is the most cost-effective and will be expected to deliver a substantial reduction in new births
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thalassemia Reports
Thalassemia Reports HEMATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信