欧洲专利公约下的算法可解释性和充分披露要求

Liva Rudzite
{"title":"欧洲专利公约下的算法可解释性和充分披露要求","authors":"Liva Rudzite","doi":"10.12697/ji.2022.31.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence and its subsector machine learning differs from traditional programming. For this reason, coupled with its potential benefits to society in many arenas, it has been articulated as one of the key priorities in the European Union. Such characteristics specific to artificial intelligence as models with increased accuracy and generalisation power may accentuate issues of algorithmic explainability that can defy patentability. Accordingly, the article focuses on the legal requirements related to the ‘sufficient disclosure’ criterion under the legal framework for patents as one facet of deciding on the patentability of the invention, and it addresses potential solutions for overcoming issues of algorithmic explainability. The author argues that solutions introducing a system involving deposit of the algorithm, training data, or both might not be as effective a mechanism for tackling those issues as instead implementing a recognised certification system.","PeriodicalId":55758,"journal":{"name":"Juridica International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Algorithmic Explainability and the Sufficient-Disclosure Requirement under the European Patent Convention\",\"authors\":\"Liva Rudzite\",\"doi\":\"10.12697/ji.2022.31.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Artificial intelligence and its subsector machine learning differs from traditional programming. For this reason, coupled with its potential benefits to society in many arenas, it has been articulated as one of the key priorities in the European Union. Such characteristics specific to artificial intelligence as models with increased accuracy and generalisation power may accentuate issues of algorithmic explainability that can defy patentability. Accordingly, the article focuses on the legal requirements related to the ‘sufficient disclosure’ criterion under the legal framework for patents as one facet of deciding on the patentability of the invention, and it addresses potential solutions for overcoming issues of algorithmic explainability. The author argues that solutions introducing a system involving deposit of the algorithm, training data, or both might not be as effective a mechanism for tackling those issues as instead implementing a recognised certification system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Juridica International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Juridica International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12697/ji.2022.31.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridica International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12697/ji.2022.31.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

人工智能及其子领域机器学习不同于传统编程。由于这个原因,再加上它在许多领域对社会的潜在好处,它已被明确表示为欧洲联盟的关键优先事项之一。这些人工智能特有的特征,如具有更高准确性和泛化能力的模型,可能会突出算法的可解释性问题,这可能会违背可专利性。因此,本文将重点放在专利法律框架下与“充分披露”标准相关的法律要求上,作为决定发明可专利性的一个方面,并讨论了克服算法可解释性问题的潜在解决方案。作者认为,引入涉及算法、训练数据或两者并存的系统的解决方案,可能不如实施公认的认证系统那样有效地解决这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Algorithmic Explainability and the Sufficient-Disclosure Requirement under the European Patent Convention
Artificial intelligence and its subsector machine learning differs from traditional programming. For this reason, coupled with its potential benefits to society in many arenas, it has been articulated as one of the key priorities in the European Union. Such characteristics specific to artificial intelligence as models with increased accuracy and generalisation power may accentuate issues of algorithmic explainability that can defy patentability. Accordingly, the article focuses on the legal requirements related to the ‘sufficient disclosure’ criterion under the legal framework for patents as one facet of deciding on the patentability of the invention, and it addresses potential solutions for overcoming issues of algorithmic explainability. The author argues that solutions introducing a system involving deposit of the algorithm, training data, or both might not be as effective a mechanism for tackling those issues as instead implementing a recognised certification system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信