体育礼仪:或者如何在不相信上帝比其他人更爱汤姆·布雷迪的情况下庆祝意外事件

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
Jason M. Smith
{"title":"体育礼仪:或者如何在不相信上帝比其他人更爱汤姆·布雷迪的情况下庆祝意外事件","authors":"Jason M. Smith","doi":"10.1080/0458063X.2021.1990654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In what follows, I want to treat two thinkers who will help us think through two distinct ways in which sport—either participating in sport as a player or following sport as a fan—might be construed as “liturgy.” The first is theorist of religion Jonathan Z. Smith, who will help us to think of sport as a kind of ritual rationalization of a deeply broken world. Indeed, Smith will show how the patterned-behavior that accompanies something like sport as liturgy functions to bring an unendurable world of chaos under control, though it is a feinted and false sense of control that ought not to be the goal of any genuine liturgy. The second thinker will be Lincoln Harvey, who I take to be the most significant among those who attempt to articulate a “theology of sport.” For Harvey, sport is the “liturgical celebration of our contingency.” Sport is absolutely a kind of liturgy, but what it celebrates is not God per se but rather the beautiful contingency of an unnecessary creation. We do not wish the world away or wish it to be anything other than it is. Sport, instead, is our liturgical celebration of our contingent being. I shall find these perspectives on sport as liturgy unsatisfying, but not entirely false. Indeed, I shall recommend ultimately that Christians take up something like Harvey’s position as a corrective to the natural inertia toward escapism that the ritual of sport often imposes upon those of us who follow them. Yet, I will level a significant theological objection against Harvey’s account of sport— namely, that he pushes his account of sport as contingent slightly too far by insisting that sport is unique among human activity as entirely immune from God’s providence. I take that assertion to be false, but I do not find it so fundamental to Harvey’s argument as to scuttle his account of sport as liturgy entirely. Thus, I present in the final section a brief modification of Harvey on the unique sort of liturgy that sport ought to be—a liturgical celebration of all that is not God.","PeriodicalId":53923,"journal":{"name":"Liturgy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Liturgy of Sports: Or How to Celebrate Contingency without Believing That God Loves Tom Brady More Than Everyone Else\",\"authors\":\"Jason M. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0458063X.2021.1990654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In what follows, I want to treat two thinkers who will help us think through two distinct ways in which sport—either participating in sport as a player or following sport as a fan—might be construed as “liturgy.” The first is theorist of religion Jonathan Z. Smith, who will help us to think of sport as a kind of ritual rationalization of a deeply broken world. Indeed, Smith will show how the patterned-behavior that accompanies something like sport as liturgy functions to bring an unendurable world of chaos under control, though it is a feinted and false sense of control that ought not to be the goal of any genuine liturgy. The second thinker will be Lincoln Harvey, who I take to be the most significant among those who attempt to articulate a “theology of sport.” For Harvey, sport is the “liturgical celebration of our contingency.” Sport is absolutely a kind of liturgy, but what it celebrates is not God per se but rather the beautiful contingency of an unnecessary creation. We do not wish the world away or wish it to be anything other than it is. Sport, instead, is our liturgical celebration of our contingent being. I shall find these perspectives on sport as liturgy unsatisfying, but not entirely false. Indeed, I shall recommend ultimately that Christians take up something like Harvey’s position as a corrective to the natural inertia toward escapism that the ritual of sport often imposes upon those of us who follow them. Yet, I will level a significant theological objection against Harvey’s account of sport— namely, that he pushes his account of sport as contingent slightly too far by insisting that sport is unique among human activity as entirely immune from God’s providence. I take that assertion to be false, but I do not find it so fundamental to Harvey’s argument as to scuttle his account of sport as liturgy entirely. Thus, I present in the final section a brief modification of Harvey on the unique sort of liturgy that sport ought to be—a liturgical celebration of all that is not God.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liturgy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liturgy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0458063X.2021.1990654\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liturgy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0458063X.2021.1990654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在接下来的文章中,我想谈谈两位思想家,他们将帮助我们思考体育运动——无论是作为运动员参加体育运动,还是作为球迷关注体育运动——可能被解释为“礼拜仪式”的两种不同方式。第一位是宗教理论家乔纳森·史密斯,他将帮助我们将体育运动视为一种对一个支离破碎的世界的仪式合理化。事实上,史密斯将展示体育作为礼拜仪式所伴随的模式行为是如何控制一个难以忍受的混乱世界的,尽管这是一种虚假的控制感,不应该成为任何真正礼拜仪式的目标。第二位思想家将是Lincoln Harvey,我认为他是那些试图阐明“体育神学”的人中最重要的一位。对Harvey来说,体育是“对我们偶然性的仪式庆祝”。体育绝对是一种仪式,但它庆祝的不是上帝本身,而是一个不必要的创造的美丽偶然性。我们不希望世界消失,也不希望世界变成别的样子。相反,体育是我们对我们队伍存在的仪式性庆祝。我会发现这些关于体育仪式的观点令人不满意,但也并非完全错误。事实上,我最终建议基督徒采取类似哈维的立场,纠正体育仪式经常强加给我们这些追随他们的人的逃避现实的自然惯性。然而,我将对哈维对体育的描述提出一个重大的神学反对意见,即他坚持认为体育在人类活动中是独一无二的,完全不受上帝的眷顾,从而将自己对体育的解释推得有点过分。我认为这种说法是错误的,但我不认为这是哈维论点的根本,以至于完全破坏了他对体育作为礼拜仪式的描述。因此,我在最后一节对哈维关于体育应该是一种独特的礼拜仪式的简短修改——一种对所有非上帝事物的礼拜庆祝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Liturgy of Sports: Or How to Celebrate Contingency without Believing That God Loves Tom Brady More Than Everyone Else
In what follows, I want to treat two thinkers who will help us think through two distinct ways in which sport—either participating in sport as a player or following sport as a fan—might be construed as “liturgy.” The first is theorist of religion Jonathan Z. Smith, who will help us to think of sport as a kind of ritual rationalization of a deeply broken world. Indeed, Smith will show how the patterned-behavior that accompanies something like sport as liturgy functions to bring an unendurable world of chaos under control, though it is a feinted and false sense of control that ought not to be the goal of any genuine liturgy. The second thinker will be Lincoln Harvey, who I take to be the most significant among those who attempt to articulate a “theology of sport.” For Harvey, sport is the “liturgical celebration of our contingency.” Sport is absolutely a kind of liturgy, but what it celebrates is not God per se but rather the beautiful contingency of an unnecessary creation. We do not wish the world away or wish it to be anything other than it is. Sport, instead, is our liturgical celebration of our contingent being. I shall find these perspectives on sport as liturgy unsatisfying, but not entirely false. Indeed, I shall recommend ultimately that Christians take up something like Harvey’s position as a corrective to the natural inertia toward escapism that the ritual of sport often imposes upon those of us who follow them. Yet, I will level a significant theological objection against Harvey’s account of sport— namely, that he pushes his account of sport as contingent slightly too far by insisting that sport is unique among human activity as entirely immune from God’s providence. I take that assertion to be false, but I do not find it so fundamental to Harvey’s argument as to scuttle his account of sport as liturgy entirely. Thus, I present in the final section a brief modification of Harvey on the unique sort of liturgy that sport ought to be—a liturgical celebration of all that is not God.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Liturgy
Liturgy RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信