{"title":"P-12学校舞蹈教学艺术家的准备、政策和工作挑战:来自该领域的观点","authors":"Doug Risner, Sam Horning, Bryant Henderson Shea","doi":"10.1080/10632913.2021.2004959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The primary aims of this qualitative interpretive inquiry were to gain better understanding of dance teaching artists’ preparation and preparedness, workplace challenges, and the role and impact of policy and regulations in P-12 schools. A secondary aim focused upon identifying school environments that support effective and purposeful dance teaching artistry. The collective knowledge and experiences of six expert informants provide important insights and critical questions about dance teaching artist status and marginalization, bureaucratic challenges, and obstacles in developing relevant postsecondary programs that value teaching, pedagogy and community engagement alongside artistic practice, technique, and performance. Findings suggest an adept teaching artist adapts to shifting environmental conditions of the school and its administration. A flexible teaching artist carefully devises and revises lesson plans, objectives, and goals in relation to each particular group of students. A receptive teaching artist skillfully hones their pedagogy and teaching methods in alignment with curriculum and curricular goals. A sensitive teaching artist translates and fulfills the needs of the school and the student communities they serve with a strong desire to collaborate with classroom teachers and dance specialist teachers.","PeriodicalId":37632,"journal":{"name":"Arts Education Policy Review","volume":"124 1","pages":"113 - 126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preparation, policy, and workplace challenges of dance teaching artists in P-12 schools: perspectives from the field\",\"authors\":\"Doug Risner, Sam Horning, Bryant Henderson Shea\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10632913.2021.2004959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The primary aims of this qualitative interpretive inquiry were to gain better understanding of dance teaching artists’ preparation and preparedness, workplace challenges, and the role and impact of policy and regulations in P-12 schools. A secondary aim focused upon identifying school environments that support effective and purposeful dance teaching artistry. The collective knowledge and experiences of six expert informants provide important insights and critical questions about dance teaching artist status and marginalization, bureaucratic challenges, and obstacles in developing relevant postsecondary programs that value teaching, pedagogy and community engagement alongside artistic practice, technique, and performance. Findings suggest an adept teaching artist adapts to shifting environmental conditions of the school and its administration. A flexible teaching artist carefully devises and revises lesson plans, objectives, and goals in relation to each particular group of students. A receptive teaching artist skillfully hones their pedagogy and teaching methods in alignment with curriculum and curricular goals. A sensitive teaching artist translates and fulfills the needs of the school and the student communities they serve with a strong desire to collaborate with classroom teachers and dance specialist teachers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arts Education Policy Review\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"113 - 126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arts Education Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2021.2004959\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts Education Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2021.2004959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Preparation, policy, and workplace challenges of dance teaching artists in P-12 schools: perspectives from the field
Abstract The primary aims of this qualitative interpretive inquiry were to gain better understanding of dance teaching artists’ preparation and preparedness, workplace challenges, and the role and impact of policy and regulations in P-12 schools. A secondary aim focused upon identifying school environments that support effective and purposeful dance teaching artistry. The collective knowledge and experiences of six expert informants provide important insights and critical questions about dance teaching artist status and marginalization, bureaucratic challenges, and obstacles in developing relevant postsecondary programs that value teaching, pedagogy and community engagement alongside artistic practice, technique, and performance. Findings suggest an adept teaching artist adapts to shifting environmental conditions of the school and its administration. A flexible teaching artist carefully devises and revises lesson plans, objectives, and goals in relation to each particular group of students. A receptive teaching artist skillfully hones their pedagogy and teaching methods in alignment with curriculum and curricular goals. A sensitive teaching artist translates and fulfills the needs of the school and the student communities they serve with a strong desire to collaborate with classroom teachers and dance specialist teachers.
期刊介绍:
Arts Education Policy Review ( AEPR) presents discussion of major policy issues in arts education in the United States and throughout the world. Addressing education in music, visual arts, theatre, and dance, the journal presents a variety of views and emphasizes critical analysis. Its goal is to produce the most comprehensive and rigorous exchange of ideas available on arts education policy. Policy examinations from multiple viewpoints are a valuable resource not only for arts educators, but also for administrators, policy analysts, advocacy groups, parents, and audiences—all those involved in the arts and concerned about their role in education. AEPR focuses on analyses and recommendations focused on policy. The goal of any article should not be description or celebration (although reports of successful programs could be part of an article). Any article focused on a program (or programs) should address why something works or does not work, how it works, how it could work better, and most important, what various policy stakeholders (from teachers to legislators) can do about it. AEPR does not promote individuals, institutions, methods, or products. It does not aim to repeat commonplace ideas. Editors want articles that show originality, probe deeply, and take discussion beyond common wisdom and familiar rhetoric. Articles that merely restate the importance of arts education, call attention to the existence of issues long since addressed, or repeat standard solutions will not be accepted.