中国对联盟与结盟的看法:中国外交关系中的陷阱问题

IF 1 Q2 AREA STUDIES
L. Odgaard
{"title":"中国对联盟与结盟的看法:中国外交关系中的陷阱问题","authors":"L. Odgaard","doi":"10.1080/03068374.2023.2230782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article traces concerns about entrapment in Chinese thinking about foreign relations and how these concerns have resulted in a general rejection of alliances. The People’s Republic of China was born with entrapment dilemmas vis-à-vis the Soviet Union that became real when Beijing was drawn into the Korean War at a time that did not suit Beijing’s strategic interests. During the post-Cold War era, China’s dialogue and coordination with NATO has given its leadership greater knowledge of the alliance’s strengths and weaknesses and confirmed Beijing in its scepticism towards formal alliances. Instead, China has set out to build more flexible partnerships, particularly with Russia, that allow both sides of the arrangement to avoid entrapment in each other’s different geopolitical security agendas. In an era of strategic competition with the United States, Beijing’s partnership with Moscow has become the cornerstone of Chinese efforts to protect its global power and influence. At the same time, China’s leadership has sought to avoid new entrapments by expanding its security engagement with countries in the “Global South”. Besides commitments to limited cooperation such as joint exercises and training, protection of Chinese overseas interests in arms sales, in countering Western strategic aims, and in establishing a strategic military presence are at the centre of such engagements. Far-reaching commitments to protect the security interests of other countries and close integration of Chinese and foreign military forces are not on the cards. Such agreements would come at the cost of flexible partnerships and Beijing’s freedom of action.","PeriodicalId":44282,"journal":{"name":"Asian Affairs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CHINESE PERSPECTIVES ON ALLIANCE AND ALIGNMENT: ENTRAPMENT CONCERNS IN CHINA’S FOREIGN RELATIONS\",\"authors\":\"L. Odgaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03068374.2023.2230782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article traces concerns about entrapment in Chinese thinking about foreign relations and how these concerns have resulted in a general rejection of alliances. The People’s Republic of China was born with entrapment dilemmas vis-à-vis the Soviet Union that became real when Beijing was drawn into the Korean War at a time that did not suit Beijing’s strategic interests. During the post-Cold War era, China’s dialogue and coordination with NATO has given its leadership greater knowledge of the alliance’s strengths and weaknesses and confirmed Beijing in its scepticism towards formal alliances. Instead, China has set out to build more flexible partnerships, particularly with Russia, that allow both sides of the arrangement to avoid entrapment in each other’s different geopolitical security agendas. In an era of strategic competition with the United States, Beijing’s partnership with Moscow has become the cornerstone of Chinese efforts to protect its global power and influence. At the same time, China’s leadership has sought to avoid new entrapments by expanding its security engagement with countries in the “Global South”. Besides commitments to limited cooperation such as joint exercises and training, protection of Chinese overseas interests in arms sales, in countering Western strategic aims, and in establishing a strategic military presence are at the centre of such engagements. Far-reaching commitments to protect the security interests of other countries and close integration of Chinese and foreign military forces are not on the cards. Such agreements would come at the cost of flexible partnerships and Beijing’s freedom of action.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Affairs\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2023.2230782\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2023.2230782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章追溯了中国人对外交关系思维中的陷阱的担忧,以及这些担忧是如何导致普遍拒绝结盟的。中华人民共和国一出生就面临着与苏联的进退两难-à-vis,当北京在不符合北京战略利益的情况下被卷入朝鲜战争时,这种困境成为现实。在后冷战时期,中国与北约(NATO)的对话与协调使其领导层更加了解该联盟的优势和劣势,并证实了北京方面对正式联盟的怀疑。相反,中国已着手建立更灵活的伙伴关系,尤其是与俄罗斯的伙伴关系,使双方都能避免陷入彼此不同的地缘政治安全议程。在与美国进行战略竞争的时代,北京与莫斯科的伙伴关系已成为中国保护其全球实力和影响力的基石。与此同时,中国领导层试图通过扩大与“全球南方”国家的安全接触,避免陷入新的陷阱。除了对有限合作的承诺,如联合演习和训练,保护中国在武器销售中的海外利益,反击西方的战略目标,以及建立战略军事存在,这些都是这种接触的核心。不可能做出保护他国安全利益的深远承诺,也不可能实现中外军事力量的紧密融合。这样的协议将以牺牲灵活的伙伴关系和北京方面的行动自由为代价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CHINESE PERSPECTIVES ON ALLIANCE AND ALIGNMENT: ENTRAPMENT CONCERNS IN CHINA’S FOREIGN RELATIONS
The article traces concerns about entrapment in Chinese thinking about foreign relations and how these concerns have resulted in a general rejection of alliances. The People’s Republic of China was born with entrapment dilemmas vis-à-vis the Soviet Union that became real when Beijing was drawn into the Korean War at a time that did not suit Beijing’s strategic interests. During the post-Cold War era, China’s dialogue and coordination with NATO has given its leadership greater knowledge of the alliance’s strengths and weaknesses and confirmed Beijing in its scepticism towards formal alliances. Instead, China has set out to build more flexible partnerships, particularly with Russia, that allow both sides of the arrangement to avoid entrapment in each other’s different geopolitical security agendas. In an era of strategic competition with the United States, Beijing’s partnership with Moscow has become the cornerstone of Chinese efforts to protect its global power and influence. At the same time, China’s leadership has sought to avoid new entrapments by expanding its security engagement with countries in the “Global South”. Besides commitments to limited cooperation such as joint exercises and training, protection of Chinese overseas interests in arms sales, in countering Western strategic aims, and in establishing a strategic military presence are at the centre of such engagements. Far-reaching commitments to protect the security interests of other countries and close integration of Chinese and foreign military forces are not on the cards. Such agreements would come at the cost of flexible partnerships and Beijing’s freedom of action.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Affairs
Asian Affairs AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
126
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信