{"title":"风对带有护墙的大型低斜山墙屋顶建筑产生的压力","authors":"A. Aly, M. Thomas","doi":"10.1080/00038628.2023.2174066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper experimentally investigates how parapets with varying heights can alter the flow pattern around a large aspect-ratio low-sloped gable roof building. We examine the benefits and challenges of existing methods and utilize an open-jet wind test section, to accurately simulate real-world atmospheric boundary layer conditions. A model of a low-rise building was fitted with solid parapets of varying heights and tested in a comparative study to understand their impact on roof pressures. The study compares the standard approach to the experimental results and suggests improvements to wind zones and pressure coefficients. The parapet of fourteen percent of the building height is the most efficient at reducing mean, peak, and area-averaged wind loads compared to other sizes. However, the standard provisions underestimate roof pressures for components and cladding design.","PeriodicalId":47295,"journal":{"name":"Architectural Science Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wind induced pressures on a large low-sloped gable roof building with parapet\",\"authors\":\"A. Aly, M. Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00038628.2023.2174066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper experimentally investigates how parapets with varying heights can alter the flow pattern around a large aspect-ratio low-sloped gable roof building. We examine the benefits and challenges of existing methods and utilize an open-jet wind test section, to accurately simulate real-world atmospheric boundary layer conditions. A model of a low-rise building was fitted with solid parapets of varying heights and tested in a comparative study to understand their impact on roof pressures. The study compares the standard approach to the experimental results and suggests improvements to wind zones and pressure coefficients. The parapet of fourteen percent of the building height is the most efficient at reducing mean, peak, and area-averaged wind loads compared to other sizes. However, the standard provisions underestimate roof pressures for components and cladding design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Architectural Science Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Architectural Science Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2023.2174066\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architectural Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2023.2174066","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Wind induced pressures on a large low-sloped gable roof building with parapet
This paper experimentally investigates how parapets with varying heights can alter the flow pattern around a large aspect-ratio low-sloped gable roof building. We examine the benefits and challenges of existing methods and utilize an open-jet wind test section, to accurately simulate real-world atmospheric boundary layer conditions. A model of a low-rise building was fitted with solid parapets of varying heights and tested in a comparative study to understand their impact on roof pressures. The study compares the standard approach to the experimental results and suggests improvements to wind zones and pressure coefficients. The parapet of fourteen percent of the building height is the most efficient at reducing mean, peak, and area-averaged wind loads compared to other sizes. However, the standard provisions underestimate roof pressures for components and cladding design.
期刊介绍:
Founded at the University of Sydney in 1958 by Professor Henry Cowan to promote continued professional development, Architectural Science Review presents a balanced collection of papers on a wide range of topics. From its first issue over 50 years ago the journal documents the profession’s interest in environmental issues, covering topics such as thermal comfort, lighting, and sustainable architecture, contributing to this extensive field of knowledge by seeking papers from a broad geographical area. The journal is supported by an international editorial advisory board of the leading international academics and its reputation has increased globally with individual and institutional subscribers and contributors from around the world. As a result, Architectural Science Review continues to be recognised as not only one of the first, but the leading journal devoted to architectural science, technology and the built environment. Architectural Science Review publishes original research papers, shorter research notes, and abstracts of PhD dissertations and theses in all areas of architectural science including: -building science and technology -environmental sustainability -structures and materials -audio and acoustics -illumination -thermal systems -building physics -building services -building climatology -building economics -ergonomics -history and theory of architectural science -the social sciences of architecture