面向航空产品认证和批准的机器学习开发生命周期

IF 0.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
F. Kaakai, Konstantin Dmitriev, S. Adibhatla, E. Baskaya, Emanuele Bezzecchi, Ramesh Bharadwaj, Barclay Brown, Giacomo Gentile, C. Gingins, S. Grihon, Christophe Travers
{"title":"面向航空产品认证和批准的机器学习开发生命周期","authors":"F. Kaakai, Konstantin Dmitriev, S. Adibhatla, E. Baskaya, Emanuele Bezzecchi, Ramesh Bharadwaj, Barclay Brown, Giacomo Gentile, C. Gingins, S. Grihon, Christophe Travers","doi":"10.4271/01-15-02-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a new machine learning (ML) development lifecycle which will constitute the core of the new aeronautical standard on ML called AS6983, jointly being developed by working group WG-114/G34 of EUROCAE and SAE. The article also presents a survey of several existing standards and guidelines related to ML in aeronautics, automotive, and industrial domains by comparing and contrasting their scope, purpose, and results. Standards and guidelines reviewed include the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Concept Paper, the DEEL (DEpendable and Explainable Learning) white paper “Machine Learning in Certified Systems”, Aerospace Vehicle System Institute (AVSI) Authorization for Expenditure (AFE) 87 report on Machine Learning, Guidance on the Assurance of Machine Learning for use in Autonomous Systems (AMLAS), Laboratoire National de Metrologie et d’Essais (LNE) Certification Standard of Processes for AI, the Underwriters Laboratories (UL) 4600 Safety Standard for Autonomous Vehicles, and the paper on Assuring the Machine Learning Lifecycle. These standards and guidelines are examined from the perspective of the learning assurance objectives they propose, and the means of evaluation and compliance for achieving these learning objectives. The reference used for comparison is the list of learning assurance objectives defined within the framework of AS6983 development. From this comparative analysis, and based on a coverage criterion defined in this article, only three (3) standards and guidelines exceed 50% coverage of the Machine Learning Development Lifecycle (MLDL) learning assurance objectives baseline. The next steps of this work are to update the AS6983 learning assurance objectives and improve the associated means of compliance to approach a coverage score of 100%, and offer a certification-based process to other domains that could benefit from the AS6983 standard.","PeriodicalId":44558,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Aerospace","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a Machine Learning Development Lifecycle for Product Certification and Approval in Aviation\",\"authors\":\"F. Kaakai, Konstantin Dmitriev, S. Adibhatla, E. Baskaya, Emanuele Bezzecchi, Ramesh Bharadwaj, Barclay Brown, Giacomo Gentile, C. Gingins, S. Grihon, Christophe Travers\",\"doi\":\"10.4271/01-15-02-0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents a new machine learning (ML) development lifecycle which will constitute the core of the new aeronautical standard on ML called AS6983, jointly being developed by working group WG-114/G34 of EUROCAE and SAE. The article also presents a survey of several existing standards and guidelines related to ML in aeronautics, automotive, and industrial domains by comparing and contrasting their scope, purpose, and results. Standards and guidelines reviewed include the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Concept Paper, the DEEL (DEpendable and Explainable Learning) white paper “Machine Learning in Certified Systems”, Aerospace Vehicle System Institute (AVSI) Authorization for Expenditure (AFE) 87 report on Machine Learning, Guidance on the Assurance of Machine Learning for use in Autonomous Systems (AMLAS), Laboratoire National de Metrologie et d’Essais (LNE) Certification Standard of Processes for AI, the Underwriters Laboratories (UL) 4600 Safety Standard for Autonomous Vehicles, and the paper on Assuring the Machine Learning Lifecycle. These standards and guidelines are examined from the perspective of the learning assurance objectives they propose, and the means of evaluation and compliance for achieving these learning objectives. The reference used for comparison is the list of learning assurance objectives defined within the framework of AS6983 development. From this comparative analysis, and based on a coverage criterion defined in this article, only three (3) standards and guidelines exceed 50% coverage of the Machine Learning Development Lifecycle (MLDL) learning assurance objectives baseline. The next steps of this work are to update the AS6983 learning assurance objectives and improve the associated means of compliance to approach a coverage score of 100%, and offer a certification-based process to other domains that could benefit from the AS6983 standard.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAE International Journal of Aerospace\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAE International Journal of Aerospace\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4271/01-15-02-0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Aerospace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/01-15-02-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文介绍了一个新的机器学习(ML)开发生命周期,它将构成名为AS6983的ML新航空标准的核心,该标准由EUROCAE和SAE的WG-114/G34工作组共同开发。本文还通过比较和对比其范围、目的和结果,对航空、汽车和工业领域中与机器学习相关的几个现有标准和指南进行了调查。审查的标准和指南包括欧盟航空安全局(EASA)概念文件、DEEL(可靠和可解释学习)白皮书“认证系统中的机器学习”、航空航天飞行器系统研究所(AVSI)支出授权(AFE) 87机器学习报告、用于自主系统的机器学习保证指南(AMLAS)、国家计量与检验实验室(LNE)人工智能过程认证标准、美国保险商实验室(UL) 4600自动驾驶汽车安全标准,以及《确保机器学习生命周期》的论文。这些标准和指导方针从他们提出的学习保证目标的角度进行审查,以及实现这些学习目标的评估和遵守手段。用于比较的参考是在AS6983开发框架内定义的学习保证目标列表。从这个比较分析中,并基于本文中定义的覆盖标准,只有三(3)个标准和指南超过了机器学习开发生命周期(MLDL)学习保证目标基线的50%覆盖率。这项工作的下一步是更新AS6983学习保证目标,并改进相关的符合性手段,以达到100%的覆盖率,并为其他可以从AS6983标准中受益的领域提供基于认证的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toward a Machine Learning Development Lifecycle for Product Certification and Approval in Aviation
This article presents a new machine learning (ML) development lifecycle which will constitute the core of the new aeronautical standard on ML called AS6983, jointly being developed by working group WG-114/G34 of EUROCAE and SAE. The article also presents a survey of several existing standards and guidelines related to ML in aeronautics, automotive, and industrial domains by comparing and contrasting their scope, purpose, and results. Standards and guidelines reviewed include the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Concept Paper, the DEEL (DEpendable and Explainable Learning) white paper “Machine Learning in Certified Systems”, Aerospace Vehicle System Institute (AVSI) Authorization for Expenditure (AFE) 87 report on Machine Learning, Guidance on the Assurance of Machine Learning for use in Autonomous Systems (AMLAS), Laboratoire National de Metrologie et d’Essais (LNE) Certification Standard of Processes for AI, the Underwriters Laboratories (UL) 4600 Safety Standard for Autonomous Vehicles, and the paper on Assuring the Machine Learning Lifecycle. These standards and guidelines are examined from the perspective of the learning assurance objectives they propose, and the means of evaluation and compliance for achieving these learning objectives. The reference used for comparison is the list of learning assurance objectives defined within the framework of AS6983 development. From this comparative analysis, and based on a coverage criterion defined in this article, only three (3) standards and guidelines exceed 50% coverage of the Machine Learning Development Lifecycle (MLDL) learning assurance objectives baseline. The next steps of this work are to update the AS6983 learning assurance objectives and improve the associated means of compliance to approach a coverage score of 100%, and offer a certification-based process to other domains that could benefit from the AS6983 standard.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SAE International Journal of Aerospace
SAE International Journal of Aerospace ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信