西方哲学中的种族与性别:对“思想定位意味着什么”问题的另一个回答

IF 1.3 Q2 ETHNIC STUDIES

Critical Philosophy of Race Pub Date : 2018-07-11 DOI:10.5325/CRITPHILRACE.6.2.0180

Stella Sandford

{"title":"西方哲学中的种族与性别:对“思想定位意味着什么”问题的另一个回答","authors":"Stella Sandford","doi":"10.5325/CRITPHILRACE.6.2.0180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article critically extends Kant's 1786 discussion of \"orientation in thinking\" to ask what it means to \"orient oneself in thinking\" around the concepts of race and sex, addressed in the context of 1) the central place and historical importance of Kant in Western philosophy; and 2) Kant's theory of race and its relation to his critical philosophy. As presumptions about race and sex are already built into the history of philosophy, taking these concepts as an explicit orientation is not the expression of subjective interests, but a reflection and criticism of some of the objective forces that shape the world and have shaped the history of philosophy. An intellectual orientation around the concepts of race or sex can thus be understood as a critical position in relation to the problematic \"historical universality\" of these concepts, with the aim of transforming the false universality of biological race thinking, in particular, into the historical universality of critical social analysis.","PeriodicalId":43337,"journal":{"name":"Critical Philosophy of Race","volume":"6 1","pages":"180 - 197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Race and Sex in Western Philosophy: Another Answer to the Question \\\"What Does It Mean to Orient Oneself in Thinking?\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Stella Sandford\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/CRITPHILRACE.6.2.0180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article critically extends Kant's 1786 discussion of \\\"orientation in thinking\\\" to ask what it means to \\\"orient oneself in thinking\\\" around the concepts of race and sex, addressed in the context of 1) the central place and historical importance of Kant in Western philosophy; and 2) Kant's theory of race and its relation to his critical philosophy. As presumptions about race and sex are already built into the history of philosophy, taking these concepts as an explicit orientation is not the expression of subjective interests, but a reflection and criticism of some of the objective forces that shape the world and have shaped the history of philosophy. An intellectual orientation around the concepts of race or sex can thus be understood as a critical position in relation to the problematic \\\"historical universality\\\" of these concepts, with the aim of transforming the false universality of biological race thinking, in particular, into the historical universality of critical social analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Philosophy of Race\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"180 - 197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Philosophy of Race\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/CRITPHILRACE.6.2.0180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHNIC STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Philosophy of Race","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/CRITPHILRACE.6.2.0180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要：本文批判性地扩展了康德1786年关于“思维取向”的讨论，询问围绕种族和性别概念“思维取向自己”意味着什么，并在以下背景下进行了论述：1）康德在西方哲学中的中心地位和历史重要性；（2）康德的种族理论及其与批判哲学的关系。由于关于种族和性别的假设已经建立在哲学史中，将这些概念作为明确的取向并不是主观利益的表达，而是对塑造世界和塑造哲学史的一些客观力量的反思和批评。因此，围绕种族或性别概念的知识取向可以被理解为与这些概念有问题的“历史普遍性”相关的一个关键地位，其目的是将生物种族思维的虚假普遍性，特别是转化为批判性社会分析的历史普遍性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Race and Sex in Western Philosophy: Another Answer to the Question "What Does It Mean to Orient Oneself in Thinking?"

Abstract:This article critically extends Kant's 1786 discussion of "orientation in thinking" to ask what it means to "orient oneself in thinking" around the concepts of race and sex, addressed in the context of 1) the central place and historical importance of Kant in Western philosophy; and 2) Kant's theory of race and its relation to his critical philosophy. As presumptions about race and sex are already built into the history of philosophy, taking these concepts as an explicit orientation is not the expression of subjective interests, but a reflection and criticism of some of the objective forces that shape the world and have shaped the history of philosophy. An intellectual orientation around the concepts of race or sex can thus be understood as a critical position in relation to the problematic "historical universality" of these concepts, with the aim of transforming the false universality of biological race thinking, in particular, into the historical universality of critical social analysis.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Critical Philosophy of Race ETHNIC STUDIES-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The critical philosophy of race consists in the philosophical examination of issues raised by the concept of race, the practices and mechanisms of racialization, and the persistence of various forms of racism across the world. Critical philosophy of race is a critical enterprise in three respects: it opposes racism in all its forms; it rejects the pseudosciences of old-fashioned biological racialism; and it denies that anti-racism and anti-racialism summarily eliminate race as a meaningful category of analysis. Critical philosophy of race is a philosophical enterprise because of its engagement with traditional philosophical questions and in its readiness to engage critically some of the traditional answers.